Literature DB >> 21118699

Behavioral effects on rats of motion within a high static magnetic field.

Thomas A Houpt1, Lee Carella, Dani Gonzalez, Ilana Janowitz, Anthony Mueller, Kathleen Mueller, Bryan Neth, James C Smith.   

Abstract

Some human subjects report vestibular disturbances such as vertigo, apparent motion, and nausea around or within high strength MRI systems operating at 4 T to 9.4 T. These vestibular effects have been ascribed to the consequences of movement through the high magnetic field. We have previously found that exposure to magnetic fields above 7 T suppresses rearing, causes locomotor circling, and induces conditioned taste aversion (CTA) in rodents. The present experiments were designed to test the effects on rats of motion through the magnetic field of the 14.1 T superconducting magnet. In Experiment 1, we compared the effects of multiple rapid insertions and removals from the center of the magnet to the effects of continuous exposure. Repeated traversal of the magnetic field gradient with only momentary exposure to 14.1 T was sufficient to suppress rearing and induce a significant CTA. Repeated insertion and removal from the magnet, however, did not have a greater effect than a single 30-min exposure on either acute locomotor behavior or CTA acquisition. Prolonged exposure was required to induce locomotor circling. In the second series of experiments, we controlled the rate of insertion and removal by means of an electric motor. Locomotor circling appeared to be dependent on the speed of insertion and removal, but the suppression of rearing and the acquisition of CTA were independent of speed of insertion and removal. In Experiment 3, we inserted rats into the center of the magnet and then rotated them about their rostral-caudal axis during a 30-min 14.1 T exposure. Rotation within the magnet did not modulate the behavioral effects of exposure. We conclude that, in rats, movement through the steep gradient of a high magnetic field has some behavioral effects, but sustained exposure to the homogenous center of the field is required for the full behavioral consequences. 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21118699      PMCID: PMC3061403          DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2010.11.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiol Behav        ISSN: 0031-9384


  33 in total

Review 1.  Health and physiological effects of human exposure to whole-body four-tesla magnetic fields during MRI.

Authors:  J F Schenck
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1992-03-31       Impact factor: 5.691

2.  Maturation and open-field behavior in rats exposed prenatally to an ELF low-intensity rotating magnetic field.

Authors:  K P Ossenkopp
Journal:  Psychol Rep       Date:  1972-04

3.  Rotation-induced conditioned rejection in the taste reactivity test.

Authors:  N Cordick; L A Parker; K P Ossenkopp
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1999-05-14       Impact factor: 1.837

Review 4.  Physical interactions of static magnetic fields with living tissues.

Authors:  John F Schenck
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2005 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 3.667

5.  Numerical evaluation of the fields induced by body motion in or near high-field MRI scanners.

Authors:  Stuart Crozier; Feng Liu
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2005 Feb-Apr       Impact factor: 3.667

6.  Magnetic field conditioned taste aversion in rats.

Authors:  C M Nolte; D W Pittman; B Kalevitch; R Henderson; J C Smith
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1998-02-15

7.  Off-vertical rotation produces conditioned taste aversion and suppressed drinking in mice.

Authors:  R A Fox; A H Lauber; N G Daunton; M Phillips; L Diaz
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1984-07

8.  Effect of static magnetic field exposure of up to 8 Tesla on sequential human vital sign measurements.

Authors:  Donald W Chakeres; Alayar Kangarlu; Harisios Boudoulas; Donn C Young
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Taste avoidance and taste aversion: evidence for two different processes.

Authors:  Linda A Parker
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.986

10.  Human exposure to 4.0-Tesla magnetic fields in a whole-body scanner.

Authors:  J F Schenck; C L Dumoulin; R W Redington; H Y Kressel; R T Elliott; I L McDougall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  7 in total

1.  MRI magnetic field stimulates rotational sensors of the brain.

Authors:  Dale C Roberts; Vincenzo Marcelli; Joseph S Gillen; John P Carey; Charles C Della Santina; David S Zee
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 2.  Vestibular stimulation by magnetic fields.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Dale C Roberts; Charles C Della Santina; John P Carey; David S Zee
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Head tilt in rats during exposure to a high magnetic field.

Authors:  Thomas A Houpt; Jennifer Cassell; Lee Carella; Bryan Neth; James C Smith
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2011-08-31

4.  Orientation within a high magnetic field determines swimming direction and laterality of c-Fos induction in mice.

Authors:  Thomas A Houpt; Bumsup Kwon; Charles E Houpt; Bryan Neth; James C Smith
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Long-term behavioral effects observed in mice chronically exposed to static ultra-high magnetic fields.

Authors:  Ivan Tkáč; Michael A Benneyworth; Tessa Nichols-Meade; Elizabeth L Steuer; Sarah N Larson; Gregory J Metzger; Kâmil Uğurbil
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Effect of head pitch and roll orientations on magnetically induced vertigo.

Authors:  Omar S Mian; Yan Li; Andre Antunes; Paul M Glover; Brian L Day
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  Review of Audiovestibular Symptoms Following Exposure to Acoustic and Electromagnetic Energy Outside Conventional Human Hearing.

Authors:  Rory J Lubner; Neil S Kondamuri; Renata M Knoll; Bryan K Ward; Philip D Littlefield; Derek Rodgers; Kalil G Abdullah; Aaron K Remenschneider; Elliott D Kozin
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 4.003

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.