Literature DB >> 33355630

Association Between Communicative Participation and Psychosocial Factors in Patients With Voice Disorders.

Viann N Nguyen-Feng1, Alexa Asplund1, Patricia A Frazier2, Stephanie Misono3.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Communicative participation can be conceptualized as taking part in life situations in which people are socially engaged. Communicative participation is an important aspect in the lives of patients with voice disorders, although it has not been formally assessed among a broad sample of patients with voice disorders. The associations between communicative participation and associated concepts (vocal impairment, psychosocial distress, and voice-specific perceived control) are unknown yet important for integrated treatment approaches.
OBJECTIVE: The primary objective was to examine the associations between communicative participation and vocal impairment, psychosocial distress, and voice-specific perceived control. The secondary objective was to examine whether perceived control moderates the association of distress with communicative participation and vocal impairment, the latter of which would replicate previous research. The hypotheses were that communicative participation would be associated with lower vocal impairment, lower distress, and higher perceived control and that higher perceived control would moderate the association between communicative participation and both vocal impairment and psychosocial distress. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study was conducted from June 2014 to May 2017 among a consecutive sample of adult patients with voice disorders at an academic voice clinic affiliated with the University of Minnesota. Of the 744 patients approached to participate in the survey study, 590 patients agreed. Data analysis was performed from January to June 2020. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Communicative participation (measured by the 10-item general short form of the Communicative Participation Item Bank), vocal impairment (measured by the 10-item version of the Voice Handicap Index), psychosocial distress (measured by the 18-item version of the Brief Symptom Inventory), and voice-specific perceived control (measured by the 8-item present control subscale of the Perceived Control Over Stressful Events Scale).
RESULTS: The sample comprised 590 patients (mean [SD] age, 51.9 [17.1] years; 390 women [66.1%]) with voice disorders. Communicative participation was associated with lower vocal impairment (r = -0.73; 95% CI, -0.77 to -0.69), lower overall psychosocial distress (r = -0.22; 95% CI, -0.30 to -0.14), and higher voice-specific perceived control (r = 0.30; 95% CI, 0.23-0.37). Moderation analyses indicated that communicative participation was negatively associated with distress at all levels of perceived control and, replicating previous findings, greater vocal impairment was associated with higher psychosocial distress only in patients with lower perceived control. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this study, communicative participation was associated with, but distinct from, vocal impairment and was also associated with psychosocial distress and voice-specific perceived control. The study's results suggest that communicative participation is an important addition to voice research and clinical care.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 33355630      PMCID: PMC7758827          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.4956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  41 in total

Review 1.  Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies.

Authors:  E L Idler; Y Benyamini
Journal:  J Health Soc Behav       Date:  1997-03

2.  Further development of the temporal model of control.

Authors:  Patricia Frazier; Samantha Anders; Sandra Shallcross; Nora Keenan; Sulani Perera; Kelli Howard; Samuel Hintz
Journal:  J Couns Psychol       Date:  2012-09-03

3.  Psychological distress in patients with benign voice disorders.

Authors:  Nora Siupsinskiene; Artūras Razbadauskas; Laimis Dubosas
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 0.849

4.  Psychosocial distress in patients presenting with voice concerns.

Authors:  Stephanie Misono; Carol B Peterson; Liza Meredith; Kathryn Banks; Dipankar Bandyopadhyay; Bevan Yueh; Patricia A Frazier
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 2.009

5.  Developing the communicative participation item bank: Rasch analysis results from a spasmodic dysphonia sample.

Authors:  Carolyn R Baylor; Kathryn M Yorkston; Tanya L Eadie; Robert M Miller; Dagmar Amtmann
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Development and validation of the voice handicap index-10.

Authors:  Clark A Rosen; Annie S Lee; Jamie Osborne; Thomas Zullo; Thomas Murry
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  Association of voice and mental health diagnoses with differences in voice-related care utilization.

Authors:  Victoria A Jordan; Scott Lunos; Gretchen Sieger; Keith J Horvath; Seth Cohen; Stephanie Misono
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Disease-specific self-efficacy in spasmodic dysphonia patients.

Authors:  Amanda Hu; Derek Isetti; Allen D Hillel; Patricia Waugh; Bryan Comstock; Tanya K Meyer
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-01-08       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Assessing Change Over Time in Voice Handicap and Voice-Related Perceived Control Using Ecological Momentary Assessment.

Authors:  Viann N Nguyen-Feng; Patricia A Frazier; Ali Stockness; Scott Lunos; Alexis N Hoedeman; Stephanie Misono
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2019-04-26       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Statistical notes for clinical researchers: assessing normal distribution (2) using skewness and kurtosis.

Authors:  Hae-Young Kim
Journal:  Restor Dent Endod       Date:  2013-02-26
View more
  1 in total

1.  Errors in Table 2 and Table 3.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 6.223

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.