Literature DB >> 2110969

Weber and noise adaptation in the retina of the toad Bufo marinus.

K Donner1, D R Copenhagen, T Reuter.   

Abstract

Responses to flashes and steps of light were recorded intracellularly from rods and horizontal cells, and extracellularly from ganglion cells, in toad eyecups which were either dark adapted or exposed to various levels of background light. The average background intensities needed to depress the dark-adapted flash sensitivity by half in the three cell types, determined under identical conditions, were 0.9 Rh*s-1 (rods), 0.8 Rh*s-1 (horizontal cells), and 0.17 Rh*s-1 (ganglion cells), where Rh* denotes one isomerization per rod. Thus, there is a range (approximately 0.7 log units) of weak backgrounds where the sensitivity (response amplitude/Rh*) of rods is not significantly affected, but where that of ganglion cells (1/threshold) is substantially reduced, which implies that the gain of the transmission from rods to the ganglion cell output is decreased. In this range, the ganglion cell threshold rises approximately as the square root of background intensity (i.e. in proportion to the quantal noise from the background), while the maintained rate of discharge stays constant. The threshold response of the cell will then signal light deviations (from a mean level) of constant statistical significance. We propose that this type of ganglion cell desensitization under dim backgrounds is due to a post-receptoral gain control driven by quantal fluctuations, and term it noise adaptation in contrast to the Weber adaptation (desensitization proportional to the mean background intensity) of rods, horizontal cells, and ganglion cells at higher background intensities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2110969      PMCID: PMC2216330          DOI: 10.1085/jgp.95.4.733

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Physiol        ISSN: 0022-1295            Impact factor:   4.086


  42 in total

1.  Functional characteristics of lateral interactions between rods in the retina of the snapping turtle.

Authors:  D R Copenhagen; W G Owen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Threshold setting by the surround of cat retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  H B Barlow; W R Levick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-08       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Evidence for passive electrotonic interactions in red rods of toad retina.

Authors:  H F Leeper; R A Normann; D R Copenhagen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1978-09-21       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Control of retinal sensitivity. II. Lateral interactions at the outer plexi form layer.

Authors:  F S Werblin
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1974-01       Impact factor: 4.086

5.  Movement-sensitive neurones in the toad's retina.

Authors:  J P Ewert; F Hock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Scotopic and mesopic light adaptation in the cat's retina.

Authors:  B Sakmann; O D Creutzfeldt
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1969       Impact factor: 3.657

7.  Receptive fields of frog retinal ganglion cells: response formation and light-dark-adaptation.

Authors:  K Donner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Excitation and adaptation in the vertebrate rod photoreceptor.

Authors:  K O Donner; S Hemilä
Journal:  Med Biol       Date:  1978-04

9.  Longitudinal spread of adaptation in the rods of the frog's retina.

Authors:  S Hemilä; T Reuter
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Retinal mechanisms of visual adaptation in the skate.

Authors:  D G Green; J E Dowling; I M Siegel; H Ripps
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1975-04       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  17 in total

1.  Functional architecture of synapses in the inner retina: segregation of visual signals by stratification of bipolar cell axon terminals.

Authors:  S M Wu; F Gao; B R Maple
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-06-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Temporal contrast adaptation in salamander bipolar cells.

Authors:  F Rieke
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Light responses and light adaptation in rat retinal rods at different temperatures.

Authors:  S Nymark; H Heikkinen; C Haldin; K Donner; A Koskelainen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Membrane current noise in dark-adapted and light-adapted isolated retinal rods of the larval tiger salamander.

Authors:  G J Jones
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Rod Photoresponse Kinetics Limit Temporal Contrast Sensitivity in Mesopic Vision.

Authors:  Yumiko Umino; Ying Guo; Ching-Kang Chen; Rose Pasquale; Eduardo Solessio
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-08       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Visual performance of the toad (Bufo bufo) at low light levels: retinal ganglion cell responses and prey-catching accuracy.

Authors:  A C Aho; K Donner; S Helenius; L O Larsen; T Reuter
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  Coincidence detection of single-photon responses in the inner retina at the sensitivity limit of vision.

Authors:  Petri Ala-Laurila; Fred Rieke
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-11-06       Impact factor: 10.834

8.  Spatial contrast sensitivity of birds.

Authors:  Mimi M Ghim; William Hodos
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-01-11       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Regulation of intracellular pH in salamander retinal rods.

Authors:  J Saarikoski; E Ruusuvuori; A Koskelainen; K Donner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1997-01-01       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  An asymmetric outer retinal response to drifting sawtooth gratings.

Authors:  Nina Riddell; Laila Hugrass; Jude Jayasuriya; Sheila G Crewther; David P Crewther
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.