Literature DB >> 15333221

Laparoscopic retroperitoneal ureterolithotomy: initial experience and review of literature.

Yassine Nouira1, Yosri Kallel, Mohamed Y Binous, Hammadi Dahmoul, Ali Horchani.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the place of retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in the management of ureteral calculi through an initial experience and review of previously reported cases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy was attempted in six patients (five men and one woman) with an age of 31 to 56 years (mean 41.5 years) who had large and impacted stones in the upper ureter. The stone size ranged from 18 to 40 mm (mean 25.7 mm). The retroperitoneal route was used in all cases.
RESULTS: The stone was removed in all but one case. The operative time ranged from 120 to 180 minutes (mean 160 minutes). No intraoperative complications were encountered. Postoperative complications included prolonged urinary leak in one patient. On follow-up, all patients were stone free with decompression of the upper urinary tract.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy is safe and effective and should be performed each time a ureterolithotomy is indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15333221     DOI: 10.1089/end.2004.18.557

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  16 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic urinary stone surgery: an updated evidence-based review.

Authors:  Andreas Skolarikos; Athanasios G Papatsoris; Stefanos Albanis; Dean Assimos
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  2010-04-16

2.  Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: minimally invasive second line treatment.

Authors:  Costantino Leonardo; Giuseppe Simone; Papalia Rocco; Salvatore Guaglianone; Giovanni Di Pierro; Michele Gallucci
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Application of a temporary ureter clamp for retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy.

Authors:  Xingqiao Wen; Xiaojuan Li; Jie Situ; Youqiang Fang; Xiaodong Chen; Xingxing Ruan; Yu Wang; Xin Gao
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 4.  [Importance of open and laparoscopic stone surgery].

Authors:  M Hruza; C Türk; T Frede; J Rassweiler
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 5.  Stones in special situations.

Authors:  Mordechai Duvdevani; Stavros Sfoungaristos; Karim Bensalah; Benoit Peyronnet; Amy Krambeck; Sanjay Khadji; Ahmet Muslumanuglu; David Leavitt; Jude Divers; Zeph Okeke; Arthur Smith; Janelle Fox; Michael Ost; Andreas J Gross; Hassan Razvi
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy; which is better: Transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach?

Authors:  Mostafa Khalil; Rabea Omar; Shabieb Abdel-Baky; Ahmed Mohey; Ahmed Sebaey
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-12

7.  Should we place ureteral stents in retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy?: Consideration of surgical techniques and complications.

Authors:  Jae Hyung You; Young Gon Kim; Myung Ki Kim
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2014-08-08

8.  Comparative analysis of upper ureteral stones (> 15 mm) treated with retroperitoneoscopic ureterolithotomy and ureteroscopic pneumatic lithotripsy.

Authors:  YunYan Wang; JianQuan Hou; DuanGai Wen; Jun OuYang; JunSong Meng; HaiJun Zhuang
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-02-19       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site ureterolithotomy for large impacted ureteral stones: initial experiences.

Authors:  Tae Heon Kim; Byong Chang Jeong; Seong Il Seo; Seong Soo Jeon; Deok Hyun Han
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2010-06-21

10.  Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: a simple device to retrieve stones.

Authors:  D Basavaraj; Pankaj Dangle; Anthony J Browning; Chandra Shekhar Biyani
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2007 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.