Literature DB >> 24805077

Neural coding of passive lump detection in compliant artificial tissue.

James C Gwilliam1, Takashi Yoshioka1, Allison M Okamura2, Steven S Hsiao1.   

Abstract

Here, we investigate the neural mechanisms of detecting lumps embedded in artificial compliant tissues. We performed a combined psychophysical study of humans performing a passive lump detection task with a neurophysiological study in nonhuman primates (Macaca mulatta) where we recorded the responses of peripheral mechanoreceptive afferents to lumps embedded at various depths in intermediates (rubbers) of varying compliance. The psychophysical results reveal that human lump detection is greatly degraded by both lump depth and decreased compliance of the intermediate. The neurophysiology results reveal that only the slowly adapting type 1 (SA1) afferents provide a clear spatial representation of lumps at all depths and that the representation is affected by lump size, depth, and compliance of the intermediate. The rapidly adapting afferents are considerably less sensitive to the lump. We defined eight neural response measures that we hypothesized could explain the psychophysical behavior, including peak firing rate, spatial spread of neural activity, and additional parameters derived from these measures. We find that peak firing rate encodes the depth of the lump, and the neural spatial spread of the SA1 response encodes for lump size but not lump shape. We also find that the perception of lump size may be affected by the compliance of the intermediate. The results show that lump detection is based on a spatial population code of the SA1 afferents, which is distorted by the depth of the lump and compliance of the tissue.
Copyright © 2014 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coding; somatosensory; tactile

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24805077      PMCID: PMC4122732          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00032.2013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  23 in total

1.  Observations on active touch.

Authors:  J J GIBSON
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1962-11       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  The staircrase-method in psychophysics.

Authors:  T N CORNSWEET
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1962-09

3.  Human tactile pattern recognition: active versus passive touch, velocity effects, and patterns of confusion.

Authors:  F Vega-Bermudez; K O Johnson; S S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Velocity invariance of receptive field structure in somatosensory cortical area 3b of the alert monkey.

Authors:  J J DiCarlo; K O Johnson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  The sense of flutter-vibration: comparison of the human capacity with response patterns of mechanoreceptive afferents from the monkey hand.

Authors:  W H Talbot; I Darian-Smith; H H Kornhuber; V B Mountcastle
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1968-03       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Measurement of tissue mechanical characteristics to distinguish between benign and malignant prostatic disease.

Authors:  S Phipps; T H J Yang; F K Habib; R L Reuben; S A McNeill
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  A comparison of visual and two modes of tactual letter resolution.

Authors:  J R Phillips; K O Johnson; H M Browne
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-09

8.  Tactile discrimination of shape: responses of slowly and rapidly adapting mechanoreceptive afferents to a step indented into the monkey fingerpad.

Authors:  M A Srinivasan; R H LaMotte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Characterizing the range of simulated prostate abnormalities palpable by digital rectal examination.

Authors:  Leigh A Baumgart; Gregory J Gerling; Ellen J Bass
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  A tactile stimulator for studying passive shape perception.

Authors:  John W Lane; Paul J Fitzgerald; Jeffrey M Yau; Izzet Pembeci; Steven S Hsiao
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 2.390

View more
  3 in total

1.  Computational Modeling Reinforces that Proprioceptive Cues May Augment Compliance Discrimination When Elasticity Is Decoupled From Radius of Curvature.

Authors:  Yuxiang Wang; Gregory J Gerling
Journal:  Haptics (2014)       Date:  2014

2.  Stretching the skin immediately enhances perceived stiffness and gradually enhances the predictive control of grip force.

Authors:  Mor Farajian; Raz Leib; Hanna Kossowsky; Tomer Zaidenberg; Ferdinando A Mussa-Ivaldi; Ilana Nisky
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Grasp-squeeze adaptation to changes in object compliance leads to dynamic beta-band communication between primary somatosensory and motor cortices.

Authors:  Huy Cu; Laurie Lynch; Kevin Huang; Wilson Truccolo; Arto Nurmikko
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 4.996

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.