Literature DB >> 10720847

Why is urological laparoscopy minimally invasive?

P Fornara1, C Doehn, M Seyfarth, D Jocham.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic procedures have been developed and established with the view that a similar operative effect can be achieved with less traumatization, especially as far as systemic stress response is concerned. We report a prospective, controlled, nonrandomized animal and patient study to determine the systemic response to laparoscopic and open surgical procedures.
METHODS: In the animal study, 26 female pigs underwent either a laparoscopic bilateral varix ligation followed by bilateral nephrectomy (group I), sole introduction of trocars (group II) or sole establishment of an open surgical approach (group III). In the patient study, 145 patients underwent various laparoscopic procedures (nephrectomy, renal cyst marsupialization, varix ligation), open surgical procedures (nephrectomy, inguinal orchiectomy) or extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL). The serum parameters interleukin (IL)-6, IL-10 and C-reactive protein (CRP) were measured before, during and after the operative procedure.
RESULTS: In animals and patients, laparoscopy resulted in significantly lower serum levels of CRP during and after the operative procedure. Animals in group I showed a 5-fold elevation, in group II a 3-fold elevation and in group III a 9-fold elevation of CRP. In patients, the increase of CRP was twice as high after open unilateral nephrectomy than after laparoscopic unilateral or bilateral nephrectomy. IL-6 showed less marked elevation during laparoscopy, ESWL and minor operative procedures like laparoscopic varix ligation or inguinal orchiectomy when compared to an open unilateral nephrectomy. The parameter IL-10 showed no significant differences among the patient groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The extent of the acute phase reaction to the operative trauma correlates much more convincingly to the approach than to the extent of the procedure. Only larger operations like nephrectomy trigger a systemic acute phase reaction, which can be limited by the laparoscopic access. For minor operative procedures like varix ligation or exploration of cryptorchidism, laparoscopy offers technical advantages rather than minimal invasiveness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10720847     DOI: 10.1159/000052351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  29 in total

1.  [Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. Results after 300 procedures].

Authors:  J-U Stolzenburg; M C Truss; R Rabenalt; M Do; H Pfeiffer; A Bekos; J Neuhaus; C G Stief; U Jonas; W Dorschner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  Pure single-port laparoscopic surgery or mix of techniques?

Authors:  Evangelos Liatsikos; Iason Kyriazis; Panagiotis Kallidonis; Minh Do; Anja Dietel; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Comparison of surgical stress response to laparoscopic and open radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Sheng-Zheng Wang; Yu Chen; Huan-Yi Lin; Ling-Wu Chen
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Laparoscopic ureterolithotomy: minimally invasive second line treatment.

Authors:  Costantino Leonardo; Giuseppe Simone; Papalia Rocco; Salvatore Guaglianone; Giovanni Di Pierro; Michele Gallucci
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-11-26       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  [Renal cell carcinoma].

Authors:  P Fornara; M R Hoda
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 6.  [Ten years of laparoscopic living kidney donation. From an extravagant to a routine procedure].

Authors:  M Giessing; T F Fuller; S Deger; J Roigas; M Tüllmann; L Liefeldt; K Budde; T Fischer; B Winkelmann; D Schnorr; S A Loening
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.639

7.  [Renal cell carcinoma].

Authors:  A Haferkamp; D Rohde; S C Müller; H Rübben; M Hohenfellner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  [The value of laparoscopic kidney surgery in urology].

Authors:  A Jurczok; A Hamza; A Nill; H-P Gerbershagen; P Fornara
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 9.  [Radical and partial nephrectomy for RCC: laparoscopy or open surgery].

Authors:  G Janetschek
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 0.639

10.  Laparoendoscopic single-site versus conventional laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for renal cell cancer in patients with increased comorbidities and previous abdominal surgery: preliminary results of a single-centre retrospective study.

Authors:  Christopher Springer; Antonino Inferrera; Felix Kawan; André Schumann; Paolo Fornara; Francesco Greco
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 4.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.