Literature DB >> 21109216

Proteomics technologies for the global identification and quantification of proteins.

Ian A Brewis1, P Brennan.   

Abstract

This review provides an introduction for the nonspecialist to proteomics and in particular the major approaches available for global protein identification and quantification. Proteomics technologies offer considerable opportunities for improved biological understanding and biomarker discovery. The central platform for proteomics is tandem mass spectrometry (MS) but a number of other technologies, resources, and expertise are absolutely required to perform meaningful experiments. These include protein separation science (and protein biochemistry in general), genomics, and bioinformatics. There are a range of workflows available for protein (or peptide) separation prior to tandem MS and subsequent bioinformatics analysis to achieve protein identifications. The predominant approaches are 2D electrophoresis (2DE) and subsequent MS, liquid chromatography-MS (LC-MS), and GeLC-MS. Beyond protein identification, there are a number of well-established options available for protein quantification. Difference gel electrophoresis (DIGE) following 2DE is one option but MS-based methods (most commonly iTRAQ-Isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantification or SILAC-Stable Isotope Labeling by Amino Acids) are now the preferred options. Sample preparation is critical to performing good experiments and subcellular fractionation can additionally provide protein localization information compared with whole cell lysates. Differential detergent solubilization is another valid option. With biological fluids, it is possible to remove the most abundant proteins by immunodepletion. Sample enrichment is also used extensively in certain analyses and most commonly in phosphoproteomics with the initial purification of phosphopeptides. Proteomics produces considerable datasets and resources to facilitate the necessary extended analysis of this data are improving all the time. Beyond the opportunities afforded by proteomics there are definite challenges to achieving full proteomic coverage. Proteomes are highly complex and identifying and quantifying low abundance proteins is a significant issue. Additionally, the analysis of poorly soluble proteins, such as membrane proteins and multiprotein complexes, is difficult. However, it is without doubt that proteomics has already provided significant insights into biological function and this will continue as the technology continues to improve. We also anticipate that the promise of proteomics in terms of biomarker discovery will increasingly be realized.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21109216     DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-381264-3.00001-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Protein Chem Struct Biol        ISSN: 1876-1623            Impact factor:   3.507


  43 in total

Review 1.  Obesidomics: contribution of adipose tissue secretome analysis to obesity research.

Authors:  Maria Pardo; Arturo Roca-Rivada; Luisa Maria Seoane; Felipe F Casanueva
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Use of quantitative membrane proteomics identifies a novel role of mitochondria in healing injured muscles.

Authors:  Nimisha Sharma; Sushma Medikayala; Aurelia Defour; Sree Rayavarapu; Kristy J Brown; Yetrib Hathout; Jyoti K Jaiswal
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  Molecular and genetic analysis of the Drosophila model of fragile X syndrome.

Authors:  Charles R Tessier; Kendal Broadie
Journal:  Results Probl Cell Differ       Date:  2012

Review 4.  Receptor tyrosine kinase signaling: regulating neural crest development one phosphate at a time.

Authors:  Katherine A Fantauzzo; Philippe Soriano
Journal:  Curr Top Dev Biol       Date:  2015-01-20       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 5.  The use of biophysical proteomic techniques in advancing our understanding of diseases.

Authors:  Qian Xu; Ziyou Cui; Gayathi Venkatraman; Aldrin V Gomes
Journal:  Biophys Rev       Date:  2012-03-15

Review 6.  Discovery and validation of graft-versus-host disease biomarkers.

Authors:  Sophie Paczesny
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  Protein-protein interactions: switch from classical methods to proteomics and bioinformatics-based approaches.

Authors:  Armand G Ngounou Wetie; Izabela Sokolowska; Alisa G Woods; Urmi Roy; Katrin Deinhardt; Costel C Darie
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 9.261

8.  Quantification of Cell-Penetrating Peptide Associated with Polymeric Nanoparticles Using Isobaric-Tagging and MALDI-TOF MS/MS.

Authors:  Jasper Z S Chiu; Ian G Tucker; Arlene McDowell
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.109

9.  PAR-CLIP: A Method for Transcriptome-Wide Identification of RNA Binding Protein Interaction Sites.

Authors:  Charles Danan; Sudhir Manickavel; Markus Hafner
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2016

Review 10.  Translation regulation gets its 'omics' moment.

Authors:  Scott Kuersten; Agnes Radek; Christine Vogel; Luiz O F Penalva
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 9.957

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.