Literature DB >> 17313274

Efficacy of cycling training based on a power field test.

Riggs J Klika1, Mark S Alderdice, John J Kvale, Jay T Kearney.   

Abstract

The efficacy of an 8-minute field test to prescribe exercise intensity and assess changes in fitness was evaluated before and after 8 weeks of indoor cycling, and the results were confirmed by laboratory assessment. Changes in maximal steady-state power (MSSP), power at lactate threshold (PT(lact)), maximal power (Pmax), and maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) were measured on 56 participants (20 women, 36 men; mean +/- SD. 46.5 +/- 10.0 years) who completed 1-hour, biweekly indoor stationary cycling classes on their own road bike outfitted with a Power Tap Pro power meter. The MSSP was defined as the average power during an 8-minute field test, which was administered at the beginning (pre) and end (post) of the training intervention. Individual training ranges were calculated from the pre-MSSP in accordance with Carmichael Training Systems. Laboratory assessments of PT(lact), Pmax, and VO2max were made on 24 of the participants the same weeks MSSP was evaluated. After training, MSSP increased 9.2% (195.4 +/- 56.6 vs. 213.8 +/- 57.2 W; p < 0.05), and PT(lact) increased 12.9% (178.3 +/- 47.1 vs. 201.5 +/- 47.6 W; p < 0.05). The MSSP was approximately 7.5 % higher than PT(lact). Pmax increased approximately 6.7% (315.2 +/- 65.1 to 336.5 +/- 65.9 W), and VO2max increased approximately 6.5% (46.2 +/- 10.7 to 49.1 +/- 10.5 ml x kg(-1) x min(-1)). The MSSP and PT(lact) were highly correlated (r = 0.98) as was MSSP and VO2max (r = 0.90). The results of this research indicated that (a) the field test is a valid measure of fitness and changes in fitness, (b) it provided data for the establishment of training ranges, and (c) a biweekly power-based training program can elicit significant changes in fitness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17313274     DOI: 10.1519/00124278-200702000-00047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of physiological response to cardiopulmonary exercise testing among cancer survivors and healthy controls.

Authors:  Riggs J Klika; Katharina S Golik; Scott N Drum; Kathleen E Callahan; William G Thorland
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-12-03       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Traditional Versus Velocity-Based Resistance Training in Competitive Female Cyclists: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Almudena Montalvo-Pérez; Lidia B Alejo; Pedro L Valenzuela; Jaime Gil-Cabrera; Eduardo Talavera; Alejandro Luia; David Barranco-Gil
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Comparative analysis of endurance, strength and body composition indicators in professional, under-23 and junior cyclists.

Authors:  Lidia B Alejo; Almudena Montalvo-Pérez; Pedro L Valenzuela; Carlos Revuelta; Laureano M Ozcoidi; Víctor de la Calle; Manuel Mateo-March; Alejandro Lucia; Alfredo Santalla; David Barranco-Gil
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-08-05       Impact factor: 4.755

4.  Motorless cadence control of standard and low duty cycle-patterned neural stimulation intensity extends muscle-driven cycling output after paralysis.

Authors:  Kristen Gelenitis; Kevin Foglyano; Lisa Lombardo; John McDaniel; Ronald Triolo
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2022-08-09       Impact factor: 5.208

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.