OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a standardized worksheet on physicians' and nurses' perceptions of their understanding of goals of care and on patients' length of stay in an intensive care unit. METHODS: A worksheet was completed daily during multidisciplinary rounds and was posted at each bedside in the medical intensive care unit at Beth Israel Medical Center in New York. Information recorded included tests or procedures, medications, sedation, analgesia, catheters, consultations, nutrition, mobilization, family discussions, consents, and disposition. Attending physicians, residents, and nurses completed a questionnaire before implementation of the worksheet and 3 times afterwards. Responses were scored on a 5-point scale (1 = understand nothing, 5 = completely understand). Continuous variables were analyzed by using a t test; categorical variables, by using a chi(2) test. RESULTS: Before the worksheet was implemented, scores for understanding goals were 3.9 for nurses and 4.6 for physicians. Scores increased to 4.8 for nurses (P = .001) and 4.9 for physicians (P = .03) 6 weeks later, an improvement that remained at 9 months. Both groups showed significant improvement in communication scores that lasted for 9 months. Most responders wanted to continue using the worksheet. During the study, the mean stay in the unit was 4.3 days, down from 6.4 days for the analogous 9-month period in the preceding year (P= .02). CONCLUSION: Nurses' and physicians' perceptions of their understanding of the goals of care and of communication between them were improved and stays in the unit were shortened when the worksheet was used.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of a standardized worksheet on physicians' and nurses' perceptions of their understanding of goals of care and on patients' length of stay in an intensive care unit. METHODS: A worksheet was completed daily during multidisciplinary rounds and was posted at each bedside in the medical intensive care unit at Beth Israel Medical Center in New York. Information recorded included tests or procedures, medications, sedation, analgesia, catheters, consultations, nutrition, mobilization, family discussions, consents, and disposition. Attending physicians, residents, and nurses completed a questionnaire before implementation of the worksheet and 3 times afterwards. Responses were scored on a 5-point scale (1 = understand nothing, 5 = completely understand). Continuous variables were analyzed by using a t test; categorical variables, by using a chi(2) test. RESULTS: Before the worksheet was implemented, scores for understanding goals were 3.9 for nurses and 4.6 for physicians. Scores increased to 4.8 for nurses (P = .001) and 4.9 for physicians (P = .03) 6 weeks later, an improvement that remained at 9 months. Both groups showed significant improvement in communication scores that lasted for 9 months. Most responders wanted to continue using the worksheet. During the study, the mean stay in the unit was 4.3 days, down from 6.4 days for the analogous 9-month period in the preceding year (P= .02). CONCLUSION: Nurses' and physicians' perceptions of their understanding of the goals of care and of communication between them were improved and stays in the unit were shortened when the worksheet was used.
Authors: Kevin J O'Leary; Diane B Wayne; Corinne Haviley; Maureen E Slade; Jungwha Lee; Mark V Williams Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sarah A Collins; Suzanne Bakken; David K Vawdrey; Enrico Coiera; Leanne M Currie Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2010-11-27 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Kyle J Rehder; Tammy L Uhl; Jon N Meliones; David A Turner; P Brian Smith; Kshitij P Mistry Journal: Pediatr Crit Care Med Date: 2012-01 Impact factor: 3.624
Authors: Hirotaka Kato; Jessica M Clouser; Preetham Talari; Nikita L Vundi; Akosua K Adu; Kishore Karri; Kathy B Isaacs; Mark V Williams; Romil Chadha; Jing Li Journal: Cureus Date: 2022-05-24
Authors: Kevin J O'Leary; Diane B Wayne; Matthew P Landler; Nita Kulkarni; Corinne Haviley; Katherine J Hahn; Jiyeon Jeon; Katherine M Englert; Mark V Williams Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2009-09-19 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Sarah Collins; Ann C Hurley; Frank Y Chang; Anisha R Illa; Angela Benoit; Sarah Laperle; Patricia C Dykes Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-09-30 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Stanislav Henkin; Tony Y Chon; Marie L Christopherson; Andrew J Halvorsen; Lindsey M Worden; John T Ratelle Journal: J Multidiscip Healthc Date: 2016-05-02