Literature DB >> 21112422

Communication partner training in aphasia: a systematic review.

Nina Simmons-Mackie1, Anastasia Raymer, Elizabeth Armstrong, Audrey Holland, Leora R Cherney.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the effects of communication partner training on persons with aphasia and their communication partners. Specifically the systematic review addressed 3 clinical questions regarding the impact of partner training on language, communication activity and participation, psychosocial adjustment, and quality of life for adults with aphasia and their communication partners. DATA SOURCES: Twenty-three terms were used to search 12 electronic databases (eg, PubMed, CINAHL, PsychINFO, PsychArticles, CSA Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index [Web of Science], SUMSearch, TRIP, EMBASE, REHABDATA, National Library for Health, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) and the journal "Aphasiology." References from all relevant articles were hand-searched. STUDY SELECTION: Two reviewers independently applied inclusion criteria to select potential relevant articles from the titles and abstracts of references retrieved by the literature search. The full text of the remaining articles was reviewed by a 5-member panel, resulting in a corpus of 31 studies that met the final inclusion criteria. DATA EXTRACTION: Two independent reviewers extracted the descriptive data related to the participants, the intervention, the outcome measures, and the results. DATA SYNTHESIS: The 5-member review team by consensus classified the studies using the American Academy of Neurology system for classification of evidence (2004).
CONCLUSIONS: Evidence shows that communication partner training is effective in improving communication activities and/or participation of the communication partner and is probably effective in improving communication activities and/or participation of persons with chronic aphasia when they are interacting with trained communication partners. There is insufficient evidence to make recommendations related to the impact of partner training on persons with acute aphasia or the impact of training on language impairment, psychosocial adjustment, or quality of life for either the person with aphasia or the communication partner.
Copyright © 2010 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21112422     DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.08.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  27 in total

1.  Thinking About Better Speech: Mental Practice for Stroke-Induced Motor Speech Impairments.

Authors:  Stephen J Page; Stacy Harnish
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 2.773

2.  Comparing the effects of clinician and caregiver-administered lexical retrieval training for progressive anomia.

Authors:  Stephanie M Grasso; Kaleigh M Shuster; Maya L Henry
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rehabil       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.868

3.  Automatic Assessment of Speech Impairment in Cantonese-speaking People with Aphasia.

Authors:  Ying Qin; Tan Lee; Anthony Pak Hin Kong
Journal:  IEEE J Sel Top Signal Process       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 6.856

4.  Achieving Participation-Focused Intervention Through Shared Decision Making: Proposal of an Age- and Disorder-Generic Framework.

Authors:  Carolyn Baylor; Meghan Darling-White
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-05-28       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  Barriers to and Facilitators of Access and Participation in Community-Based Exercise Programmes from the Perspective of Adults with Post-stroke Aphasia.

Authors:  Diane C Blonski; Megan Covert; Roxanne Gauthier; Alanna Monas; Danielle Murray; Kelly K O'Brien; Anita Debbie Mendelson; Maria Huijbregts
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 6.  What is Functional Communication? A Theoretical Framework for Real-World Communication Applied to Aphasia Rehabilitation.

Authors:  W J Doedens; L Meteyard
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  2022-01-25       Impact factor: 7.444

7.  Listener Perceptions of Simulated Fluent Speech in Nonfluent Aphasia Aphasiology.

Authors:  Tyson G Harmon; Adam Jacks; Katarina L Haley; Richard A Faldowski
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 2.773

Review 8.  Cognitive impact of lower-grade gliomas and strategies for rehabilitation.

Authors:  Christina Weyer-Jamora; Melissa S Brie; Tracy L Luks; Ellen M Smith; Steve E Braunstein; Javier E Villanueva-Meyer; Paige M Bracci; Susan Chang; Shawn L Hervey-Jumper; Jennie W Taylor
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2020-11-04

9.  Association Between Communicative Participation and Psychosocial Factors in Patients With Voice Disorders.

Authors:  Viann N Nguyen-Feng; Alexa Asplund; Patricia A Frazier; Stephanie Misono
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-12-23       Impact factor: 6.223

10.  Hospital staff, volunteers' and patients' perceptions of barriers and facilitators to communication following stroke in an acute and a rehabilitation private hospital ward: a qualitative description study.

Authors:  Sarah D'Souza; Erin Godecke; Natalie Ciccone; Deborah Hersh; Heidi Janssen; Elizabeth Armstrong
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.