Literature DB >> 21110156

Age and body mass index: significant predictive factors for successful laparoscopic antireflux surgery.

Tomoyuki Irino1, Hiroya Takeuchi, Soji Ozawa, Yoshiro Saikawa, Takashi Oyama, Kunihiko Hiraiwa, Takahisa Yoshikawa, Masaki Kitajima, Yuko Kitagawa.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) is a feasible treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) patients, but it is unclear who will benefit from the surgery. This study investigated patients' GERDspecific quality of life (GsQOL) and analyzed the factors leading to the performance of successful LARS.
METHODS: Twenty-six (57.8%) of 45 consecutive patients who underwent LARS for GERD during the last decade were enrolled. All patients were evaluated by 24-h pH monitoring, esophageal manometry, esophagogastro-duodenoscopy and physical examinations. GsQOL was assessed by a visual analog scale, and the difference between the pre- and postoperative scores was defined as the visual analog scale improvement score (VASIS). The patients were classified into three groups based on the VASIS, and their clinical factors and surgical outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: The high VASIS group patients (>70 VASIS; Excellent group) patients were significantly younger and obese in comparison to low the VASIS group (<30 VASIS; Poor group) consisting of older nonobese patients (P < 0.05). A multiple regression analysis revealed that age <60 years and body mass index (BMI) >25 kg/m(2) were significant factors that affected postoperative GsQOL. No other clinical or surgical factors had any influence on the postoperative GsQOL.
CONCLUSION: These results suggest that age and BMI can be predictive factors for the performance of successful LARS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21110156     DOI: 10.1007/s00595-009-4200-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Today        ISSN: 0941-1291            Impact factor:   2.549


  24 in total

1.  A comparison of Likert and visual analogue scales for measuring change in function.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; M Townsend; L B Berman; J L Keller
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

2.  The symptom index: a clinically important parameter of ambulatory 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring.

Authors:  G J Wiener; J E Richter; J B Copper; W C Wu; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 10.864

3.  Obesity is an independent risk factor for GERD symptoms and erosive esophagitis.

Authors:  Hashem B El-Serag; David Y Graham; Jessie A Satia; Linda Rabeneck
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Antireflux surgery for non-erosive and erosive reflux disease in community practice.

Authors:  R Thibault; E Coron; V Sébille; S Sacher-Huvelin; S Bruley des Varannes; J Gournay; J P Galmiche
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 8.171

5.  Clinical symptoms in endoscopic reflux esophagitis: evaluation in 8031 adult subjects.

Authors:  Kazuyo Okamoto; Ryuichi Iwakiri; Mitsuru Mori; Megumi Hara; Kayoko Oda; Akiko Danjo; Akifumi Ootani; Hiroyuki Sakata; Kazuma Fujimoto
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Gastroesophageal pressure gradients in gastroesophageal reflux disease: relations with hiatal hernia, body mass index, and esophageal acid exposure.

Authors:  Durk R de Vries; Margot A van Herwaarden; André J P M Smout; Melvin Samsom
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Esophageal testing of patients with noncardiac chest pain or dysphagia. Results of three years' experience with 1161 patients.

Authors:  P O Katz; C B Dalton; J E Richter; W C Wu; D O Castell
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Failure of esophageal peristalsis in older patients: association with esophageal acid exposure.

Authors:  A Cristina Achem; Sami R Achem; Mark E Stark; Kenneth R DeVault
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 10.864

9.  Effects of age on the gastroesophageal junction, esophageal motility, and reflux disease.

Authors:  Jacqueline Lee; Angela Anggiansah; Roy Anggiansah; Alasdair Young; Terry Wong; Mark Fox
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2007-11-01       Impact factor: 11.382

10.  Comparison of generic (SF-36) vs. disease-specific (GERD-HRQL) quality-of-life scales for gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  V Velanovich
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1998 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.267

View more
  3 in total

1.  Laparoscopy-assisted proximal gastrectomy with sentinel node mapping for early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hiroya Takeuchi; Takashi Oyama; Satoshi Kamiya; Rieko Nakamura; Tsunehiro Takahashi; Norihito Wada; Yoshiro Saikawa; Yuko Kitagawa
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Safety and effectiveness of antireflux surgery in obese patients.

Authors:  A Tandon; R Rao; A Hotouras; Q M Nunes; M Hartley; R Gunasekera; N Howes
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Age-related outcomes in laparoscopic hiatal hernia repair: Is there a "too old" for antireflux surgery?

Authors:  Alex Addo; Zachary Sanford; Andrew Broda; H Reza Zahiri; Adrian Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.