Literature DB >> 27928204

A Feasibility Study Related To Inactive Cancer Survivors Compared with Non-Cancer Controls during Aerobic Exercise Training.

Scott N Drum1, Riggs J Klika2, Susan D Carter3, Lisa K Sprod4, Lars Donath5.   

Abstract

Cancer survivors (CA) tend to demonstrate metabolic, cardiac, and ventilatory alterations due to previous chemotherapy and radiation that may impair adaptability following aerobic exercise training. Exercise training adaptations of CA finished with primary treatment compared to non-cancer participants (NC) have not yet been extensively elucidated. Thus, the present study compared physiologic responses of CA versus NC following a low-to-moderate intensity, 8-wk aerobic training program. Thirty-seven previously sedentary participants (CA: n = 14, 12 females; NC: n = 23, 19 females) with no heart or metabolic disease did not differ in age, height, weight, and body mass index (51 ± 2 y, 1.66 ± 0.02 m, 83.8 ± 3.2 kg, and 30.5 ± 1 kg·m-2). Each participant underwent baseline, 3-, 6-, and 8-wk VO2peak treadmill testing using the USAFSAM protocol and walked on a treadmill three times per week at 80-90% of ventilatory threshold (VT) for approximately 40-min·session-1. Variables obtained on the VO2peak tests included: HR at stage 2 (HR@stage2), rating of perceived exertion at stage 2 (RPE@stage2), lactate threshold (LT), ventilatory threshold (VT), salivary cortisol at 30-min post VO2peak test (SC@30-minPost),VO2peak level, time of fatigue (TOF), and maximal heart rate (HRmax). NC had significantly (p < 0.05) higher VO2peak, TOF, and HRmax at baseline, 3- and 6-wks of training but not at 8-wks. There were no differences between groups on RPE@stage2 except at baseline (p < 0.05). A significant (p < 0.05) interaction was observed only for RPE@stage2 with CA rating their initial RPE significantly greater at baseline versus NC. CA notably improved submaximal and maximal exercise capacity during 8 weeks of aerobic training and did not show altered adaptability compared to NC. We suggest prescribing aerobic exercise training at low/moderate intensity and duration initially, with progressive increases in duration and intensity after approximately 8-weeks. If available and supported, we advise clinicians to utilize submaximal threshold concepts obtained from cardiopulmonary exercise testing to prescribe more precise aerobic exercise training parameters.

Entities:  

Keywords:  VO2peak; Ventilatory threshold; cortisol; rating of perceived exertion

Year:  2016        PMID: 27928204      PMCID: PMC5131212     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  42 in total

1.  Effect of exercise at three exercise intensities on salivary cortisol.

Authors:  Dean E Jacks; James Sowash; John Anning; Thomas McGloughlin; Fredrick Andres
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  Physical exercise in cancer patients during and after medical treatment: a systematic review of randomized and controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Ruud Knols; Neil K Aaronson; Daniel Uebelhart; Jaap Fransen; Geert Aufdemkampe
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 3.  Salivary cortisol in psychoneuroendocrine research: recent developments and applications.

Authors:  C Kirschbaum; D H Hellhammer
Journal:  Psychoneuroendocrinology       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.905

Review 4.  Review and critique of the quality of exercise recommendations for cancer patients and survivors.

Authors:  Nancy Humpel; Donald C Iverson
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2005-04-12       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 5.  Exercise and cancer rehabilitation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Rosalind R Spence; Kristiann C Heesch; Wendy J Brown
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rev       Date:  2009-12-04       Impact factor: 12.111

6.  Effects of endurance training on the physical performance of patients with hematological malignancies during chemotherapy.

Authors:  Fernando Dimeo; Stefan Schwartz; Thomas Fietz; Tabata Wanjura; Dieter Böning; Eckhard Thiel
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 7.  Physical exercise results in the improved subjective well-being of a few or is effective rehabilitation for all cancer patients?

Authors:  L M Oldervoll; S Kaasa; M J Hjermstad; J A Lund; J H Loge
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 9.162

8.  Effect of endurance exercise training on ventilatory function in older individuals.

Authors:  J E Yerg; D R Seals; J M Hagberg; J O Holloszy
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1985-03

9.  Evaluation of blood lactate elevation as an intensity criterion for exercise training.

Authors:  R Casaburi; T W Storer; C S Sullivan; K Wasserman
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Psychiatric problems in the first year after mastectomy.

Authors:  G P Maguire; E G Lee; D J Bevington; C S Küchemann; R J Crabtree; C E Cornell
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1978-04-15
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Effects of Exercise Programs on Physical Factors and Safety in Adult Patients with Cancer and Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Erica Morales-Rodriguez; Txomin Pérez-Bilbao; Alejandro F San Juan; Jorge Lorenzo Calvo
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 2.  Efficacy of Complementary Therapies in the Quality of Life of Breast Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Sahar Zaidi; Showket Hussain; Shalini Verma; Zubia Veqar; Asiya Khan; Sheeraz Un Nazir; Neha Singh; Jamal Ali Moiz; Pranay Tanwar; Anurag Srivastava; G K Rath; Ravi Mehrotra
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-01-11       Impact factor: 6.244

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.