Literature DB >> 21144542

Contrast enhanced maximum intensity projection ultrasound imaging for assessing angiogenesis in murine glioma and breast tumor models: A comparative study.

Flemming Forsberg1, Raymond J Ro, Traci B Fox, Ji-Bin Liu, See-Ying Chiou, Magdalena Potoczek, Barry B Goldberg.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to prospectively compare noninvasive, quantitative measures of vascularity obtained from four contrast enhanced ultrasound (US) techniques to four invasive immunohistochemical markers of tumor angiogenesis in a large group of murine xenografts. Glioma (C6) or breast cancer (NMU) cells were implanted in 144 rats. The contrast agent Optison (GE Healthcare, Princeton, NJ) was injected in a tail vein (dose: 0.4ml/kg). Power Doppler imaging (PDI), pulse-subtraction harmonic imaging (PSHI), flash-echo imaging (FEI), and Microflow imaging (MFI; a technique creating maximum intensity projection images over time) was performed with an Aplio scanner (Toshiba America Medical Systems, Tustin, CA) and a 7.5MHz linear array. Fractional tumor neovascularity was calculated from digital clips of contrast US, while the relative area stained was calculated from specimens. Results were compared using a factorial, repeated measures ANOVA, linear regression and z-tests. The tortuous morphology of tumor neovessels was visualized better with MFI than with the other US modes. Cell line, implantation method and contrast US imaging technique were significant parameters in the ANOVA model (p<0.05). The strongest correlation determined by linear regression in the C6 model was between PSHI and percent area stained with CD31 (r=0.37, p<0.0001). In the NMU model the strongest correlation was between FEI and COX-2 (r=0.46, p<0.0001). There were no statistically significant differences between correlations obtained with the various US methods (p>0.05). In conclusion, the largest study of contrast US of murine xenografts to date has been conducted and quantitative contrast enhanced US measures of tumor neovascularity in glioma and breast cancer xenograft models appear to provide a noninvasive marker for angiogenesis; although the best method for monitoring angiogenesis was not conclusively established. Copyright Â
© 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21144542      PMCID: PMC3030198          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2010.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasonics        ISSN: 0041-624X            Impact factor:   2.890


  44 in total

Review 1.  Angiogenesis in non-small cell lung cancer: the prognostic impact of neoangiogenesis and the cytokines VEGF and bFGF in tumours and blood.

Authors:  Roy M Bremnes; Carlos Camps; Rafael Sirera
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 5.705

2.  Comparing contrast-enhanced color flow imaging and pathological measures of breast lesion vascularity.

Authors:  Flemming Forsberg; Babita Kuruvilla; Mark B Pascua; Manisha H Chaudhari; Daniel A Merton; Juan P Palazzo; Barry B Goldberg
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2008-04-24       Impact factor: 2.998

3.  Segmentation and analysis of colour Doppler images of tumour vasculature.

Authors:  D S Bell; J C Bamber; R J Eckersley
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Comparing contrast-enhanced ultrasound to immunohistochemical markers of angiogenesis in a human melanoma xenograft model: preliminary results.

Authors:  Flemming Forsberg; Adam P Dicker; Mattew L Thakur; Nandkumar M Rawool; Ji-Bin Liu; William T Shi; Levon N Nazarian
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Angiogenesis: noninvasive quantitative assessment with contrast-enhanced functional US in murine model.

Authors:  Olivier Lucidarme; Yuko Kono; Jacqueline Corbeil; Sang-Hee Choi; Jean-Louis Golmard; Judith Varner; Robert F Mattrey
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Sensitization to hyperthermia by intracellular acidification of C6 glioma cells.

Authors:  R Kitai; M Kabuto; T Kubota; H Kobayashi; H Matsumoto; S Hayashi; H Shioura; T Ohtsubo; K Katayama; E Kano
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.130

7.  Differentiated rat glial cell strain in tissue culture.

Authors:  P Benda; J Lightbody; G Sato; L Levine; W Sweet
Journal:  Science       Date:  1968-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Imaging of angiogenesis using Cadence contrast pulse sequencing and targeted contrast agents.

