Literature DB >> 21114224

Monitoring microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass with the EDAC quantifier.

John E Lynch1, Christopher Wells, Tom Akers, Paul Frantz, Donna Garrett, M Lance Scott, Lisa Williamson, Barbara Agnew, John K Lynch.   

Abstract

Gaseous emboli may be introduced into the bypass circuit both from the surgical field and during perfusionist interventions. While circuits provide good protection against massive air embolism, they do not remove gaseous microemboli (GME) from the bypass circuit. The purpose of this preliminary study is to assess the incidence of GME during bypass surgery and determine if increased GME counts were associated with specific events during bypass surgery. In 30 cases divided between 15 coronary artery bypass grafts and 15 valve repairs, GME were counted and sizedt the three locations on the bypass circuit using the EDAC" Quantifier (Luna Innovations, Roanoke, VA). A mean of 45,276 GME were detected after the arterial line filter during these 30 cases, with significantly more detected (p = .04) post filter during valve cases (mean = 72,137 +/- 22,113) than coronary artery bypass graft cases (mean = 18,416 +/- 7831). GME detected post filter were significantly correlated in time with counts detected in the venous line (p < .001). Specific events associated with high counts included the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass, heart manipulations, insertion and removal of clamps, and the administration of drugs. Global factors associated with increased counts post filter included higher venous line counts and higher post reservoir/bubble trap counts. The mean number of microemboli detected during bypass surgery was much higher than reported in other studies of emboli incidence, most likely due to the increased sensitivity of the EDAC Quantifier compared to other detection modalities. The results furthermore suggest the need for further study of the clinical significance of these microemboli and what practices may be used to reduce GME incidence. Increased in vitro testing of the air handling capability of different circuit designs, along with more clinical studies assessing best clinical practices for reducing GME activity, is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21114224      PMCID: PMC4679961     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol        ISSN: 0022-1058


  15 in total

1.  Ex vivo testing of the Quart arterial line filter.

Authors:  X M Mueller; H T Tevaearai; D Jegger; M Augstburger; M Burki; L K von Segesser
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  The pathophysiology of cerebral arterial gas embolism.

Authors:  Simon Mitchell; Des Gorman
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2002-03

Review 3.  Bubbles and bypass: an update.

Authors:  Mark Kurusz; Bruce D Butler
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  In vitro evaluation of the air separation ability of four cardiovascular manufacturer extracorporeal circuit designs.

Authors:  Timothy A Dickinson; Jeffrey B Riley; Jeffrey C Crowley; Paul M Zabetakis
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2006-09

5.  Does vacuum-assisted venous drainage increase gaseous microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass?

Authors:  Timothy J Jones; Dwight D Deal; Jason C Vernon; Noel Blackburn; David A Stump
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 6.  Brain damage during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  K M Taylor
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Impact of embolization during coronary artery bypass grafting on outcome and length of stay.

Authors:  D Barbut; Y W Lo; J P Gold; R R Trifiletti; F S Yao; D N Hager; R B Hinton; O W Isom
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Arterial line filters ranked for gaseous micro-emboli separation performance: an in vitro study.

Authors:  Jeffrey B Riley
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2008-03

9.  Microemboli during coronary artery bypass grafting. Genesis and effect on outcome.

Authors:  R E Clark; J Brillman; D A Davis; M R Lovell; T R Price; G J Magovern
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Emboli occurrence during coronary artery bypass surgery: the influence of a new method of perfusionist blood sampling.

Authors:  Ld Sauren; Ej Mooren; Ee Severdija; Pw Weerwind; Jg Maessen
Journal:  Perfusion       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  5 in total

1.  The effects of pressure on gases in solution: possible insights to improve microbubble filtration for extracorporeal circulation.

Authors:  Daniel P Herbst
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2013-06

2.  Elimination of gaseous microemboli from cardiopulmonary bypass using hypobaric oxygenation.

Authors:  Keith E Gipson; David J Rosinski; Robert B Schonberger; Cathryn Kubera; Eapen S Mathew; Frank Nichols; William Dyckman; Francois Courtin; Bradford Sherburne; Angelique F Bordey; Jeffrey B Gross
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 4.330

3.  Endogenous gas formation--an in vitro study with relevance to gas microemboli during cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Lena Lindholm; Karl Gunnar Engström
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2012-09

4.  Embolic activity during in vivo cardiopulmonary bypass.

Authors:  Gordon R DeFoe; Norman A Dame; Mark S Farrell; Cathy S Ross; Craig W Langner; Donald S Likosky
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2014-06

5.  Arterial Limb Microemboli during Cardiopulmonary Bypass: Observations from a Congenital Cardiac Surgery Practice.

Authors:  Gregory S Matte; Kevin R Connor; Hua Liu; James A DiNardo; David Faraoni; Frank Pigula
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2016-03
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.