Literature DB >> 21136577

Patient satisfaction with postmastectomy breast reconstruction: a comparison of saline and silicone implants.

Colleen M McCarthy1, Anne F Klassen, Stefan J Cano, Amie Scott, Nancy Vanlaeken, Peter A Lennox, Amy K Alderman, Babak J Mehrara, Joseph J Disa, Peter G Cordeiro, Andrea L Pusic.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: At a time when the safety and effectiveness of breast implants remains under close scrutiny, it is important to provide reliable and valid evidence regarding patient outcomes. In the setting of postmastectomy reconstruction, patient satisfaction and quality of life may be the most significant outcome variables when evaluating surgical success. The objective of the current study was to identify predictors of patient satisfaction with breast appearance, including implant type, in a large sample of women who underwent breast reconstruction surgery using implants.
METHODS: A multicenter, cross-sectional study design was used. A total of 672 women who had completed postmastectomy, implant-based reconstruction at 1 of 3 centers in North America were asked to complete the BREAST-Q (Reconstruction Module). Multivariate linear regression modeling was performed.
RESULTS: Completed questionnaire data were available for 482 of the 672 patients. In 176 women, silicone implants were placed and in 306, saline implants were used. The multivariate model confirmed that patients' satisfaction with their breasts was significantly higher in patients with silicone implants (P = .016). The receipt of postmastectomy radiotherapy was found to have a significant, negative effect on breast satisfaction (P<.000) in both silicone and saline implant recipients. In addition, for women who received either silicone or saline implants, satisfaction diminished over time (P = .017).
CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of postmastectomy reconstruction, patients who received silicone breast implants reported significantly higher satisfaction with the results of reconstruction than those who received saline implants. This information can be used to optimize shared medical decision-making by providing patients with realistic postoperative expectations.
Copyright © 2010 American Cancer Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21136577     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  36 in total

Review 1.  Breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomies: predictors of complications and outcomes.

Authors:  Sophocles H Voineskos; Simon G Frank; Peter G Cordeiro
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-12

2.  Defining a Research Agenda for Patient-Reported Outcomes in Surgery: Using a Delphi Survey of Stakeholders.

Authors:  Michael L Pezold; Andrea L Pusic; Wess A Cohen; James P Hollenberg; Zeeshan Butt; David R Flum; Larissa K Temple
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 14.766

3.  Patient satisfaction with nipple-sparing mastectomy: A prospective study of patient reported outcomes using the BREAST-Q.

Authors:  Michael A Howard; Mark Sisco; Katharine Yao; David J Winchester; Ermilo Barrera; Jeremy Warner; Jennifer Jaffe; Peter Hulick; Kristine Kuchta; Andrea L Pusic; Stephen F Sener
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Complications After Mastectomy and Immediate Breast Reconstruction for Breast Cancer: A Claims-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Reshma Jagsi; Jing Jiang; Adeyiza O Momoh; Amy Alderman; Sharon H Giordano; Thomas A Buchholz; Lori J Pierce; Steven J Kronowitz; Benjamin D Smith
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Tradeoffs Associated With Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Women Choosing Breast Reconstruction: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Cohort.

Authors:  Adeyiza O Momoh; Wess A Cohen; Kelley M Kidwell; Jennifer B Hamill; Ji Qi; Andrea L Pusic; Edwin G Wilkins; Evan Matros
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Evolution and update on current devices for prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Kristina O'Shaughnessy
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-04

Review 7.  Current perspectives on radiation therapy in autologous and prosthetic breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Mark W Clemens; Steven J Kronowitz
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2015-06

8.  Breast Cancer and Reconstruction: Normative Data for Interpreting the BREAST-Q.

Authors:  Lily R Mundy; Karen Homa; Anne F Klassen; Andrea L Pusic; Carolyn L Kerrigan
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 9.  Developing a theoretical framework to illustrate associations among patient satisfaction, body image and quality of life for women undergoing breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Michelle Cororve Fingeret; Summer W Nipomnick; Melissa A Crosby; Gregory P Reece
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 12.111

10.  Differences in breast aesthetic outcomes due to radiation: A validated, quantitative analysis of expander-implant reconstruction.

Authors:  Lauren M Mioton; Jessica Gaido; William Small; Neil A Fine; John Y Kim
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.