Literature DB >> 21123537

Comparison of two commercial molecular assays to a laboratory-developed molecular assay for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Tess Karre1, Lynne Sloan, Robin Patel, Jayawant Mandrekar, Jon Rosenblatt.   

Abstract

We compared two commercial PCR assays, the Prodesse ProGastro CD assay and the BD GeneOhm Cdiff assay, with a laboratory-developed Clostridium difficile toxin PCR assay with previously established performance characteristics. Results of all methods were in agreement for 333 (96%) of 346 stool specimens. No significant difference in performance among the assays was found (P values, >0.05).

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2010        PMID： 21123537      PMCID： PMC3043497          DOI： 10.1128/JCM.01028-10

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN： 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  14 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  John G Bartlett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Evaluation of real-time PCR and conventional diagnostic methods for the detection of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea in a prospective multicentre study.

Authors:  Renate J van den Berg; Norbert Vaessen; Hubert P Endtz; Tanja Schülin; Eric R van der Vorm; Ed J Kuijper
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.472

3.  Detection of Clostridium difficile toxin: comparison of enzyme immunoassay results with results obtained by cytotoxicity assay.

Authors:  Daniel M Musher; Atisha Manhas; Pranav Jain; Franziska Nuila; Amna Waqar; Nancy Logan; Bernard Marino; Edward A Graviss
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-06-13       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Rapid polymerase chain reaction method for specific detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  A Arzese; G Trani; L Riul; G A Botta
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Comparison of the TOX A/B test to a cell culture cytotoxicity assay for the detection of Clostridium difficile in stools.

Authors:  W E Aldeen; M Bingham; A Aiderzada; J Kucera; S Jense; K C Carroll
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.803

6.  Six rapid tests for direct detection of Clostridium difficile and its toxins in fecal samples compared with the fibroblast cytotoxicity assay.

Authors:  David K Turgeon; Thomas J Novicki; John Quick; LaDonna Carlson; Pat Miller; Bruce Ulness; Anne Cent; Rhoda Ashley; Ann Larson; Marie Coyle; Ajit P Limaye; Brad T Cookson; Thomas R Fritsche
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Rapid detection of Clostridium difficile in feces by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Simon D Bélanger; Maurice Boissinot; Natalie Clairoux; François J Picard; Michel G Bergeron
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Comparison of nine commercially available Clostridium difficile toxin detection assays, a real-time PCR assay for C. difficile tcdB, and a glutamate dehydrogenase detection assay to cytotoxin testing and cytotoxigenic culture methods.

Authors:  Kerrie Eastwood; Patrick Else; André Charlett; Mark Wilcox
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 9.  Clostridium difficile: history of its role as an enteric pathogen and the current state of knowledge about the organism.

Authors:  J G Bartlett
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 9.079

10.  Detection of toxigenic Clostridium difficile in stool samples by real-time polymerase chain reaction for the diagnosis of C. difficile-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  Lance R Peterson; Rebecca U Manson; Suzanne M Paule; Donna M Hacek; Ari Robicsek; Richard B Thomson; Karen L Kaul
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2007-09-25       Impact factor: 9.079
View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Molecular techniques for diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  John C O'Horo; Amy Jones; Matthew Sternke; Christopher Harper; Nasia Safdar
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 2.  Multiplex Molecular Panels for Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Infection: Performance, Result Interpretation, and Cost-Effectiveness.

Authors:  Matthew J Binnicker
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection can molecular amplification methods move us out of uncertainty?

Authors:  Fred C Tenover; Ellen Jo Baron; Lance R Peterson; David H Persing
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2011-08-18       Impact factor: 5.568

4.  Comparative evaluation of two commercial multiplex panels for detection of gastrointestinal pathogens by use of clinical stool specimens.

Authors:  Reeti Khare; Mark J Espy; Elizabeth Cebelinski; David Boxrud; Lynne M Sloan; Scott A Cunningham; Bobbi S Pritt; Robin Patel; Matthew J Binnicker
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Laboratory Tests for the Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Karen C Carroll; Masako Mizusawa
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2020-02-25

6.  Evolution of testing algorithms at a university hospital for detection of Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  Karissa Culbreath; Edward Ager; Ronald J Nemeyer; Alan Kerr; Peter H Gilligan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Impact of clinical symptoms on interpretation of diagnostic assays for Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  Erik R Dubberke; Zhuolin Han; Linda Bobo; Tiffany Hink; Brenda Lawrence; Susan Copper; Joan Hoppe-Bauer; Carey-Ann D Burnham; William Michael Dunne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-22       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Evaluation of a rapid membrane enzyme immunoassay for the simultaneous detection of glutamate dehydrogenase and toxin for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Heejung Kim; Wan Hee Kim; Myungsook Kim; Seok Hoon Jeong; Kyungwon Lee
Journal:  Ann Lab Med       Date:  2014-04-08       Impact factor: 3.464

9.  A Laboratory Medicine Best Practices Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests (NAATs) and Algorithms Including NAATs for the Diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile in Adults.

Authors:  Colleen S Kraft; J Scott Parrott; Nancy E Cornish; Matthew L Rubinstein; Alice S Weissfeld; Peggy McNult; Irving Nachamkin; Romney M Humphries; Thomas J Kirn; Jennifer Dien Bard; Joseph D Lutgring; Jonathan C Gullett; Cassiana E Bittencourt; Susan Benson; April M Bobenchik; Robert L Sautter; Vickie Baselski; Michel C Atlas; Elizabeth M Marlowe; Nancy S Miller; Monika Fischer; Sandra S Richter; Peter Gilligan; James W Snyder
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Using a dog's superior olfactory sensitivity to identify Clostridium difficile in stools and patients: proof of principle study.

Authors:  Marije K Bomers; Michiel A van Agtmael; Hotsche Luik; Merk C van Veen; Christina M J E Vandenbroucke-Grauls; Yvo M Smulders
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-12-13
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.