BACKGROUND: Antireflux surgery has been mainly evaluated in tertiary referral centres. Data regarding post-operative outcome in non-erosive reflux disease are lacking. AIM: To assess long-term outcome after antireflux surgery performed in a community practice setting. METHODS: We selected consecutively 60 non-erosive reflux disease patients and 61 erosive oesophagitis patients with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. After surgery, each subject answered a validated disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire and another questionnaire focusing on symptoms, late morbidity and drug use. RESULTS: After a 43-month median follow-up, an excellent outcome was reported by less than two-thirds of patients. Quality of life scores were lower in the non-erosive reflux disease group, especially in female patients. Non-erosive reflux disease patients reported more daily symptoms and more reflux-related symptoms (P = 0.04). Proton-pump inhibitor use was higher in non-erosive reflux disease patients (P < 0.005). Multivariate analysis identified four independent predictive factors associated with better outcome, namely male gender, abnormal preoperative acid exposure, a long duration of symptoms and surgical expertise. CONCLUSIONS: In community practice, the results of antireflux surgery are inferior to those reported by tertiary centres. Outcome seems poorer in non-erosive reflux disease especially in female patients. Nearly one-third of the non-erosive reflux disease patients continue to take proton-pump inhibitors. These results highlight the need for careful selection of patients before antireflux surgery.
BACKGROUND: Antireflux surgery has been mainly evaluated in tertiary referral centres. Data regarding post-operative outcome in non-erosive reflux disease are lacking. AIM: To assess long-term outcome after antireflux surgery performed in a community practice setting. METHODS: We selected consecutively 60 non-erosive reflux diseasepatients and 61 erosive oesophagitispatients with symptomatic gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. After surgery, each subject answered a validated disease-specific health-related quality of life questionnaire and another questionnaire focusing on symptoms, late morbidity and drug use. RESULTS: After a 43-month median follow-up, an excellent outcome was reported by less than two-thirds of patients. Quality of life scores were lower in the non-erosive reflux disease group, especially in female patients. Non-erosive reflux diseasepatients reported more daily symptoms and more reflux-related symptoms (P = 0.04). Proton-pump inhibitor use was higher in non-erosive reflux diseasepatients (P < 0.005). Multivariate analysis identified four independent predictive factors associated with better outcome, namely male gender, abnormal preoperative acid exposure, a long duration of symptoms and surgical expertise. CONCLUSIONS: In community practice, the results of antireflux surgery are inferior to those reported by tertiary centres. Outcome seems poorer in non-erosive reflux disease especially in female patients. Nearly one-third of the non-erosive reflux diseasepatients continue to take proton-pump inhibitors. These results highlight the need for careful selection of patients before antireflux surgery.