Literature DB >> 8476397

The effect of anesthesia on the photoresponses of four sympatric species of Drosophila.

M B Seiger1, J F Kink.   

Abstract

Five isofemale strains from each of four sympatric species, Drosophila immigrans, D. repleta, D. melanogaster, and D. affinis, were lightly anesthetized with ether, CO2, Flynap, or cold temperature. The photoresponse of each treatment group was measured in an open field and a Y-tube apparatus. Relative light values were compared with those of the unanesthetized control groups of each species, as well as among the different treatments themselves and among species. Significant differences between species were apparent for all treatments in the Y-tube and for all treatments except ether and CO2 in the open field. Response to anesthesia may differ between species due, in part, to their differing genotypes. Comparing treatment groups within species in the Y-tube design, all species except D. melanogaster showed significant differences between treatments. In the open field, only D. affinis was significantly affected. Particularly in the Y-tube, anesthetized flies generally differed significantly from the controls, indicating that the use of anesthesia during a behavioral study could cause deviations in behavior from that of normal unanesthetized flies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8476397     DOI: 10.1007/bf01067559

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  17 in total

1.  Genotype and anesthetic determine mate choice in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  D Joachim; J W Curtsinger
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 2.805

2.  A MULTIFACTORIAL BEHAVIORAL STUDY OF COEXISTING DROSOPHILID SPECIES IN NATURE.

Authors:  Marvin B Seiger; H J Khamis
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  A comparative study of photoresponse in prosophila pseudoobscura and Drosophila persimils.

Authors:  R F Rockwell; M B Seiger
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 2.805

4.  A genetic analysis of phototactic behavior in Drosophila melanogaster I. Selection in the presence of inversions.

Authors:  T A Markow
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1975-03       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Effect of age and of screening pigment mutations on the phototactic behavior of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  T A Markow; N J Scavarda
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.805

6.  Carbon dioxide induced changes in the electroretinogram of drosophila unaccompanied by altered phototactic behaviour.

Authors:  P T Wong; W D Kaplan; W E Trout; B Hanstein
Journal:  J Insect Physiol       Date:  1972-08       Impact factor: 2.354

7.  Genetic analysis of phototactic behavior in Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  T A Markow; W L Smith
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1977-02       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  A genetic analysis of phototactic behavior in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Hybridization of divergent populations.

Authors:  T A Markow
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1975-10       Impact factor: 2.805

9.  Phototactic responses along a gradient of light intensities for the sibling species Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans.

Authors:  P A Parsons
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.805

10.  The genetics of resistance to long-term exposure to CO2 in Drosophila melanogaster; an environmental stress leading to anoxia.

Authors:  A C Matheson; P A Parsons
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1973-01       Impact factor: 5.699

View more
  5 in total

1.  A low-cost method for analyzing seizure-like activity and movement in Drosophila.

Authors:  Bryan Stone; Brian Burke; Joseph Pathakamuri; John Coleman; Daniel Kuebler
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  Basic reversal-learning capacity in flies suggests rudiments of complex cognition.

Authors:  Brad R Foley; Paul Marjoram; Sergey V Nuzhdin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A decision underlies phototaxis in an insect.

Authors:  E Axel Gorostiza; Julien Colomb; Björn Brembs
Journal:  Open Biol       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 6.411

4.  Excessive energy expenditure due to acute physical restraint disrupts Drosophila motivational feeding response.

Authors:  Jacob Gordon; Pavel Masek
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Real-time telemetry monitoring of oxygen in the central complex of freely-walking Gromphadorhina portentosa.

Authors:  Pier Andrea Serra; Paola Arrigo; Andrea Bacciu; Daniele Zuncheddu; Riccardo Deliperi; Diego Antón Viana; Patrizia Monti; Maria Vittoria Varoni; Maria Alessandra Sotgiu; Pasquale Bandiera; Gaia Rocchitta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.