Literature DB >> 26238406

Subliminal presentation of emotionally negative vs positive primes increases the perceived beauty of target stimuli.

Vanessa Era1,2, Matteo Candidi3,4, Salvatore Maria Aglioti5,6.   

Abstract

Emotions have a profound influence on aesthetic experiences. Studies using affective priming procedures demonstrate, for example, that inducing a conscious negative emotional state biases the perception of abstract stimuli towards the sublime (Eskine et al. Emotion 12:1071-1074, 2012. doi: 10.1037/a0027200). Moreover, subliminal happy facial expressions have a positive impact on the aesthetic evaluation of abstract art (Flexas et al. PLoS ONE 8:e80154, 2013). Little is known about how emotion influences aesthetic perception of non-abstract, representational stimuli, especially those that are particularly relevant for social behaviour, like human bodies. Here, we explore whether the subliminal presentation of emotionally charged visual primes modulates the explicit subjective aesthetic judgment of body images. Using a forward/backward masking procedure, we presented subliminally positive and negative, arousal-matched, emotional or neutral primes and measured their effect on the explicit evaluation of perceived beauty (high vs low) and emotion (positive vs negative) evoked by abstract and body images. We found that negative primes increased subjective aesthetic evaluations of target bodies or abstract images in comparison with positive primes. No influence of primes on the emotional dimension of the targets was found, thus ruling out an unspecific arousal effect and strengthening the link between emotional valence and aesthetic appreciation. More specifically, that subliminal negative primes increase beauty ratings compared to subliminal positive primes indicates a clear link between negative emotions and positive aesthetic evaluations and vice versa, suggesting a possible link between negative emotion and the experience of sublime in art. The study expands previous research by showing the effect of subliminal negative emotions on the subjective aesthetic evaluation not only of abstract but also of body images.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aesthetics; Affective misattribution; Body perception; Emotions

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26238406     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-015-4395-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  57 in total

1.  Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being.

Authors:  James J Gross; Oliver P John
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  2003-08

2.  Stirring images: fear, not happiness or arousal, makes art more sublime.

Authors:  Kendall J Eskine; Natalie A Kacinik; Jesse J Prinz
Journal:  Emotion       Date:  2012-02-06

3.  Motor facilitation during action observation: topographic mapping of the target muscle and influence of the onlooker's posture.

Authors:  Cosimo Urgesi; Matteo Candidi; Franco Fabbro; Michela Romani; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 4.  The body in the brain revisited.

Authors:  Giovanni Berlucchi; Salvatore M Aglioti
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Conscious and unconscious emotional learning in the human amygdala.

Authors:  J S Morris; A Ohman; R J Dolan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-06-04       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Virtual lesion of right posterior superior temporal sulcus modulates conscious visual perception of fearful expressions in faces and bodies.

Authors:  Matteo Candidi; Bernard M C Stienen; Salvatore M Aglioti; Beatrice de Gelder
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2015-02-07       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 7.  Neuroaesthetics.

Authors:  Anjan Chatterjee; Oshin Vartanian
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Towards a sensorimotor aesthetics of performing art.

Authors:  B Calvo-Merino; C Jola; D E Glaser; P Haggard
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2008-01-22

9.  Experiencing art: the influence of expertise and painting abstraction level.

Authors:  Elina Pihko; Anne Virtanen; Veli-Matti Saarinen; Sebastian Pannasch; Lotta Hirvenkari; Timo Tossavainen; Arto Haapala; Riitta Hari
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  When art moves the eyes: a behavioral and eye-tracking study.

Authors:  Davide Massaro; Federica Savazzi; Cinzia Di Dio; David Freedberg; Vittorio Gallese; Gabriella Gilli; Antonella Marchetti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Thermal facial reactivity patterns predict social categorization bias triggered by unconscious and conscious emotional stimuli.

Authors:  Giorgia Ponsi; Maria Serena Panasiti; Giulia Rizza; Salvatore Maria Aglioti
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Do we enjoy what we sense and perceive? A dissociation between aesthetic appreciation and basic perception of environmental objects or events.

Authors:  A K M Rezaul Karim; Michael J Proulx; Alexandra A de Sousa; Lora T Likova
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 3.526

3.  How the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex Controls Affective Processing in Absence of Visual Awareness - Insights From a Combined EEG-rTMS Study.

Authors:  Kati Keuper; Esslin L Terrighena; Chetwyn C H Chan; Markus Junghoefer; Tatia M C Lee
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  The neural mechanism of aesthetic judgments of dynamic landscapes: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Xueru Zhao; Junjing Wang; Jinhui Li; Guang Luo; Ting Li; Anjan Chatterjee; Wei Zhang; Xianyou He
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.