Literature DB >> 36156790

Definitive fusions are better than growing rod procedures for juvenile patients with cerebral palsy and scoliosis: a prospective comparative cohort study.

Arun R Hariharan1, Suken A Shah2, Paul D Sponseller3, Burt Yaszay4, Michael P Glotzbecker5, George H Thompson5, Patrick J Cahill6, Tracey P Bastrom7.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compared the outcomes of juvenile patients with cerebral palsy (CP) and scoliosis who underwent spinal fusion (SF) versus growing rod (GR) surgery.
METHODS: Two prospective multicenter registries were queried for patients 8-10 years old with minimum 2-year follow-up who underwent SF or GR surgery (no MCGR). Demographics, radiographs, complications, and outcome scores were recorded.
RESULTS: There were 35 patients in the SF and 15 in the GR group. The mean age at surgery was 10 and 9.3 years in the SF and GR groups, respectively (p = 0.004). In the SF group preoperatively, the major curve measured 86° and 80° in the GR group (p = 0.40). "Definitive" surgery in the GR group consisted of SF in 10, implant retention in three, and implant removal in two. The SF group had 60.8% and the GR group had 45.0% correction following "definitive" surgery (p = 0.03). In the SF group, 8 patients and in the GR group, 9 patients (SF = 22.9%, GR = 60.0%) had a complication (p = 0.01). In the SF group, two patients (5.7%) had reoperations for infection; eight patients (53.3%) in the GR group had reoperations for infection and implant complications (p < 0.001). In the SF group, 23/30 parents (76.6%) noted that the child's life "improved a lot." In the GR group, 3/6 parents (50.0%) noted they were "neutral" about their child's ability to do things, 2/6 (33.3%) were "very dissatisfied."
CONCLUSIONS: SF treatment for juvenile patients with CP and scoliosis resulted in fewer complications and unplanned reoperations and better radiographic outcomes compared with GR. Quality of life improvements were also better in the SF group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Scoliosis Research Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cerebral palsy; Growing rods; Juvenile; Scoliosis; Spinal fusion

Year:  2022        PMID: 36156790     DOI: 10.1007/s43390-022-00577-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine Deform        ISSN: 2212-134X


  27 in total

Review 1.  Normal and abnormal spine and thoracic cage development.

Authors:  Federico Canavese; Alain Dimeglio
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2013-10-18

2.  Untreated scoliosis in severe cerebral palsy.

Authors:  V Kalen; M M Conklin; F C Sherman
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.324

3.  Impact of orthoses on the rate of scoliosis progression in children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  A Miller; T Temple; F Miller
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.324

4.  The Long-term Outcome of Early Spine Fusion for Scoliosis in Children With Cerebral Palsy.

Authors:  Prakash Sitoula; Laurens Holmes; Julieanne Sees; Kenneth Rogers; Kirk Dabney; Freeman Miller
Journal:  Clin Spine Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.876

5.  Considerations in the treatment of cerebral palsy patients with spinal deformities.

Authors:  R L Ferguson; B L Allen
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 2.472

6.  The vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib implant for the treatment of thoracic insufficiency syndrome associated with congenital and neuromuscular scoliosis in young children.

Authors:  Anna K Hell; Robert M Campbell; Fritz Hefti
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 7.  Scoliosis in cerebral palsy: an overview and recent results.

Authors:  J D Thomson; J V Banta
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop B       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.041

8.  Improving Health-related Quality of Life for Patients With Nonambulatory Cerebral Palsy: Who Stands to Gain From Scoliosis Surgery?

Authors:  Daniel J Miller; John Jack M Flynn; Saba Pasha; Burt Yaszay; Stefan Parent; Jahangir Asghar; Mark F Abel; Joshua M Pahys; Amer Samdani; Steven W Hwang; Unni G Narayanan; Paul D Sponseller; Patrick J Cahill
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.324

9.  Crankshaft effect after posterior spinal fusion and unit rod instrumentation in children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  J D Smucker; F Miller
Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.324

10.  The Pros and Cons of Operating Early Versus Late in the Progression of Cerebral Palsy Scoliosis.

Authors:  Steven M Hollenbeck; Burt Yaszay; Paul D Sponseller; Carrie E Bartley; Suken A Shah; Jahangir Asghar; Mark F Abel; Firoz Miyanji; Peter O Newton
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2019-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.