Lauren M Mioton1, Jessica Gaido2, William Small3, Neil A Fine2, John Y Kim2. 1. Vanderbilt School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee; 2. Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine; 3. Department of Radiation Oncology, The Robert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The potential ramifications of radiation use can be of particular concern in the breast reconstruction population, in which both surgical and aesthetic outcomes are important. Presently, there remains a paucity of data detailing the influence of radiation on specific reconstruction aesthetic outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a quantitative evaluation of aesthetic outcomes for expander-implant breast reconstruction in radiated and nonradiated patients using a validated scoring scale. METHODS: A series of consecutive expander-implant breast reconstruction operations performed by the senior author between 2004 and 2012 were reviewed. Four blinded members of the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Northwestern University (Illinois, USA) independently rated postoperative photographs of patients' breasts using a validated scoring scale with respect to five distinct aesthetic domains. RESULTS: Of the 206 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 69 received radiotherapy and 137 did not. The radiated cohort had lower scores in each aesthetic domain, with significant differences in contour (1.33 versus 1.51; P=0.041) and placement (1.45 versus 1.73; P<0.001). Linear regression analysis revealed a significant association between placement scores and radiation, and radiated patients had a significantly higher overall rate of complications. DISCUSSION: Variances in scores may represent the relative difficulty of expansions and proper implant placement in irradiated tissue, with possible skin fibrosis and decreased flexibility hindering prosthesis manipulation. CONCLUSION: Radiation adversely impacts breast contour and placement, with possible negative contributions to volume, scarring and inframammary fold definition, and results in higher rates of complications. Such detailed evaluation of the impact of radiation on aesthetics will enhance the management of patient expectations.
BACKGROUND: The potential ramifications of radiation use can be of particular concern in the breast reconstruction population, in which both surgical and aesthetic outcomes are important. Presently, there remains a paucity of data detailing the influence of radiation on specific reconstruction aesthetic outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a quantitative evaluation of aesthetic outcomes for expander-implant breast reconstruction in radiated and nonradiated patients using a validated scoring scale. METHODS: A series of consecutive expander-implant breast reconstruction operations performed by the senior author between 2004 and 2012 were reviewed. Four blinded members of the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery at Northwestern University (Illinois, USA) independently rated postoperative photographs of patients' breasts using a validated scoring scale with respect to five distinct aesthetic domains. RESULTS: Of the 206 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 69 received radiotherapy and 137 did not. The radiated cohort had lower scores in each aesthetic domain, with significant differences in contour (1.33 versus 1.51; P=0.041) and placement (1.45 versus 1.73; P<0.001). Linear regression analysis revealed a significant association between placement scores and radiation, and radiatedpatients had a significantly higher overall rate of complications. DISCUSSION: Variances in scores may represent the relative difficulty of expansions and proper implant placement in irradiated tissue, with possible skin fibrosis and decreased flexibility hindering prosthesis manipulation. CONCLUSION: Radiation adversely impacts breast contour and placement, with possible negative contributions to volume, scarring and inframammary fold definition, and results in higher rates of complications. Such detailed evaluation of the impact of radiation on aesthetics will enhance the management of patient expectations.
Entities:
Keywords:
Aesthetic outcomes; Breast reconstruction; Plastic surgery; Radiation; Tissue expander
Authors: Maurizio B Nava; Angela E Pennati; Laura Lozza; Andrea Spano; Milvia Zambetti; Giuseppe Catanuto Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2011-08 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: M Overgaard; P S Hansen; J Overgaard; C Rose; M Andersson; F Bach; M Kjaer; C C Gadeberg; H T Mouridsen; M B Jensen; K Zedeler Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1997-10-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Peter G Cordeiro; Andrea L Pusic; Joseph J Disa; Beryl McCormick; Kimberly VanZee Journal: Plast Reconstr Surg Date: 2004-03 Impact factor: 4.730
Authors: Julia S Wong; Alice Y Ho; Carolyn M Kaelin; Karyn L Bishop; Barbara Silver; Rebecca Gelman; Jay R Harris; Charles A Hergrueter Journal: Breast J Date: 2008 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.431
Authors: Shoshana M Rosenberg; Rulla M Tamimi; Shari Gelber; Kathryn J Ruddy; Sandra Kereakoglow; Virginia F Borges; Steven E Come; Lidia Schapira; Eric P Winer; Ann H Partridge Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2012-11-07 Impact factor: 3.894
Authors: Nikhil Sobti; Rachel E Weitzman; Kassandra P Nealon; Rachel B Jimenez; Lisa Gfrerer; David Mattos; Richard J Ehrlichman; Michele Gadd; Michelle Specht; William G Austen; Eric C Liao Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2020-01-24 Impact factor: 4.379