Authors:  Susanne M Stieger; Paul A Dayton; Mark A Borden; Charles F Caskey; Stephen M Griffey; Erik R Wisner; Katherine W Ferrara
Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.161

Review 9.  Non-invasive assessment of tumor neovasculature: techniques and clinical applications.

Authors:  Rodolfo Perini; Regine Choe; Arjun G Yodh; Chandra Sehgal; Chaitanya R Divgi; Mark A Rosen
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 9.264

10.  Measuring tumor perfusion in control and treated murine tumors: correlation of microbubble contrast-enhanced sonography to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging and fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Kenneth J Niermann; Arthur C Fleischer; Jessica Huamani; Thomas E Yankeelov; Dong W Kim; Wendy D Wilson; Dennis E Hallahan
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.153

View more
  10 in total

1.  Correlation of ultrasound contrast agent derived blood flow parameters with immunohistochemical angiogenesis markers in murine xenograft tumor models.

Authors:  John R Eisenbrey; Christian C Wilson; Raymond J Ro; Traci B Fox; Ji-Bin Liu; See-Ying Chiou; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 2.890

2.  High and low frequency subharmonic imaging of angiogenesis in a murine breast cancer model.

Authors:  Manasi Dahibawkar; Mark A Forsberg; Aditi Gupta; Samantha Jaffe; Kelly Dulin; John R Eisenbrey; Valgerdur G Halldorsdottir; Anya I Forsberg; Jaydev K Dave; Andrew Marshall; Priscilla Machado; Traci B Fox; Ji-Bin Liu; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Ultrasonics       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 2.890

3.  Tumor Vascular Networks Depicted in Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Images as a Predictor for Transarterial Chemoembolization Treatment Response.

Authors:  Ipek Oezdemir; Corrine E Wessner; Colette Shaw; John R Eisenbrey; Kenneth Hoyt
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2020-06-16       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  Quantitative mapping of tumor vascularity using volumetric contrast-enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Kenneth Hoyt; Anna Sorace; Reshu Saini
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 6.016

5.  Volumetric contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging to assess early response to apoptosis-inducing anti-death receptor 5 antibody therapy in a breast cancer animal model.

Authors:  Kenneth Hoyt; Anna Sorace; Reshu Saini
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  The antiangiogenic effects of a vascular endothelial growth factor decoy receptor can be monitored in vivo using contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  Flemming Forsberg; Raymond J Ro; Andrew Marshall; Ji-Bin Liu; See-Ying Chiou; Daniel A Merton; Priscilla Machado; Adam P Dicker; Levon N Nazarian
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 4.488

7.  Recent developments in dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of tumor angiogenesis.

Authors:  Reshu Saini; Kenneth Hoyt
Journal:  Imaging Med       Date:  2014-02-01

8.  Comparing Quantitative Immunohistochemical Markers of Angiogenesis to Contrast-Enhanced Subharmonic Imaging.

Authors:  Aditi Gupta; Mark A Forsberg; Kelly Dulin; Samantha Jaffe; Jaydev K Dave; Valgerdur G Halldorsdottir; Andrew Marshall; Anya I Forsberg; John R Eisenbrey; Priscilla Machado; Traci B Fox; Ji-Bin Liu; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 2.153

9.  Effects of ultrasound and ultrasound contrast agent on vascular tissue.

Authors:  Steven C Wood; Sible Antony; Ronald P Brown; Jin Chen; Edward A Gordon; Victoria M Hitchins; Qin Zhang; Yunbo Liu; Subha Maruvada; Gerald R Harris
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 2.062

10.  Transrectal Subharmonic Ultrasound Imaging for Prostate Cancer Detection.

Authors:  I Gupta; B Freid; V Masarapu; P Machado; E Trabulsi; K Wallace; E Halpern; F Forsberg
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 2.649

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.