OBJECTIVE: Meaningful use of electronic health records (EHRs) is dependent on accurate clinical documentation. Documenting common goals in the intensive care unit (ICU), such as sedation and ventilator management plans, may increase collaboration and decrease patient length of stay. This study analyzed the degree to which goals stated were present in the EHR. DESIGN: Descriptive correlational study of common goals verbally stated during daily ICU interdisciplinary rounds compared with the presence of those goals, and actions related to those goals, documented in the EHR over the subsequent 24 h for 28 patients over 15 days. The study setting was a neurovascular ICU with a fully implemented electronic nursing and physician documentation system. MEASUREMENTS: Descriptive statistics and χ(2) analyses were used to assess differences in EHR documentation of stated goals and goal-related actions. Inter-coder reliability was performed on 16 (13%) of the 127 stated goals. RESULTS: One-quarter of the stated goals were not documented in the EHR. If a goal was not documented, actions related to that goal were 60% less likely to be documented. The attending physician note contained 81% of the stated ventilator weaning goals, but only 49% of the sedation weaning goals; additionally, sedation goals were not part of the structured nursing documentation. Inter-coder reliability (κ) was greater than 0.82. LIMITATIONS: Observations in a single ICU setting at a large academic medical center using a commercial EHR. CONCLUSION: The current documentation tools available in EHRs may not be sufficient to capture common goals of ICU patient care.
OBJECTIVE: Meaningful use of electronic health records (EHRs) is dependent on accurate clinical documentation. Documenting common goals in the intensive care unit (ICU), such as sedation and ventilator management plans, may increase collaboration and decrease patient length of stay. This study analyzed the degree to which goals stated were present in the EHR. DESIGN: Descriptive correlational study of common goals verbally stated during daily ICU interdisciplinary rounds compared with the presence of those goals, and actions related to those goals, documented in the EHR over the subsequent 24 h for 28 patients over 15 days. The study setting was a neurovascular ICU with a fully implemented electronic nursing and physician documentation system. MEASUREMENTS: Descriptive statistics and χ(2) analyses were used to assess differences in EHR documentation of stated goals and goal-related actions. Inter-coder reliability was performed on 16 (13%) of the 127 stated goals. RESULTS: One-quarter of the stated goals were not documented in the EHR. If a goal was not documented, actions related to that goal were 60% less likely to be documented. The attending physician note contained 81% of the stated ventilator weaning goals, but only 49% of the sedation weaning goals; additionally, sedation goals were not part of the structured nursing documentation. Inter-coder reliability (κ) was greater than 0.82. LIMITATIONS: Observations in a single ICU setting at a large academic medical center using a commercial EHR. CONCLUSION: The current documentation tools available in EHRs may not be sufficient to capture common goals of ICU patient care.
Authors: Mangala Narasimhan; Lewis A Eisen; Christine D Mahoney; Frank L Acerra; Mark J Rosen Journal: Am J Crit Care Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: M H Kollef; S D Shapiro; P Silver; R E St John; D Prentice; S Sauer; T S Ahrens; W Shannon; D Baker-Clinkscale Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 1997-04 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Abbey Hyde; Margaret P Treacy; P Anne Scott; Michelle Butler; Jonathan Drennan; Kate Irving; Anne Byrne; Padraig MacNeela; Marian Hanrahan Journal: Nurs Inq Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 2.393
Authors: Anuj K Dalal; Patricia C Dykes; Sarah Collins; Lisa Soleymani Lehmann; Kumiko Ohashi; Ronen Rozenblum; Diana Stade; Kelly McNally; Constance R C Morrison; Sucheta Ravindran; Eli Mlaver; John Hanna; Frank Chang; Ravali Kandala; George Getty; David W Bates Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2015-08-02 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Sarah Collins; Ann C Hurley; Frank Y Chang; Anisha R Illa; Angela Benoit; Sarah Laperle; Patricia C Dykes Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-09-30 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Sarah A Collins; Priscilla Gazarian; Diana Stade; Kelly McNally; Conny Morrison; Kumiko Ohashi; Lisa Lehmann; Anuj Dalal; David W Bates; Patricia C Dykes Journal: AMIA Annu Symp Proc Date: 2014-11-14
Authors: Sarah Collins; Stephanie Klinkenberg-Ramirez; Kira Tsivkin; Perry L Mar; Dina Iskhakova; Hari Nandigam; Lipika Samal; Roberto A Rocha Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2017-09-20 Impact factor: 8.000
Authors: Sarina Fazio; Amy Doroy; Natalie Da Marto; Sandra Taylor; Nicholas Anderson; Heather M Young; Jason Y Adams Journal: Crit Care Explor Date: 2020-04-29
Authors: Sarah Collins Rossetti; Patricia C Dykes; Christopher Knaplund; Min-Jeoung Kang; Kumiko Schnock; Jose Pedro Garcia; Li-Heng Fu; Frank Chang; Tien Thai; Matthew Fred; Tom Z Korach; Li Zhou; Jeffrey G Klann; David Albers; Jessica Schwartz; Graham Lowenthal; Haomiao Jia; Fang Liu; Kenrick Cato Journal: JMIR Res Protoc Date: 2021-12-10
Authors: Jessalyn K Holodinsky; Marilynne A Hebert; David A Zygun; Romain Rigal; Simon Berthelot; Deborah J Cook; Henry T Stelfox Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-12-23 Impact factor: 3.240