Literature DB >> 21131892

The floating mass transducer for external auditory canal and middle ear malformations.

Liliana Colletti1, Marco Carner, Marco Mandalà, Sheila Veronese, Vittorio Colletti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The indications for the Med-El Vibrant Soundbridge, currently limited to patients with sensorineural hearing loss and normal middle ear function, have been extended to include patients with conductive or mixed hearing loss because of severe acquired or congenital ossicular chain defects. Patients with congenital aural atresia have combined malformations of the external auditory canal and the middle ear, often accompanied by severe mixed hearing impairment. Long-term results of traditional surgical techniques for treatment of congenital aural atresia show a persistent air-bone gap in most patients, suggesting that new and better techniques for hearing rehabilitation in these patients would be of value. This study demonstrates that placement of the floating mass transducer of the Med-El Vibrant Soundbridge on the round window (RW) allows optimal amplification and enables the restoration of good hearing in these patients. STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective case review.
SETTING: Tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: The study population comprised 12 patients-5 adults and 7 children-with severe external auditory canal and middle ear malformations. The patients were either judged not to be candidates for air conduction hearing aids or declined bone conduction and Bone-Anchored Hearing Aids. INTERVENTION: RW implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pure-tone threshold and speech understanding.
RESULTS: Significant improvements were observed in pure-tone threshold and speech understanding immediately after surgery and at follow-up intervals ranging from 12 to 48 months. No complications or instances of device extrusion were observed in these patients.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that RW implantation offers a viable and improved treatment option for patients with severe mixed hearing loss and congenital malformation of the outer and middle ear.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21131892     DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181ff752a

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otol Neurotol        ISSN: 1531-7129            Impact factor:   2.311


  11 in total

Review 1.  Active middle ear implantation: imaging in the pre-operative planning and post-operative assessment of the Vibrant SoundbridgeTM.

Authors:  Christian Burd; Irumee Pai; Steve Ej Connor
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Congenital aural atresia treated with floating mass transducer on the round window: 5 years of imaging experience.

Authors:  M Barillari; R Cerini; M Carner; C Cacciatori; F Spagnolli; N Cardobi; M Mandalà; L Colletti; V Colletti; R Pozzi Mucelli
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  The positional relationship between facial nerve and round window niche in patients with congenital aural atresia and stenosis.

Authors:  Keguang Chen; Huiying Lyu; Youzhou Xie; Lin Yang; Tianyu Zhang; Peidong Dai
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Comparison of forward (ear-canal) and reverse (round-window) sound stimulation of the cochlea.

Authors:  Christof Stieger; John J Rosowski; Hideko Heidi Nakajima
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Grading system for the selection of patients with congenital aural atresia for active middle ear implants.

Authors:  Henning Frenzel; Georg Sprinzl; Gerlig Widmann; Dirk Petersen; Barbara Wollenberg; Christian Mohr
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 2.804

6.  Vibrant soundbridge in aural atresia: does severity matter?

Authors:  B J McKinnon; T Dumon; R Hagen; E Lesinskas; R Mlynski; M Profant; J Spindel; J Van Beek-King; M Zernotti
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-13       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  Developmental disorders of the ear in children and adolescents: conservative and surgical treatment options.

Authors:  Thomas Braun; John Martin Hempel; Alexander Berghaus
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-02-07       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 8.  Efficacy of Auditory Implants for Patients With Conductive and Mixed Hearing Loss Depends on Implant Center.

Authors:  Ad Snik; Hannes Maier; Bill Hodgetts; Martin Kompis; Griet Mertens; Paul van de Heyning; Thomas Lenarz; Arjan Bosman
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.311

9.  Implantation of the Vibrant Soundbridge in a Case of Bilateral Malformation of the Middle and External Ear.

Authors:  Henryk Skarżyński; Łukasz Plichta; Bartłomiej Król; Katarzyna Beata Cywka; Piotr Henryk Skarżyński
Journal:  Am J Case Rep       Date:  2021-05-12

Review 10.  Implantable and semi-implantable hearing AIDS: a review of history, indications, and surgery.

Authors:  Aline Gomes Bittencourt; Patrick Rademaker Burke; Isabela de Souza Jardim; Rubens de Brito; Robinson Koji Tsuji; Anna Carolina de Oliveira Fonseca; Ricardo Ferreira Bento
Journal:  Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-04-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.