Literature DB >> 2111987

Genotype and anesthetic determine mate choice in Drosophila melanogaster.

D Joachim1, J W Curtsinger.   

Abstract

Genetic differences that influence mating preferences were studied in genetically defined lines of Drosophila melanogaster. Initial results suggested substantial differences between two types of females with respect to the types of male preferred as mates, but further experimentation showed that the mating patterns were conditional on the mode of anesthesia (CO2 versus ether). In a statistical test of independence, the major determinant of mating choice in these experiments was due to an interaction effect between genotypes and mode of anesthesia. The observations might be explained by the differential sensitivity of male genotypes to ether. Etherization at emergence has lasting effects on mating behavior; it alters not only the latency and frequency of mating 4 days later, but also the pattern of matings observed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2111987     DOI: 10.1007/bf01070742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  4 in total

1.  Quantitative genetic variation of enzyme activities in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  C C Laurie-Ahlberg; G Maroni; G C Bewley; J C Lucchesi; B S Weir
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1980-02       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Genetic Variability of Flight Metabolism in DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. I. Characterization of Power Output during Tethered Flight.

Authors:  J W Curtsinger; C C Laurie-Ahlberg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Components of selection in X chromosome lines of Drosophila melanogaster: sex ratio modification by meiotic drive and viability selection.

Authors:  J W Curtsinger
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  A rare-male advantage in the housefly induced by wing clipping and some general considerations for Drosophila.

Authors:  E H Bryant; A Kence; K T Kimball
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1980-12       Impact factor: 4.562

  4 in total
  4 in total

1.  Learning and memory during aggression in Drosophila: handling affects aggression and the formation of a "loser" effect.

Authors:  Severine Trannoy; Edward A Kravitz
Journal:  J Nat Sci       Date:  2015

2.  A New Approach that Eliminates Handling for Studying Aggression and the "Loser" Effect in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Severine Trannoy; Budhaditya Chowdhury; Edward A Kravitz
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 1.355

3.  The effect of anesthesia on the photoresponses of four sympatric species of Drosophila.

Authors:  M B Seiger; J F Kink
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  Handling alters aggression and "loser" effect formation in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Severine Trannoy; Budhaditya Chowdhury; Edward A Kravitz
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 2.460

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.