Literature DB >> 1508246

Risk factors for fatal residential fires.

C W Runyan1, S I Bangdiwala, M A Linzer, J J Sacks, J Butts.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Residential fires are the most important cause of fire-related mortality in the United States. Previous research has concentrated on fatal fires in urban areas; considerably less is known about fatal fires in rural areas.
METHODS: We studied fatal and nonfatal residential fires in predominantly rural areas. Using a case-control design, we compared all 151 fatal fires (cases) in single-family dwellings in North Carolina during a 13-month period with a sample of nonfatal fires (controls). Case fires were identified through the medical-examiner system, and control fires that occurred within a few weeks of the case fires were chosen from the records of randomly selected fire departments statewide. For each fire, fire officials were interviewed about the dwelling, the fire, the people involved, and the fire-response system.
RESULTS: Although heating incidents were the leading cause of fires, fatal fires were more likely to have been caused by smoking (31 percent of fatal fires vs. 6 percent of nonfatal fires). Mobile homes posed a higher risk of death if a fire occurred (odds ratio, 1.7; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1 to 2.6), as did the absence of a smoke detector (odds ratio, 3.4; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.1 to 5.6). Smoke detectors were more protective against death in fires involving young children and when no one present was impaired by alcohol or drugs or had a physical or mental disability. The presence of an alcohol-impaired person was the strongest independent risk factor for death in the case of a fire (odds ratio, 7.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 4.4 to 12.7).
CONCLUSIONS: Residential fires are most likely to be caused by heating equipment or smoking materials. The risk of death is greatest in fires in mobile homes, in those involving alcohol-impaired persons, and in those in houses without smoke detectors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1508246     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199209173271207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  57 in total

Review 1.  House fire injury prevention update. Part I. A review of risk factors for fatal and non-fatal house fire injury.

Authors:  L Warda; M Tenenbein; M E Moffatt
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.399

2.  Estimating the proportion of homes with functioning smoke alarms: a comparison of telephone survey and household survey results.

Authors:  M R Douglas; S Mallonee; G R Istre
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Smoke alarm ownership and house fire death rates in children.

Authors:  C DiGuiseppi; I Roberts; L Li
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 4.  Adolescent injury prevention and clinicians: time for instant messaging. Physicians can help to reduce pointless and early deaths.

Authors:  D Grossman
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  2000-03

Review 5.  Systematic review of controlled trials of interventions to promote smoke alarms.

Authors:  C DiGuiseppi; J P Higgins
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.791

6.  International smoke detector legislation--ISCAIP Smoke Detector Legislation Collaborators.

Authors: 
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.399

7.  A preschool program for safety and injury prevention delivered by home visitors.

Authors:  B D Johnston; J Britt; L D'Ambrosio; B A Mueller; F P Rivara
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.399

8.  Smoke alarm ownership and installation: a comparison of a rural and a suburban community in Georgia.

Authors:  A R Jones; C J Thompson; M K Davis
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2001-10

9.  Prevalence of working smoke alarms in local authority inner city housing: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Diane Rowland; Carolyn DiGuiseppi; Ian Roberts; Katherine Curtis; Helen Roberts; Laura Ginnelly; Mark Sculpher; Angela Wade
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-11-02

10.  Effectiveness of the cigarette ignition propensity standard in preventing unintentional residential fires in Massachusetts.

Authors:  Hillel R Alpert; David C Christiani; E John Orav; Douglas W Dockery; Gregory N Connolly
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-02-13       Impact factor: 9.308

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.