Literature DB >> 21128842

Clinical performance of three bolus calculators in subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a head-to-head-to-head comparison.

Howard Zisser1, Robin Wagner, Stefan Pleus, Cornelia Haug, Nina Jendrike, Chris Parkin, Matthias Schweitzer, Guido Freckmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Insulin pump systems now provide automated bolus calculators (ABCs) that electronically calculate insulin boluses to address carbohydrate intake and out-of-range blood glucose (bG) levels. We compared the efficacy of three ABCs (Accu-Chek(®) Combo [Roche Insulin Delivery Systems (IDS), Inc., Fishers, IN, a member of the Roche Group], Animas(®) 2020 [Animas Corp., West Chester, PA, a Johnson and Johnson company], and MiniMed Paradigm Bolus Wizard(®) [Medtronic MiniMed, Northridge, CA]) to safely reduce postprandial hyperglycemia in type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM).
METHODS: T1DM subjects (n = 24) were recruited at a single center for a prospective, triple crossover study. ABCs with the programmed target range (80-140 mg/dL) were used in random order. Postprandial hyperglycemia was induced by reducing the calculated bolus by 25%. Two hours after test meals, the ABCs were allowed to determine whether a correction bolus was needed. Differences between 6-h bG values after test meals that achieved 2-h postprandial hyperglycemia and the mean of the target range (110 mg/dL) were determined.
RESULTS: The mean difference between 6-h bG levels following test meals and the 110 mg/dL bG target with the MiniMed device (47.4 ± 31.8 mg/dL) was significantly higher than the Animas (17.3 ± 30.9 mg/dL) and Roche IDS (18.8 ± 33.8 mg/dL) devices (P = 0.0022 and P = 0.0049, respectively). The number of meals with 2-h postprandial hyperglycemia and bG levels at 2 h was similar. Roche IDS and Animas devices recommended correction boluses significantly (P = 0.0001 and P = 0.0002, respectively) more frequently than the MiniMed device. ABC use was not associated with severe hypoglycemia. There was no significant difference in the rate of mild hypoglycemia (bG <60 mg/dL not requiring assistance) among the three groups (Roche IDS and Animas, n = 2; MiniMed, n = 0).
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the Roche IDS and Animas devices were more efficacious in controlling postprandial hyperglycemia than the MiniMed device. This may be due, in part, to differences in ABC setup protocols and algorithms. Use of ABCs can assist in controlling postprandial glycemia without significant hypoglycemia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21128842     DOI: 10.1089/dia.2010.0064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  19 in total

1.  Use of an automated bolus calculator reduces fear of hypoglycemia and improves confidence in dosage accuracy in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus treated with multiple daily insulin injections.

Authors:  Katharine Barnard; Christopher Parkin; Amanda Young; Mansoor Ashraf
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-01-01

2.  Can integrated technology improve self-care behavior in youth with type 1 diabetes? A randomized crossover trial of automated pump function.

Authors:  Orla M Neylon; Michele A O'Connell; Susan M Donath; Fergus J Cameron
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-06-17

3.  Multicenter user evaluation of ACCU-CHEK® Combo, an integrated system for continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.

Authors:  David Kerr; Roel P L M Hoogma; Andreas Buhr; Bettina Petersen; Fred E M G Storms
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-11-01

4.  Improving the computational effort of set-inversion-based prandial insulin delivery for its integration in insulin pumps.

Authors:  Fabian León-Vargas; Remei Calm; Jorge Bondia; Josep Vehí
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-11-01

5.  Insulin dose optimization using an automated artificial intelligence-based decision support system in youths with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Revital Nimri; Tadej Battelino; Lori M Laffel; Robert H Slover; Desmond Schatz; Stuart A Weinzimer; Klemen Dovc; Thomas Danne; Moshe Phillip
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 53.440

6.  Novel insulin delivery profiles for mixed meals for sensor-augmented pump and closed-loop artificial pancreas therapy for type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Asavari Srinivasan; Joon Bok Lee; Eyal Dassau; Francis J Doyle
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-07-21

7.  Glucose meters with built-in automated bolus calculator: gadget or real value for insulin-treated diabetic patients?

Authors:  Ides M Colin; Isabelle Paris
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2012-12-19       Impact factor: 2.945

8.  Cross-sectional survey and retrospective analysis of a large cohort of adults with type 1 diabetes with long-term continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion treatment.

Authors:  Michael Joubert; Julia Morera; Angel Vicente; Anne Rod; Jean-Jacques Parienti; Yves Reznik
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-05-27

9.  Unknown Safety and Efficacy of Smartphone Bolus Calculator Apps Puts Patients at Risk for Severe Adverse Outcomes.

Authors:  Irl B Hirsch; Christopher G Parkin
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-06-28

10.  Clinical evaluation of the use of a multifunctional remotely controlled insulin pump: multicenter observational study.

Authors:  Robert Boizel; Michel Pinget; Karim Lachgar; Christopher G Parkin; Hervé Grulet; Françoise Guillon-Metz; Joerg Weissmann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2014-08-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.