Literature DB >> 9142019

A randomized, controlled trial of protocol-directed versus physician-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation.

M H Kollef1, S D Shapiro, P Silver, R E St John, D Prentice, S Sauer, T S Ahrens, W Shannon, D Baker-Clinkscale.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare a practice of protocol-directed weaning from mechanical ventilation implemented by nurses and respiratory therapists with traditional physician-directed weaning.
DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: Medical and surgical intensive care units in two university-affiliated teaching hospitals. PATIENTS: Patients requiring mechanical ventilation (n = 357).
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive either protocol-directed (n = 179) or physician-directed (n = 178) weaning from mechanical ventilation.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome measure was the duration of mechanical ventilation from tracheal intubation until discontinuation of mechanical ventilation. Other outcome measures included need for reintubation, length of hospital stay, hospital mortality rate, and hospital costs. The median duration of mechanical ventilation was 35 hrs for the protocol-directed group (first quartile 15 hrs; third quartile 114 hrs) compared with 44 hrs for the physician-directed group (first quartile 21 hrs; third quartile 209 hrs). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that patients randomized to protocol-directed weaning had significantly shorter durations of mechanical ventilation compared with patients randomized to physician-directed weaning (chi 2 = 3.62, p = .057, log-rank test; chi 2 = 5.12, p = .024, Wilcoxon test). Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis, adjusting for other covariates, showed that the rate of successful weaning was significantly greater for patients receiving protocol-directed weaning compared with patients receiving physician-directed weaning (risk ratio 1.31; 95% confidence interval 1.15 to 1.50; p = .039). The hospital mortality rates for the two treatment groups were similar (protocol-directed 22.3% vs. physician-directed 23.6%; p = .779). Hospital cost savings for patients in the protocol-directed group were $42,960 compared with hospital costs for patients in the physician-directed group.
CONCLUSION: Protocol-guided weaning of mechanical ventilation, as performed by nurses and respiratory therapists, is safe and led to extubation more rapidly than physician-directed weaning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9142019     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199704000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  96 in total

1.  [Protocol based ventilator weaning strategy or individual medical decision?].

Authors:  N Hochhausen; R Kuhlen
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 1.041

2.  Successful Use of Noninvasive Ventilation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. How Do High-Performing Hospitals Do It?

Authors:  Kimberly A Fisher; Kathleen M Mazor; Sarah Goff; Mihaela S Stefan; Penelope S Pekow; Lauren A Williams; Vida Rastegar; Michael B Rothberg; Nicholas S Hill; Peter K Lindenauer
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2017-11

3.  A knowledge- and model-based system for automated weaning from mechanical ventilation: technical description and first clinical application.

Authors:  Dirk Schädler; Stefan Mersmann; Inéz Frerichs; Gunnar Elke; Thomas Semmel-Griebeler; Oliver Noll; Sven Pulletz; Günther Zick; Matthias David; Wolfgang Heinrichs; Jens Scholz; Norbert Weiler
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2013-07-28       Impact factor: 2.502

4.  Ventilatory care in a selection of Ontario hospitals: bigger is not necessarily better! Critical Care Research Network (CCR-Net).

Authors:  S P Keenan; J Montgomery; L M Chen; R Esmail; K J Inman; W J Sibbald
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation as a weaning strategy for intubated adults with respiratory failure.

Authors:  Karen E A Burns; Maureen O Meade; Azra Premji; Neill K J Adhikari
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2013-12-09

Review 6.  Factors that impact on the use of mechanical ventilation weaning protocols in critically ill adults and children: a qualitative evidence-synthesis.

Authors:  Joanne Jordan; Louise Rose; Katie N Dainty; Jane Noyes; Bronagh Blackwood
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-04

7.  Development and simultaneous application of multiple care protocols in critical care: a multicenter feasibility study.

Authors:  Jukka Takala; R Philip Dellinger; Kati Koskinen; Arthur St Andre; Martyn Read; Mitchell Levy; Stephan M Jakob; Patricia Veiga C Mello; Raymond Friolet; Esko Ruokonen
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-04-03       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  No child left behind: Enrolling children and adults simultaneously in critical care randomized trials.

Authors:  Scott D Halpern; Adrienne G Randolph; Derek C Angus
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 7.598

Review 9.  Physiotherapy for adult patients with critical illness: recommendations of the European Respiratory Society and European Society of Intensive Care Medicine Task Force on Physiotherapy for Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  R Gosselink; J Bott; M Johnson; E Dean; S Nava; M Norrenberg; B Schönhofer; K Stiller; H van de Leur; J L Vincent
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 10.  [Diagnosis and therapy of sepsis. Guidelines of the German Sepsis Society Inc. and the German Interdisciplinary Society for Intensive and Emergency Medicine].

Authors:  K Reinhart; F Brunkhorst; H Bone; H Gerlach; M Gründling; G Kreymann; P Kujath; G Marggraf; K Mayer; A Meier-Hellmann; C Peckelsen; C Putensen; M Quintel; M Ragaller; R Rossaint; F Stüber; N Weiler; T Welte; K Werdan
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 0.743

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.