Literature DB >> 14662185

The auditory basis of language impairments: temporal processing versus processing efficiency hypotheses.

Douglas E H Hartley1, Penny R Hill, David R Moore.   

Abstract

Claims have been made that language-impaired children have deficits processing rapidly presented or brief sensory information. These claims, known as the 'temporal processing hypothesis', are supported by demonstrations that language-impaired children have excess backward masking (BM). One explanation for these results is that BM is developmentally delayed in these children. However, little was known about how BM normally develops. Recently, we assessed BM in normally developing 6- and 8-year-old children and adults. Results showed that BM thresholds continue to improve over a comparatively protracted period (>10 years old). We also analysed reported deficits in BM in language-impaired and younger children, in terms of a model of temporal resolution. This analysis suggests that poor processing efficiency, rather than deficits in temporal resolution, can account for these results. This 'processing efficiency hypothesis' was recently tested in our laboratory. This experiment measured BM as a function of delays between the tone and the noise in children and adults. Results supported the processing efficiency hypothesis, and suggested that reduced processing efficiency alone could account for differences between adults and children. These findings provide a new perspective on the mechanisms underlying communication disorders, and imply that remediation strategies should be directed towards improving processing efficiency, not temporal resolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14662185     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2003.08.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  3 in total

1.  What is the deficit in phonological processing deficits: auditory sensitivity, masking, or category formation?

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Samantha Shune; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2010-12-15

2.  Musical experience and the aging auditory system: implications for cognitive abilities and hearing speech in noise.

Authors:  Alexandra Parbery-Clark; Dana L Strait; Samira Anderson; Emily Hittner; Nina Kraus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Evaluating cortical responses to speech in children: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study.

Authors:  Rachael J Lawrence; Ian M Wiggins; Jessica C Hodgson; Douglas E H Hartley
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2020-12-15       Impact factor: 3.208

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.