OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the time to communicate laboratory results to health centers (HCs) between the e-Chasqui web-based information system and the pre-existing paper-based system. METHODS: Cluster randomized controlled trial in 78 HCs in Peru. In the intervention group, 12 HCs had web access to results via e-Chasqui (point-of-care HCs) and forwarded results to 17 peripheral HCs. In the control group, 22 point-of-care HCs received paper results directly and forwarded them to 27 peripheral HCs. Baseline data were collected for 15 months. Post-randomization data were collected for at least 2 years. Comparisons were made between intervention and control groups, stratified by point-of-care versus peripheral HCs. RESULTS: For point-of-care HCs, the intervention group took less time to receive drug susceptibility tests (DSTs) (median 9 vs 16 days, p<0.001) and culture results (4 vs 8 days, p<0.001) and had a lower proportion of 'late' DSTs taking >60 days to arrive (p<0.001) than the control. For peripheral HCs, the intervention group had similar communication times for DST (median 22 vs 19 days, p=0.30) and culture (10 vs 9 days, p=0.10) results, as well as proportion of 'late' DSTs (p=0.57) compared with the control. CONCLUSIONS: Only point-of-care HCs with direct access to the e-Chasqui information system had reduced communication times and fewer results with delays of >2 months. Peripheral HCs had no benefits from the system. This suggests that health establishments should have point-of-care access to reap the benefits of electronic laboratory reporting.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the time to communicate laboratory results to health centers (HCs) between the e-Chasqui web-based information system and the pre-existing paper-based system. METHODS: Cluster randomized controlled trial in 78 HCs in Peru. In the intervention group, 12 HCs had web access to results via e-Chasqui (point-of-care HCs) and forwarded results to 17 peripheral HCs. In the control group, 22 point-of-care HCs received paper results directly and forwarded them to 27 peripheral HCs. Baseline data were collected for 15 months. Post-randomization data were collected for at least 2 years. Comparisons were made between intervention and control groups, stratified by point-of-care versus peripheral HCs. RESULTS: For point-of-care HCs, the intervention group took less time to receive drug susceptibility tests (DSTs) (median 9 vs 16 days, p<0.001) and culture results (4 vs 8 days, p<0.001) and had a lower proportion of 'late' DSTs taking >60 days to arrive (p<0.001) than the control. For peripheral HCs, the intervention group had similar communication times for DST (median 22 vs 19 days, p=0.30) and culture (10 vs 9 days, p=0.10) results, as well as proportion of 'late' DSTs (p=0.57) compared with the control. CONCLUSIONS: Only point-of-care HCs with direct access to the e-Chasqui information system had reduced communication times and fewer results with delays of >2 months. Peripheral HCs had no benefits from the system. This suggests that health establishments should have point-of-care access to reap the benefits of electronic laboratory reporting.
Authors: David W Bates; R Scott Evans; Harvey Murff; Peter D Stetson; Lisa Pizziferri; George Hripcsak Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2003 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Hamish S F Fraser; Darius Jazayeri; Patrice Nevil; Yusuf Karacaoglu; Paul E Farmer; Evan Lyon; Mary Kay C Smith Fawzi; Fernet Leandre; Sharon S Choi; Joia S Mukherjee Journal: BMJ Date: 2004-11-13
Authors: Sharon S Choi; Darius G Jazayeri; Carole D Mitnick; Katiuska Chalco; Jaime Bayona; Hamish S F Fraser Journal: Stud Health Technol Inform Date: 2004
Authors: Kara M Palamountain; Jeff Baker; Elliot P Cowan; Shaffiq Essajee; Laura T Mazzola; Mutsumi Metzler; Marco Schito; Wendy S Stevens; Gloria J Young; Gonzalo J Domingo Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2012-03-07 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: John D Piette; K C Lun; Lincoln A Moura; Hamish S F Fraser; Patricia N Mechael; John Powell; Shariq R Khoja Journal: Bull World Health Organ Date: 2012-05-01 Impact factor: 9.408
Authors: Joaquín A Blaya; Sonya S Shin; Martin Yagui; Carmen Contreras; Peter Cegielski; Gloria Yale; Carmen Suarez; Luis Asencios; Jaime Bayona; Jihoon Kim; Hamish S F Fraser Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-04-10 Impact factor: 3.240