Literature DB >> 21123769

Performance of drusen detection by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography.

Ferdinand G Schlanitz1, Christian Ahlers, Stefan Sacu, Christopher Schütze, Marcos Rodriguez, Sabine Schriefl, Isabelle Golbaz, Tobias Spalek, Geraldine Stock, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of automated analyses integrated in three spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) devices to identify drusen in eyes with early (i.e., nonatrophic and nonneovascular) age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
METHODS: Twelve eyes of 12 AMD patients, classified as AREDS 2 and 3 and having a mean count of 113 drusen were examined with three clinical SD-OCT devices (Cirrus [Carl Zeiss Meditec, Dublin CA], 3DOCT-1000 [Topcon, Tokyo, Japan], and Spectralis [Heidelberg Engineering, GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany]) and five different scan patterns. After standard automated segmentation of the RPE was performed, every druse in each B-scan was identified and graded by two independent expert graders. Errors in the segmentation performance were classified as negligible, moderate, or severe. Correlations were based on the diameter and height of the druse and its automated segmentation. The overall drusen pattern identified by experts' detailed delineation was plotted with a custom-made computer program to compare automated to manual identification outcomes.
RESULTS: A total of 1356 drusen were analyzed. The automated segmentation of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) by Cirrus made significantly fewer errors in detecting drusen than did the 3DOCT-1000 (P < 0.001). The Cirrus 200 × 200 scan pattern detected 30% of the drusen with negligible errors. Spectralis did not offer a true RPE segmentation. The drusen counts by expert graders were significantly higher in the scans than in the standard fundus photographs (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: SD-OCT imaging proved an excellent performance in visualizing drusen-related RPE disease. However, the available automated segmentation algorithms showed distinct limitations to reliable identification of the amount of drusen, particularly smaller drusen, and the actual size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21123769     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.10-5288

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  14 in total

1.  Automated segmentation of intramacular layers in Fourier domain optical coherence tomography structural images from normal subjects.

Authors:  Xusheng Zhang; Siavash Yousefi; Lin An; Ruikang K Wang
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.170

2.  Multi-surface segmentation of OCT images with AMD using sparse high order potentials.

Authors:  Jorge Oliveira; Sérgio Pereira; Luís Gonçalves; Manuel Ferreira; Carlos A Silva
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 3.732

3.  Comparison of drusen area detected by spectral domain optical coherence tomography and color fundus imaging.

Authors:  Zohar Yehoshua; Giovanni Gregori; SriniVas R Sadda; Fernando M Penha; Raquel Goldhardt; Muneeswar G Nittala; Ranjith K Konduru; William J Feuer; Pooja Gupta; Ying Li; Philip J Rosenfeld
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Automated intraretinal segmentation of SD-OCT images in normal and age-related macular degeneration eyes.

Authors:  Luis de Sisternes; Gowtham Jonna; Jason Moss; Michael F Marmor; Theodore Leng; Daniel L Rubin
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 3.732

5.  Changes in macular drusen parameters preceding the development of neovascular age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  Ali Lamin; Adam M Dubis; Sobha Sivaprasad
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Automated drusen detection in dry age-related macular degeneration by multiple-depth, en face optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Rui Zhao; Acner Camino; Jie Wang; Ahmed M Hagag; Yansha Lu; Steven T Bailey; Christina J Flaxel; Thomas S Hwang; David Huang; Dengwang Li; Yali Jia
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Change in drusen area over time compared using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography and color fundus imaging.

Authors:  Giovanni Gregori; Zohar Yehoshua; Carlos Alexandre de Amorim Garcia Filho; SriniVas R Sadda; Renata Portella Nunes; William J Feuer; Philip J Rosenfeld
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Retinal thickness measured by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in eyes without retinal abnormalities: the Beaver Dam Eye Study.

Authors:  Chelsea E Myers; Barbara E K Klein; Stacy M Meuer; Maria K Swift; Charles S Chandler; Yijun Huang; Sapna Gangaputra; Jeong W Pak; Ronald P Danis; Ronald Klein
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Optimisation of an automated drusen-quantifying software for the analysis of drusen distribution in patients with age-related macular degeneration.

Authors:  B B Ong; N Lee; W P Lee; E Pearce; S Sivaprasad; C C Klaver; R T Smith; N V Chong
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-01-11       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 10.  Polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography in the human eye.

Authors:  Michael Pircher; Christoph K Hitzenberger; Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2011-06-26       Impact factor: 21.198

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.