Literature DB >> 28091708

The effect of motor overflow on bimanual asymmetric force coordination.

David A Cunningham1,2, Sarah M Roelle2, Didier Allexandre1, Kelsey A Potter-Baker2, Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian2, Jayme S Knutson3, Guang H Yue1, Andre G Machado4, Ela B Plow5,6.   

Abstract

Motor overflow, typically described in the context of unimanual movements, refers to the natural tendency for a 'resting' limb to move during movement of the opposite limb and is thought to be influenced by inter-hemispheric interactions and intra-cortical networks within the 'resting' hemisphere. It is currently unknown, however, how motor overflow contributes to asymmetric force coordination task accuracy, referred to as bimanual interference, as there is need to generate unequal forces and corticospinal output for each limb. Here, we assessed motor overflow via motor evoked potentials (MEPs) and the regulation of motor overflow via inter-hemispheric inhibition (IHI) and short-intra-cortical inhibition (SICI) using transcranial magnetic stimulation in the presence of unimanual and bimanual isometric force production. All outcomes were measured in the left first dorsal interosseous (test hand) muscle, which maintained 30% maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), while the right hand (conditioning hand) was maintained at rest, 10, 30, or 70% of its MVC. We have found that as higher forces are generated with the conditioning hand, MEP amplitudes at the active test hand decreased and inter-hemispheric inhibition increased, suggesting reduced motor overflow in the presence of bimanual asymmetric forces. Furthermore, we found that subjects with less motor overflow (i.e., reduced MEP amplitudes in the test hemisphere) demonstrated poorer accuracy in maintaining 30% MVC across all conditions. These findings suggest that motor overflow may serve as an adaptive substrate to support bimanual asymmetric force coordination.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bimanual interference; Inter-hemispheric inhibition; Intra-cortical inhibition; Motor overflow; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28091708      PMCID: PMC5350018          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-016-4867-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

1.  Changes in segmental and motor cortical output with contralateral muscle contractions and altered sensory inputs in humans.

Authors:  Tibor Hortobágyi; Janet L Taylor; Nicolas T Petersen; Gabrielle Russell; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Asymmetric interference associated with force amplitude and hand dominance in bimanual constant isometric force.

Authors:  Xiaogang Hu; Karl M Newell
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.422

3.  Effects of volitional contraction on intracortical inhibition and facilitation in the human motor cortex.

Authors:  Enzo Ortu; Franca Deriu; Antonio Suppa; Eusebio Tolu; John C Rothwell
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Mechanisms underlying functional changes in the primary motor cortex ipsilateral to an active hand.

Authors:  Monica A Perez; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Toward a movement dynamics perspective on dual-task performance.

Authors:  S P Swinnen; C B Walter
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 2.888

6.  Functional coupling and regional activation of human cortical motor areas during simple, internally paced and externally paced finger movements.

Authors:  C Gerloff; J Richard; J Hadley; A E Schulman; M Honda; M Hallett
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 13.501

7.  Removing visual feedback for a single limb alters between-limb force tremor relationships during isometric bilateral contractions.

Authors:  Leanne C Kenway; Leanne M Bisset; Justin J Kavanagh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-19       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Calculating correlation coefficients with repeated observations: Part 1--Correlation within subjects.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-02-18

Review 9.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Mark Hallett; Paolo M Rossini; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

10.  Interhemispheric control of unilateral movement.

Authors:  Vincent Beaulé; Sara Tremblay; Hugo Théoret
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2012-12-06       Impact factor: 3.599

View more
  3 in total

1.  The modulation of short and long-latency interhemispheric inhibition during bimanually coordinated movements.

Authors:  Harry T Jordan; Miriam Schrafl-Altermatt; Winston D Byblow; Cathy M Stinear
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-03-09       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Neural motor control differs between bimanual common-goal vs. bimanual dual-goal tasks.

Authors:  Wan-Wen Liao; Jill Whitall; Joseph E Barton; Sandy McCombe Waller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Bilateral Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation Reveals New Insights Into the Interhemispheric Competition Model in Chronic Stroke.

Authors:  David A Cunningham; Jayme S Knutson; Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Kelsey A Potter-Baker; Andre G Machado; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.919

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.