Literature DB >> 957261

Threshold setting by the surround of cat retinal ganglion cells.

H B Barlow, W R Levick.   

Abstract

1. The slope of curves relating the log increment threshold to log background luminance in cat retinal ganglion cells is affected by the area and duration of the test stimulus, as it is in human pyschophysical experiments. 2. Using large area, long duration stimuli the slopes average 0-82 and approach close to 1 (Weber's Law) in the steepest cases. Small stimuli gave an average of 0-53 for on-centre units using brief stimuli, and 0-56 for off-centre units, using long stimuli. Slopes under 0-5 (square root law) were not found over an extended range of luminances. 3. On individual units the slope was generally greater for larger and longer test stimulus, but no unit showed the full extent of change from slope of 0-5 to slope of 1. 4. The above differences hold for objective measures of quantum/spike ratio, as well as for thresholds either judged by ear or assessed by calculation. 5. The steeper slope of the curves for large area, long duration test stimuli compared with small, long duration stimuli, is associated with the increased effectiveness of antagonism from the surround at high backgrounds. This change may be less pronounced in off-centre units, one of which (probably transient Y-type) showed no difference of slope, and gave parallel area-threshold curves at widely separated background luminances, confirming the importance of differential surround effectiveness in changing the slope of the curves. 6. In on-centre units, the increased relative effectiveness of the surround is associated with the part of the raised background light that falls on the receptive field centre. 7. It is suggested that the variable surround functions as a zero-offset control that sets the threshold excitation required for generating impulses, and that this is separate from gain-setting adaptive mechanisms. This may be how ganglion cells maintain high incremental sensitivity in spite of a strong maintained excitatory drive that would otherwise cause compressive response non-linearities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 957261      PMCID: PMC1309061          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1976.sp011492

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  27 in total

1.  CHANGES IN TIME SCALE AND SENSITIVITY IN THE OMMATIDIA OF LIMULUS.

Authors:  M G FUORTES; A L HODGKIN
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1964-08       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  RETINAL GANGLION CELLS RESPONDING SELECTIVELY TO DIRECTION AND SPEED OF IMAGE MOTION IN THE RABBIT.

Authors:  H B BARLOW; R M HILL; W R LEVICK
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1964-10       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  A HIGH-INTENSITY FLASH-SOURCE.

Authors:  R GERBRANDS; J C STEVENS
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1964-12

4.  VISUAL ADAPTATION.

Authors:  W A RUSHTON
Journal:  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1965-03-16

5.  Receptive fields of ganglion cells in the cat's retina.

Authors:  T N WIESEL
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1960-10       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Change of organization in the receptive fields of the cat's retina during dark adaptation.

Authors:  H B BARLOW; R FITZHUGH; S W KUFFLER
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1957-08-06       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Dark adaptation, absolute threshold and Purkinje shift in single units of the cat's retina.

Authors:  H B BARLOW; R FITZHUGH; S W KUFFLER
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1957-08-06       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Temporal and spatial summation in human vision at different background intensities.

Authors:  H B BARLOW
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1958-04-30       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat.

Authors:  C Enroth-Cugell; J G Robson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Adaptation and dynamics of cat retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  C Enroth-Cugell; R M Shapley
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  19 in total

1.  Scotopic versus photopic pattern onset-offset electroretinograms.

Authors:  S Pallas; W Schmidt; E Dodt
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 2.  Lateral interactions in the outer retina.

Authors:  Wallace B Thoreson; Stuart C Mangel
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2012-05-03       Impact factor: 21.198

3.  Interneuron circuits tune inhibition in retinal bipolar cells.

Authors:  Erika D Eggers; Peter D Lukasiewicz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Correlation-based development of ocularly matched orientation and ocular dominance maps: determination of required input activities.

Authors:  E Erwin; K D Miller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Improvement in human vision under bright light: grain or gain?

Authors:  B Chen; D I MacLeod; A Stockman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Initial processing of visual information within the retina and the LGN.

Authors:  S Marcelja
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1979-05-02       Impact factor: 2.086

7.  Retinal receptive fields under different adaptation levels studied with pattern-evoked ERG.

Authors:  M Korth; S Ilschner; O Sembritzki
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 3.117

8.  Effects of dark adaptation on spatial and temporal properties of receptive fields in cat lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  E Kaplan; S Marcus; Y T So
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  After-effects of small adapting fields.

Authors:  M M Hayhoe
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Temporal and spatial summation in the human rod visual system.

Authors:  L T Sharpe; A Stockman; C C Fach; U Markstahler
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.