Literature DB >> 11521767

Is there a relationship between speech and nonspeech auditory processing in children with dyslexia?

S Rosen1, E Manganari.   

Abstract

A group of 8 young teenagers with dyslexia were compared to age-matched control participants on a number of speech and nonspeech auditory tasks. There were no differences between the control participants and the teenagers with dyslexia in forward and simultaneous masking, nor were there any differences in frequency selectivity as indexed by performance with a bandstop noise. Thresholds for backward masking in a broadband noise were elevated for the teenagers with dyslexia as a group. If this deficit in backward masking had an influence on speech perception, we might expect the perception of "ba" versus "da" to be affected, as the crucial second formant transition is followed by a vowel. On the other hand, as forward masking is not different in the two groups, we would expect the perception of "ab" versus "ad" to be unaffected, as the contrastive second formant transition is preceded by a vowel. Overall speech identification and discrimination performance for these two contrasts was superior for the control group but did not differ otherwise. Thus, the clear group deficit in backward masking in the group with dyslexia has no simple relationship to the perception of crucial acoustic features in speech. Furthermore, the deficit for nonspeech analogues of the speech contrasts (second formants in isolation) was much less marked than for the speech sounds, with 75% of the listeners with dyslexia performing equivalently to control listeners. The auditory deficit cannot therefore be simply characterized as a difficulty in processing rapid auditory information. Either there is a linguistic/phonological component to the speech perception deficit, or there is an important effect of acoustic complexity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11521767     DOI: 10.1044/1092-4388(2001/057)

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  26 in total

1.  Differential activation of the visual word form area during auditory phoneme perception in youth with dyslexia.

Authors:  Lisa L Conant; Einat Liebenthal; Anjali Desai; Mark S Seidenberg; Jeffrey R Binder
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2020-06-26       Impact factor: 3.139

2.  Investigating speech perception in children with dyslexia: is there evidence of a consistent deficit in individuals?

Authors:  Souhila Messaoud-Galusi; Valerie Hazan; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2011-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Learning problems, delayed development, and puberty.

Authors:  Beverly A Wright; Steven G Zecker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  [Auditory processing and perception disorders - a definition : Guidelines of the German Society of Phoniatrics and Pedaudiology].

Authors:  M Ptok; A am Zehnhoff-Dinnesen; A Nickisch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.284

5.  [The relationship between minimal pair reproduction and writing skills].

Authors:  M Ptok; R Meisen
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 6.  From temporal processing to developmental language disorders: mind the gap.

Authors:  Athanassios Protopapas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  [Guideline: Auditive Processing and Perception Disorders: Definition : Guideline of the German Society of Phoniatrics and Pediatric Audiology].

Authors:  M Ptok; C Kiese-Himmel; A Nickisch
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Psychophysical indices of perceptual functioning in dyslexia: A psychometric analysis.

Authors:  Steve M Heath; Dorothy V M Bishop; John H Hogben; Neil W Roach
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Amplitude envelope onsets and developmental dyslexia: A new hypothesis.

Authors:  Usha Goswami; Jennifer Thomson; Ulla Richardson; Rhona Stainthorp; Diana Hughes; Stuart Rosen; Sophie K Scott
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Auditory scene analysis in school-aged children with developmental language disorders.

Authors:  E Sussman; M Steinschneider; W Lee; K Lawson
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 2.997

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.