Literature DB >> 21123868

Spatial dependence and mitigation of radiation damage by a line-focus mini-beam.

Y Zou Finfrock1, Edward A Stern, Yizhak Yacoby, R W Alkire, Kenneth Evans-Lutterodt, Aaron Stein, Abdel F Isakovic, Joshua J Kas, Andrzej Joachimiak.   

Abstract

Recently, strategies to reduce primary radiation damage have been proposed which depend on focusing X-rays to dimensions smaller than the penetration depth of excited photoelectrons. For a line focus as used here the penetration depth is the maximum distance from the irradiated region along the X-ray polarization direction that the photoelectrons penetrate. Reported here are measurements of the penetration depth and distribution of photoelectron damage excited by 18.6 keV photons in a lysozyme crystal. The experimental results showed that the penetration depth of ~17.35 keV photoelectrons is 1.5 ± 0.2 µm, which is well below previous theoretical estimates of 2.8 µm. Such a small penetration depth raises challenging technical issues in mitigating damage by line-focus mini-beams. The optimum requirements to reduce damage in large crystals by a factor of 2.0-2.5 are Gaussian line-focus mini-beams with a root-mean-square width of 0.2 µm and a distance between lines of 2.0 µm. The use of higher energy X-rays (> 26 keV) would help to alleviate some of these requirements by more than doubling the penetration depth. It was found that the X-ray dose has a significant contribution from the crystal's solvent, which initially contained 9.0%(w/v) NaCl. The 15.8 keV photoelectrons of the Cl atoms and their accompanying 2.8 keV local dose from the decay of the resulting excited atoms more than doubles the dose deposited in the X-ray-irradiated region because of the much greater cross-section and higher energy of the excited atom, degrading the mitigation of radiation damage from 2.5 to 2.0. Eliminating heavier atoms from the solvent and data collection far from heavy-atom absorption edges will significantly improve the mitigation of damage by line-focus mini-beams.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21123868     DOI: 10.1107/S0907444910036875

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr        ISSN: 0907-4449


  9 in total

1.  Dark progression reveals slow timescales for radiation damage between T = 180 and 240 K.

Authors:  Matthew Warkentin; Ryan Badeau; Jesse Hopkins; Robert E Thorne
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2011-08-09

2.  Can radiation damage to protein crystals be reduced using small-molecule compounds?

Authors:  Jan Kmetko; Matthew Warkentin; Ulrich Englich; Robert E Thorne
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2011-09-08

3.  Imaging local electric fields produced upon synchrotron X-ray exposure.

Authors:  Christopher M Dettmar; Justin A Newman; Scott J Toth; Michael Becker; Robert F Fischetti; Garth J Simpson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-31       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Global radiation damage: temperature dependence, time dependence and how to outrun it.

Authors:  Matthew Warkentin; Jesse B Hopkins; Ryan Badeau; Anne M Mulichak; Lisa J Keefe; Robert E Thorne
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 2.616

5.  Radiation damage in protein crystals is reduced with a micron-sized X-ray beam.

Authors:  Ruslan Sanishvili; Derek W Yoder; Sudhir Babu Pothineni; Gerd Rosenbaum; Shenglan Xu; Stefan Vogt; Sergey Stepanov; Oleg A Makarov; Stephen Corcoran; Richard Benn; Venugopalan Nagarajan; Janet L Smith; Robert F Fischetti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Micro-crystallography comes of age.

Authors:  Janet L Smith; Robert F Fischetti; Masaki Yamamoto
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 6.809

7.  Bragg coherent diffraction imaging and metrics for radiation damage in protein micro-crystallography.

Authors:  H D Coughlan; C Darmanin; H J Kirkwood; N W Phillips; D Hoxley; J N Clark; D J Vine; F Hofmann; R J Harder; E Maxey; B Abbey
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.616

8.  Lifetimes and spatio-temporal response of protein crystals in intense X-ray microbeams.

Authors:  Matthew A Warkentin; Hakan Atakisi; Jesse B Hopkins; Donald Walko; Robert E Thorne
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 4.769

9.  Resolution and dose dependence of radiation damage in biomolecular systems.

Authors:  Hakan Atakisi; Lauren Conger; David W Moreau; Robert E Thorne
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.769

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.