Literature DB >> 21110144

Use of coronary physiology in the catheterization laboratory to guide treatment in patients with coronary artery disease.

Michael McDaniel1, Habib Samady.   

Abstract

OPINION STATEMENT: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is an invasive pressure-derived index of epicardial stenosis severity used in the catheterization laboratory to assess the hemodynamic significance of coronary lesions when non-invasive functional assessment has either not been performed or is inconclusive. The rationale for the use of FFR is that coronary angiography cannot accurately predict the hemodynamic significance of lesions with diameter stenosis <90% and that there is a large body of literature supporting the use of FFR for directing coronary revascularization. Specifically, in patients with stable angina and low-risk acute coronary syndromes, revascularization with either percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery should be deferred for epicardial coronary stenoses with an FFR > 0.80. Use of FFR to direct coronary revascularization should continue to increase as it has been demonstrated to improve outcomes and reduce cost.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 21110144     DOI: 10.1007/s11936-010-0102-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med        ISSN: 1092-8464


  30 in total

1.  Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study.

Authors:  Nico H J Pijls; William F Fearon; Pim A L Tonino; Uwe Siebert; Fumiaki Ikeno; Bernhard Bornschein; Marcel van't Veer; Volker Klauss; Ganesh Manoharan; Thomas Engstrøm; Keith G Oldroyd; Peter N Ver Lee; Philip A MacCarthy; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-05-28       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 2.  Prognostic value of gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Ami E Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  If you want to stent ... do intravascular ultrasound!

Authors:  John McB Hodgson
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 11.195

4.  Fractional flow reserve in patients with prior myocardial infarction.

Authors:  B De Bruyne; N H Pijls; J Bartunek; K Kulecki; J W Bech; H De Winter; P Van Crombrugge; G R Heyndrickx; W Wijns
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-07-10       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 5.  Physiological basis of clinically used coronary hemodynamic indices.

Authors:  Jos A E Spaan; Jan J Piek; Julien I E Hoffman; Maria Siebes
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-01-24       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Physiological evaluation of the provisional side-branch intervention strategy for bifurcation lesions using fractional flow reserve.

Authors:  Bon-Kwon Koo; Kyung-Woo Park; Hyun-Jae Kang; Young-Seok Cho; Woo-Young Chung; Tae-Jin Youn; In-Ho Chae; Dong-Ju Choi; Seung-Jae Tahk; Byung-Hee Oh; Young-Bae Park; Hyo-Soo Kim
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2008-02-28       Impact factor: 29.983

7.  Angiographic versus functional severity of coronary artery stenoses in the FAME study fractional flow reserve versus angiography in multivessel evaluation.

Authors:  Pim A L Tonino; William F Fearon; Bernard De Bruyne; Keith G Oldroyd; Massoud A Leesar; Peter N Ver Lee; Philip A Maccarthy; Marcel Van't Veer; Nico H J Pijls
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-22       Impact factor: 24.094

8.  Fractional flow reserve for the assessment of nonculprit coronary artery stenoses in patients with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Argyrios Ntalianis; Jan-Willem Sels; Giedrius Davidavicius; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Olivier Muller; Catalina Trana; Emanuele Barbato; Michalis Hamilos; Fabio Mangiacapra; Guy R Heyndrickx; William Wijns; Nico H J Pijls; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 11.195

9.  Rationale and design of the Fractional Flow Reserve versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation (FAME) study.

Authors:  William F Fearon; Pim A L Tonino; Bernard De Bruyne; Uwe Siebert; Nico H J Pijls
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 4.749

10.  Analysis of coronary angioplasty practice in the United States with an insurance-claims data base.

Authors:  E J Topol; S G Ellis; D M Cosgrove; E R Bates; D W Muller; N J Schork; M A Schork; F D Loop
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Intravascular imaging tools in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: comprehensive assessment of anatomy and physiology.

Authors:  Parham Eshtehardi; Jennifer Luke; Michael C McDaniel; Habib Samady
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Quantification of the Effect of Pressure Wire Drift on the Diagnostic Performance of Fractional Flow Reserve, Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio, and Whole-Cycle Pd/Pa.

Authors:  Christopher M Cook; Yousif Ahmad; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Sukhjinder Nijjer; Ricardo Petraco; Rasha Al-Lamee; Jamil Mayet; Darrel P Francis; Sayan Sen; Justin E Davies
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 6.546

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.