I Gupta1, B Freid1, V Masarapu1, P Machado1, E Trabulsi1, K Wallace2, E Halpern1, F Forsberg3. 1. Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA. 2. GE Global Research, Niskayuna, NY. 3. Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA. Electronic address: flemming.forsberg@jefferson.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prostate cancer (CaP) detection rates of contrast-enhanced, transrectal subharmonic ultrasound imaging (SHI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This IRB-approved study enrolled 55 subjects. The initial 5 subjects were studied for SHI optimization, while the remaining 50 were evaluated with contrast-enhanced sonography using continuous SHI, color, and power Doppler as well as conventional grayscale, continuous color, and power Doppler and SHI combined with maximum flash replenishment. A maximum of 6 directed biopsy cores were obtained from sites of greatest asymmetrical enhancement, followed by spatially distributed cores in a double sextant distribution. Subharmonic time-intensity parameters, including time to peak intensity, peak intensity, and estimated perfusion were also evaluated for each directed biopsy core. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and conditional logistic regression were employed to assess the benefit of each modality and the quantitative SHI parameters. RESULTS: Cancer was detected in 22 of 50 subjects. Among subjects with clinically significant CaP (n = 11), targeted cores were more likely to be positive (odds ratio 1.39, P = .02). The majority of patients detected by SHI demonstrated significant CaP (5/8); SHI remained an independent marker of malignancy in a multivariate logistic regression model (P = .027). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of imaging findings compared to biopsy results yielded diagnostic accuracies ranging from 0.59 to 0.80 for all imaging modalities with the highest being for quantitative subharmonic perfusion estimates. CONCLUSION: This first-in-humans study provides a preliminary estimate of the diagnostic accuracy of SHI for detection of clinically significant CaP (up to 80%).
OBJECTIVE: To assess the prostate cancer (CaP) detection rates of contrast-enhanced, transrectal subharmonic ultrasound imaging (SHI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This IRB-approved study enrolled 55 subjects. The initial 5 subjects were studied for SHI optimization, while the remaining 50 were evaluated with contrast-enhanced sonography using continuous SHI, color, and power Doppler as well as conventional grayscale, continuous color, and power Doppler and SHI combined with maximum flash replenishment. A maximum of 6 directed biopsy cores were obtained from sites of greatest asymmetrical enhancement, followed by spatially distributed cores in a double sextant distribution. Subharmonic time-intensity parameters, including time to peak intensity, peak intensity, and estimated perfusion were also evaluated for each directed biopsy core. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and conditional logistic regression were employed to assess the benefit of each modality and the quantitative SHI parameters. RESULTS: Cancer was detected in 22 of 50 subjects. Among subjects with clinically significant CaP (n = 11), targeted cores were more likely to be positive (odds ratio 1.39, P = .02). The majority of patients detected by SHI demonstrated significant CaP (5/8); SHI remained an independent marker of malignancy in a multivariate logistic regression model (P = .027). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of imaging findings compared to biopsy results yielded diagnostic accuracies ranging from 0.59 to 0.80 for all imaging modalities with the highest being for quantitative subharmonic perfusion estimates. CONCLUSION: This first-in-humans study provides a preliminary estimate of the diagnostic accuracy of SHI for detection of clinically significant CaP (up to 80%).
Authors: J P Sedelaar; G J van Leenders; C A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; H G van der Poel; J A van der Laak; F M Debruyne; H Wijkstra; J J de la Rosette Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: A R Padhani; C J Gapinski; D A Macvicar; G J Parker; J Suckling; P B Revell; M O Leach; D P Dearnaley; J E Husband Journal: Clin Radiol Date: 2000-02 Impact factor: 2.350
Authors: D Strohmeyer; F Frauscher; A Klauser; W Recheis; G Eibl; W Horninger; H Steiner; H Volgger; G Bartsch Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2001 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Ferdinand Frauscher; Andrea Klauser; Hubert Volgger; Ethan J Halpern; Leo Pallwein; Hannes Steiner; Antonius Schuster; Wolfgang Horninger; Hermann Rogatsch; Georg Bartsch Journal: J Urol Date: 2002-04 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Eline K Vos; Geert J S Litjens; Thiele Kobus; Thomas Hambrock; Christina A Hulsbergen-van de Kaa; Jelle O Barentsz; Henkjan J Huisman; Tom W J Scheenen Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2013-05-31 Impact factor: 20.096