Owen M Katalinic1, Lisa A Harvey, Robert D Herbert. 1. Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Northern Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Contractures are a disabling complication of neurological conditions that are commonly managed with stretch. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of stretch for the treatment and prevention of contractures. The review is part of a more-detailed Cochrane review. Only the results of the studies including patients with neurological conditions are reported here. DATA SOURCES: Electronic searches were conducted in June 2010 in the following computerized databases: Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), Health Technology Assessment Database (HTA), MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, SCI-EXPANDED, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The review included randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials of stretch applied for the purposes of treating or preventing contractures in people with neurological conditions. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The primary outcome measures were joint mobility (range of motion) and quality of life. Secondary outcome measures were pain, spasticity, activity limitation, and participation restriction. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies provide moderate-quality evidence that stretch has a small immediate effect on joint mobility (mean difference=3°, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0° to 5°) and high-quality evidence that stretch has little or no short-term or long-term effects on joint mobility (mean difference=1° and 0°, respectively, 95% CI=0° to 3° and -2° to 2°, respectively). There is little or no effect of stretch on pain, spasticity, and activity limitation. LIMITATIONS: No studies were retrieved that investigated the effects of stretch for longer than 6 months. CONCLUSION: Regular stretch does not produce clinically important changes in joint mobility, pain, spasticity, or activity limitation in people with neurological conditions.
BACKGROUND: Contractures are a disabling complication of neurological conditions that are commonly managed with stretch. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of stretch for the treatment and prevention of contractures. The review is part of a more-detailed Cochrane review. Only the results of the studies including patients with neurological conditions are reported here. DATA SOURCES: Electronic searches were conducted in June 2010 in the following computerized databases: Cochrane CENTRAL Register of Controlled Trials, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects (DARE), Health Technology Assessment Database (HTA), MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, SCI-EXPANDED, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The review included randomized controlled trials and controlled clinical trials of stretch applied for the purposes of treating or preventing contractures in people with neurological conditions. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS: Two reviewers independently selected studies, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. The primary outcome measures were joint mobility (range of motion) and quality of life. Secondary outcome measures were pain, spasticity, activity limitation, and participation restriction. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models. RESULTS: Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. These studies provide moderate-quality evidence that stretch has a small immediate effect on joint mobility (mean difference=3°, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0° to 5°) and high-quality evidence that stretch has little or no short-term or long-term effects on joint mobility (mean difference=1° and 0°, respectively, 95% CI=0° to 3° and -2° to 2°, respectively). There is little or no effect of stretch on pain, spasticity, and activity limitation. LIMITATIONS: No studies were retrieved that investigated the effects of stretch for longer than 6 months. CONCLUSION: Regular stretch does not produce clinically important changes in joint mobility, pain, spasticity, or activity limitation in people with neurological conditions.
Authors: Antoine Nordez; Raphaël Gross; Ricardo Andrade; Guillaume Le Sant; Sandro Freitas; Richard Ellis; Peter J McNair; François Hug Journal: Sports Med Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Kazuki Hotta; Bradley J Behnke; Bahram Arjmandi; Payal Ghosh; Bei Chen; Rachael Brooks; Joshua J Maraj; Marcus L Elam; Patrick Maher; Daniel Kurien; Alexandra Churchill; Jaime L Sepulveda; Max B Kabolowsky; Demetra D Christou; Judy M Muller-Delp Journal: J Physiol Date: 2018-04-05 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Allan Colver; Ute Thyen; Catherine Arnaud; Eva Beckung; Jerome Fauconnier; Marco Marcelli; Vicki McManus; Susan I Michelsen; Jackie Parkes; Kathryn Parkinson; Heather O Dickinson Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2012-07-27 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Anastasia V P Keller; Grace Wainwright; Alice Shum-Siu; Daniella Prince; Alyssa Hoeper; Emily Martin; David S K Magnuson Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2016-08-23 Impact factor: 5.269