Literature DB >> 21127895

Comparison of physiological response to cardiopulmonary exercise testing among cancer survivors and healthy controls.

Riggs J Klika1, Katharina S Golik, Scott N Drum, Kathleen E Callahan, William G Thorland.   

Abstract

Selected physiological responses, including lactate kinetics, to cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) were evaluated among a group of cancer survivors (CS, n = 55) and healthy controls (HC, n = 213). It was uncertain if lactate testing in a group of cancer survivors could provide useful information about training intensity. It was hypothesized that chemotherapy, radiation, surgery, physical inactivity or some combination thereof would alter the normal lactate kinetics (curvilinearity) in the relationship of lactate concentration versus power. Physiologic responses of CS (heart rate, blood pressure, O(2) saturation, RPE, lactate, VO(2peak), and peak power) during cycle ergometry were compared to HC. Comparisons (t tests and Chi-square) were made between the groups and shape of lactate plots were analyzed for determination of a breakpoint. Multiple logistical regressions were then utilized to identify factors related to the inability to determine lactate breakpoints. Lactate breakpoints were common to all but one HC whereas among the CS there was a small subset of subjects (n = 5) who did not show a lactate breakpoint. Group differences indicated that female CS were significantly older, had greater BMI's, and lower work capacity than HC. Males CS had significantly lower work capacity than HC. Multiple logistical regression analyses, in all instances, yielded no statistically significant models predictive of the inability to determine a lactate breakpoint. In this sample of CS and HC, physiological responses and lactate kinetics during CPET were similar while work capacity among the CS was lower. Because lactate breakpoints were found, lactate threshold could be determined for all but a few individuals. For those working with CS, CPET with ECG monitoring and lactate threshold measures should be considered for those wishing for precise and safe training intensities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21127895     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-010-1749-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  37 in total

1.  Safety and feasibility of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with advanced cancer.

Authors:  Lee W Jones; Neil D Eves; John R Mackey; Carolyn J Peddle; Mark Haykowsky; Anil A Joy; Kerry S Courneya; Keith Tankel; Jennifer Spratlin; Tony Reiman
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2006-11-17       Impact factor: 5.705

Review 2.  Comparison of cardioprotective benefits of vigorous versus moderate intensity aerobic exercise.

Authors:  David P Swain; Barry A Franklin
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2005-11-16       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 3.  Cardiorespiratory exercise testing in clinical oncology research: systematic review and practice recommendations.

Authors:  Lee W Jones; Neil D Eves; Mark Haykowsky; Anil A Joy; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  Relationship between blood lactate response to exercise and endurance performance in competitive female master cyclists.

Authors:  J F Nichols; S L Phares; M J Buono
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.118

5.  Examination of four different instruments for measuring blood lactate concentration.

Authors:  J I Medbø; A Mamen; O Holt Olsen; F Evertsen
Journal:  Scand J Clin Lab Invest       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.713

Review 6.  Nutrition and physical activity during and after cancer treatment: an American Cancer Society guide for informed choices.

Authors:  Colleen Doyle; Lawrence H Kushi; Tim Byers; Kerry S Courneya; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Barbara Grant; Anne McTiernan; Cheryl L Rock; Cyndi Thompson; Ted Gansler; Kimberly S Andrews
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 508.702

7.  Efficacy of cycling training based on a power field test.

Authors:  Riggs J Klika; Mark S Alderdice; John J Kvale; Jay T Kearney
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Effect of exercise training intensity on abdominal visceral fat and body composition.

Authors:  Brian A Irving; Christopher K Davis; David W Brock; Judy Y Weltman; Damon Swift; Eugene J Barrett; Glenn A Gaesser; Arthur Weltman
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Evaluation of the Accusport Lactate Analyser.

Authors:  J W Fell; J M Rayfield; J P Gulbin; P T Gaffney
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 3.118

10.  Six-month follow-up of patient-rated outcomes in a randomized controlled trial of exercise training during breast cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Kerry S Courneya; Roanne J Segal; Karen Gelmon; Robert D Reid; John R Mackey; Christine M Friedenreich; Caroline Proulx; Kirstin Lane; Aliya B Ladha; Jeffrey K Vallance; Qi Liu; Yutaka Yasui; Donald C McKenzie
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.254

View more
  2 in total

1.  A Feasibility Study Related To Inactive Cancer Survivors Compared with Non-Cancer Controls during Aerobic Exercise Training.

Authors:  Scott N Drum; Riggs J Klika; Susan D Carter; Lisa K Sprod; Lars Donath
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Cardiorespiratory and neuromuscular deconditioning in fatigued and non-fatigued breast cancer survivors.

Authors:  Sarah E Neil; Riggs J Klika; S Jayne Garland; Donald C McKenzie; Kristin L Campbell
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.603

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.