Literature DB >> 21107891

Comprehensive smoke alarm coverage in lower economic status homes: alarm presence, functionality, and placement.

Elanor A Sidman1, David C Grossman, Beth A Mueller.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study are to estimate smoke alarm coverage and adherence with national guidelines in low- to mid-value owner-occupied residences, and to identify resident demographic, behavioral, and building characteristics and other fire and burn safety practices associated with smoke alarm utilization. Baseline visits were conducted with 779 households in King County, Washington, for a randomized trial of smoke alarm functionality. Presence, functionality, features, and location of pre-existing smoke alarms were ascertained by staff observation and testing. Household and building descriptors were collected using questionnaires. Households were classified by presence of smoke alarms, functional alarms, and functional and properly mounted alarms placed in hallways and on each floor but not in recommended avoidance locations. Smoke alarms were present in 89%, and functional units in 78%, of households. Only 6-38% met all assessed functionality and placement recommendations. Homes frequently lacked alarms in any bedrooms or on each floor. Building age, but not renovation status, was associated with all dimensions of smoke alarm coverage; post-1980 constructions were 1.7 times more likely to comply with placement recommendations than were pre-1941 homes (95% CI: 1.1-2.6). Respondent education and race/ethnicity, children <5 years, residency duration, number of floors, wood stoves and fireplaces, number of smoke alarms, recency of smoke alarm testing, carbon monoxide monitors, and fire ladders displayed varying relationships with alarm presence, functionality, and placement. Strategies for maintaining smoke alarms in functional condition and improving compliance with placement recommendations are necessary to achieve universal coverage, and will benefit the majority of households.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21107891     DOI: 10.1007/s10900-010-9337-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  19 in total

1.  A modified poisson regression approach to prospective studies with binary data.

Authors:  Guangyong Zou
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Correlates of reported smoke detector usage in an inner-city population: participants in a smoke detector give-away program.

Authors:  K N Shaw; M C McCormick; S L Kustra; R M Ruddy; R D Casey
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Risk and protective factors for fires, burns, and carbon monoxide poisoning in U.S. households.

Authors:  Carol W Runyan; Renee M Johnson; Jingzhen Yang; Anna E Waller; David Perkis; Stephen W Marshall; Tamera Coyne-Beasley; Kara S McGee
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  When one is not enough: prevalence and characteristics of homes not adequately protected by smoke alarms.

Authors:  C Peek-Asa; V Allareddy; J Yang; C Taylor; J Lundell; C Zwerling
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.399

5.  Tracking 1990 objectives for injury prevention with 1985 NHIS findings.

Authors:  R E Hoffman
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1986 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Randomized controlled trial of ionization and photoelectric smoke alarm functionality.

Authors:  B A Mueller; E A Sidman; H Alter; R Perkins; D C Grossman
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.399

7.  Deaths and injuries from house fires.

Authors:  G R Istre; M A McCoy; L Osborn; J J Barnard; A Bolton
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-06-21       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Smoke detector legislation: its effect on owner-occupied homes.

Authors:  E McLoughlin; M Marchone; L Hanger; P S German; S P Baker
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Identifying homes with inadequate smoke detector protection from residential fires in Pennsylvania.

Authors:  S N Forjuoh; J H Coben; S R Dearwater; H B Weiss
Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil       Date:  1997 Jan-Feb

10.  Risk factors for fatal residential fires.

Authors:  C W Runyan; S I Bangdiwala; M A Linzer; J J Sacks; J Butts
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-09-17       Impact factor: 91.245

View more
  6 in total

1.  Pilot Study of a Novel Partnership for Installing Smoke Alarms.

Authors:  Elise C Omaki; Shannon Frattaroli; Wendy C Shields; Eileen M McDonald; Nicholas Rizzutti; Meri-K Appy; Denise Voiles; Shelly Jamison; Andrea C Gielen
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-07

2.  Smoke alarm giveaway and installation programs: an economic evaluation.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Karin A Mack; Shane T Diekman
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  It Is Not the Batteries! Smoke Alarm Presence and Functionality 5 to 7 Years Postinstallation of Sealed Lithium Battery Alarms.

Authors:  Wendy Shields; Elise Omaki; Joel Villalba; Andrea Gielen
Journal:  J Burn Care Res       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 1.819

4.  Smoke Alarms and Carbon Monoxide Alarms in Households With Children, Puerto Rico, 2010.

Authors:  Jessica Chen; Timothy Dignam; Fuyuen Yip; Brenda Rivera García; Curtis Blanton; Mary Jean Brown; Kanta Sircar
Journal:  J Prim Prev       Date:  2020-06

5.  Changes in smoke alarm coverage following two fire department home visiting programs: what predicts success?

Authors:  Andrea C Gielen; Elise C Perry; Wendy C Shields; Eileen McDonald; Shannon Frattaroli; Vanya Jones
Journal:  Inj Epidemiol       Date:  2014-11-24

6.  Using photographic interpretation to evaluate the safety of home environments.

Authors:  Carlee Lehna; Stephanie Twyman; John Myers
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2016-08-26
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.