Literature DB >> 32908282

Insulin dose optimization using an automated artificial intelligence-based decision support system in youths with type 1 diabetes.

Revital Nimri1, Tadej Battelino2, Lori M Laffel3, Robert H Slover4, Desmond Schatz5, Stuart A Weinzimer6, Klemen Dovc2, Thomas Danne7, Moshe Phillip8,9.   

Abstract

Despite the increasing adoption of insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitoring devices, most people with type 1 diabetes do not achieve their glycemic goals1. This could be related to a lack of expertise or inadequate time for clinicians to analyze complex sensor-augmented pump data. We tested whether frequent insulin dose adjustments guided by an automated artificial intelligence-based decision support system (AI-DSS) is as effective and safe as those guided by physicians in controlling glucose levels. ADVICE4U was a six-month, multicenter, multinational, parallel, randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial in 108 participants with type 1 diabetes, aged 10-21 years and using insulin pump therapy (ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT03003806). Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive remote insulin dose adjustment every three weeks guided by either an AI-DSS, (AI-DSS arm, n = 54) or by physicians (physician arm, n = 54). The results for the primary efficacy measure-the percentage of time spent within the target glucose range (70-180 mg dl-1 (3.9-10.0 mmol l-1))-in the AI-DSS arm were statistically non-inferior to those in the physician arm (50.2 ± 11.1% versus 51.6 ± 11.3%, respectively, P < 1 × 10-7). The percentage of readings below 54 mg dl-1 (<3.0 mmol l-1) within the AI-DSS arm was statistically non-inferior to that in the physician arm (1.3 ± 1.4% versus 1.0 ± 0.9%, respectively, P < 0.0001). Three severe adverse events related to diabetes (two severe hypoglycemia, one diabetic ketoacidosis) were reported in the physician arm and none in the AI-DSS arm. In conclusion, use of an automated decision support tool for optimizing insulin pump settings was non-inferior to intensive insulin titration provided by physicians from specialized academic diabetes centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32908282     DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-1045-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Med        ISSN: 1078-8956            Impact factor:   53.440


  21 in total

1.  Clinical performance of three bolus calculators in subjects with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a head-to-head-to-head comparison.

Authors:  Howard Zisser; Robin Wagner; Stefan Pleus; Cornelia Haug; Nina Jendrike; Chris Parkin; Matthias Schweitzer; Guido Freckmann
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.118

2.  Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  David M Nathan; Patricia A Cleary; Jye-Yu C Backlund; Saul M Genuth; John M Lachin; Trevor J Orchard; Philip Raskin; Bernard Zinman
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Automated insulin dosing guidance to optimise insulin management in patients with type 2 diabetes: a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Richard M Bergenstal; Mary Johnson; Rebecca Passi; Anuj Bhargava; Natalie Young; Davida F Kruger; Eran Bashan; Stanley G Bisgaier; Deanna J Marriott Isaman; Israel Hodish
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-02-23       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  ISPAD Clinical Practice Consensus Guidelines 2018: The delivery of ambulatory diabetes care to children and adolescents with diabetes.

Authors:  Catherine Pihoker; Gun Forsander; Bereket Fantahun; Anju Virmani; Sarah Corathers; Paul Benitez-Aguirre; Junfen Fu; David M Maahs
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 4.866

5.  Current state of type 1 diabetes treatment in the U.S.: updated data from the T1D Exchange clinic registry.

Authors:  Kellee M Miller; Nicole C Foster; Roy W Beck; Richard M Bergenstal; Stephanie N DuBose; Linda A DiMeglio; David M Maahs; William V Tamborlane
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  How our current medical care system fails people with diabetes: lack of timely, appropriate clinical decisions.

Authors:  Mayer B Davidson
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 17.152

7.  Glycemic control in youth with diabetes: the SEARCH for diabetes in Youth Study.

Authors:  Diana B Petitti; Georgeanna J Klingensmith; Ronny A Bell; Jeanette S Andrews; Dana Dabelea; Giuseppina Imperatore; Santica Marcovina; Catherine Pihoker; Debra Standiford; Beth Waitzfelder; Elizabeth Mayer-Davis
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 4.406

8.  Using the Internet-based upload blood glucose monitoring and therapy management system in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  S Shalitin; T Ben-Ari; M Yackobovitch-Gavan; A Tenenbaum; Y Lebenthal; L de Vries; M Phillip
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2013-08-24       Impact factor: 4.280

Review 9.  Clinical Implications of Real-time and Intermittently Scanned Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Steven V Edelman; Nicholas B Argento; Jeremy Pettus; Irl B Hirsch
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Type 1 Diabetes in Children and Adolescents: A Position Statement by the American Diabetes Association.

Authors:  Jane L Chiang; David M Maahs; Katharine C Garvey; Korey K Hood; Lori M Laffel; Stuart A Weinzimer; Joseph I Wolfsdorf; Desmond Schatz
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  100 Years of Insulin: Lifesaver, immune target, and potential remedy for prevention.

Authors:  Anette-Gabriele Ziegler; Thomas Danne; Carolin Daniel; Ezio Bonifacio
Journal:  Med (N Y)       Date:  2021-09-15

2.  Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Control in Newly Diagnosed Type 1 Diabetes: the Pilot 4T Study.

Authors:  Priya Prahalad; Victoria Y Ding; Dessi P Zaharieva; Ananta Addala; Ramesh Johari; David Scheinker; Manisha Desai; Korey Hood; David M Maahs
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2022-03-24       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Artificial Intelligence in NICU and PICU: A Need for Ecological Validity, Accountability, and Human Factors.

Authors:  Avishek Choudhury; Estefania Urena
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-21

Review 4.  Current Status and Emerging Options for Automated Insulin Delivery Systems.

Authors:  Gregory P Forlenza; Rayhan A Lal
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 7.337

Review 5.  'Smart' insulin-delivery technologies and intrinsic glucose-responsive insulin analogues.

Authors:  Mark A Jarosinski; Balamurugan Dhayalan; Nischay Rege; Deepak Chatterjee; Michael A Weiss
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 6.  Felix dies natalis, insulin… ceterum autem censeo "beta is better".

Authors:  Lorenzo Piemonti
Journal:  Acta Diabetol       Date:  2021-05-23       Impact factor: 4.280

Review 7.  Algorithms for Automated Insulin Delivery: An Overview.

Authors:  Andreas Thomas; Lutz Heinemann
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-05-06

8.  Clinical Decision Support for Diabetes Care in the Hospital: A Time for Change Toward Improvement of Management and Outcomes.

Authors:  Ariana R Pichardo-Lowden
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-01-07

Review 9.  AI in health and medicine.

Authors:  Pranav Rajpurkar; Emma Chen; Oishi Banerjee; Eric J Topol
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 87.241

10.  Diabetes Technology Meeting 2020.

Authors:  Trisha Shang; Jennifer Y Zhang; B Wayne Bequette; Jennifer K Raymond; Gerard Coté; Jennifer L Sherr; Jessica Castle; John Pickup; Yarmela Pavlovic; Juan Espinoza; Laurel H Messer; Tim Heise; Carlos E Mendez; Sarah Kim; Barry H Ginsberg; Umesh Masharani; Rodolfo J Galindo; David C Klonoff
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.