Literature DB >> 23720133

Orientation within a high magnetic field determines swimming direction and laterality of c-Fos induction in mice.

Thomas A Houpt1, Bumsup Kwon, Charles E Houpt, Bryan Neth, James C Smith.   

Abstract

High-strength static magnetic fields (>7 tesla) perturb the vestibular system causing dizziness, nystagmus, and nausea in humans; and head motion, locomotor circling, conditioned taste aversion, and c-Fos induction in brain stem vestibular nuclei in rodents. To determine the role of head orientation, mice were exposed for 15 min within a 14.1-tesla magnet at six different angles (mice oriented parallel to the field with the head toward B+ at 0°; or pitched rostrally down at 45°, 90°, 90° sideways, 135°, and 180°), followed by a 2-min swimming test. Additional mice were exposed at 0°, 90°, and 180° and processed for c-Fos immunohistochemistry. Magnetic field exposure induced circular swimming that was maximal at 0° and 180° but attenuated at 45° and 135°. Mice exposed at 0° and 45° swam counterclockwise, whereas mice exposed at 135° and 180° swam clockwise. Mice exposed at 90° (with their rostral-caudal axis perpendicular to the magnetic field) did not swim differently than controls. In parallel, exposure at 0° and 180° induced c-Fos in vestibular nuclei with left-right asymmetries that were reversed at 0° vs. 180°. No significant c-Fos was induced after 90° exposure. Thus, the optimal orientation for magnetic field effects is the rostral-caudal axis parallel to the field, such that the horizontal canal and utricle are also parallel to the field. These results have mechanistic implications for modeling magnetic field interactions with the vestibular apparatus of the inner ear (e.g., the model of Roberts et al. of an induced Lorenz force causing horizontal canal cupula deflection).

Entities:  

Keywords:  brain stem; c-Fos; magnetic field; swimming; vestibular

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23720133      PMCID: PMC3798798          DOI: 10.1152/ajpregu.00549.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol        ISSN: 0363-6119            Impact factor:   3.619


  29 in total

1.  Cognitive, cardiac, and physiological safety studies in ultra high field magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  A Kangarlu; R E Burgess; H Zhu; T Nakayama; R L Hamlin; A M Abduljalil; P M Robitaille
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.546

2.  Neurobehavioral effects among subjects exposed to high static and gradient magnetic fields from a 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging system--a case-crossover pilot study.

Authors:  Frank de Vocht; Berna van-Wendel-de-Joode; Hans Engels; Hans Kromhout
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 3.  Health and physiological effects of human exposure to whole-body four-tesla magnetic fields during MRI.

Authors:  J F Schenck
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1992-03-31       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  Subjective acceptance of 7 Tesla MRI for human imaging.

Authors:  Jens M Theysohn; Stefan Maderwald; Oliver Kraff; Christoph Moenninghoff; Mark E Ladd; Susanne C Ladd
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Translabyrinth electrical stimulation for the induction of immediate-early genes in the gerbil brainstem.

Authors:  G D Kaufman; A A Perachio
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1994-05-23       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Behavioral effects of high-strength static magnetic fields on rats.

Authors:  Thomas A Houpt; David W Pittman; Jan M Barranco; Erin H Brooks; James C Smith
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Effect of static magnetic field exposure of up to 8 Tesla on sequential human vital sign measurements.

Authors:  Donald W Chakeres; Alayar Kangarlu; Harisios Boudoulas; Donn C Young
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.813

8.  Randomized comparison of cognitive function in humans at 0 and 8 Tesla.

Authors:  Donald W Chakeres; Robert Bornstein; Allahyar Kangarlu
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.813

9.  Behavioral effects of static high magnetic fields on unrestrained and restrained mice.

Authors:  Denesa R Lockwood; Bumsup Kwon; James C Smith; Thomas A Houpt
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2003-04

10.  Human exposure to 4.0-Tesla magnetic fields in a whole-body scanner.

Authors:  J F Schenck; C L Dumoulin; R W Redington; H Y Kressel; R T Elliott; I L McDougall
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  6 in total

1.  Mouse Magnetic-field Nystagmus in Strong Static Magnetic Fields Is Dependent on the Presence of Nox3.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Yoon H Lee; Dale C Roberts; Ethan Naylor; Americo A Migliaccio; Charles C Della Santina
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 2.  Vestibular stimulation by magnetic fields.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Dale C Roberts; Charles C Della Santina; John P Carey; David S Zee
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 5.691

3.  Long-term behavioral effects observed in mice chronically exposed to static ultra-high magnetic fields.

Authors:  Ivan Tkáč; Michael A Benneyworth; Tessa Nichols-Meade; Elizabeth L Steuer; Sarah N Larson; Gregory J Metzger; Kâmil Uğurbil
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Optogenetic fMRI interrogation of brain-wide central vestibular pathways.

Authors:  Alex T L Leong; Yong Gu; Ying-Shing Chan; Hairong Zheng; Celia M Dong; Russell W Chan; Xunda Wang; Yilong Liu; Li Hai Tan; Ed X Wu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Strong static magnetic fields elicit swimming behaviors consistent with direct vestibular stimulation in adult zebrafish.

Authors:  Bryan K Ward; Grace X-J Tan; Dale C Roberts; Charles C Della Santina; David S Zee; John P Carey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of head pitch and roll orientations on magnetically induced vertigo.

Authors:  Omar S Mian; Yan Li; Andre Antunes; Paul M Glover; Brian L Day
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 5.182

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.