Literature DB >> 21105881

The role of emotions in risk communication.

Xiao-Fei Xie1, Mei Wang, Ruo-Gu Zhang, Jie Li, Qing-Yuan Yu.   

Abstract

We present two experiments investigating the role of emotions concerning technological and natural hazards. In the first experiment, technological hazards aroused stronger emotions, and were considered to be riskier than natural hazards. No differences were found between the texts versus audio presentations. However, the presence of pictures aroused stronger emotions and increased the perceived risk. Emotions play a mediating role between hazard types and perceived risk, as well as between pictures and perceived risk. The second experiment adopted real-world materials from webpages and TV. Emotions again play a mediating role between pictorial information and risk perception. Moreover, specific emotions were found to be associated with different types of action tendencies. For example, loss-based emotions (e.g., fear, regret) tend to lead to prevention strategies, whereas ethical emotions (e.g., anger) lead to aggressive behavior. We also find that loss-based emotions in the technical hazard scenario trigger more coping strategies (from prevention to retaliation) than in the natural hazard scenario.
© 2010 Society for Risk Analysis.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21105881     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01530.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  11 in total

1.  The Differential Consequences of Fear, Anger, and Depression in Response to COVID-19 in South Korea.

Authors:  Jounghwa Choi; Kyung-Hee Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.614

2.  Use of Emotional Response Modeling to Develop More Effective Risk Communication for Limited Literacy Adults: Evaluation of a "Dirty Bomb" Decision Aid.

Authors:  Judith Greener; Sarah Bauerle Bass; Jon D Morris; Thomas F Gordon
Journal:  Int J Commun Health       Date:  2016

3.  Cognitive and psychological reactions of the general population three months after the 2011 Tohoku earthquake and tsunami.

Authors:  Yasushi Kyutoku; Ryoko Tada; Takahiko Umeyama; Kenji Harada; Senichiro Kikuchi; Eiju Watanabe; Angela Liegey-Dougall; Ippeita Dan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  How do People Judge Risk? Availability may Upstage Affect in the Construction of Risk Judgments.

Authors:  Emir Efendić
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 4.302

5.  Fear, Anger, and Risk Preference Reversals: An Experimental Study on a Chinese Sample.

Authors:  Shengxiang She; Iveta Eimontaite; Dangli Zhang; Yan Sun
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-08-21

6.  The more involved in lead-zinc mining risk the less frightened: A psychological typhoon eye perspective.

Authors:  Rui Zheng; Li-Lin Rao; Xiao-Lu Zheng; Chao Cai; Zi-Han Wei; Yan-Hua Xuan; Shu Li
Journal:  J Environ Psychol       Date:  2015-10-22

7.  Exploring How Media Influence Preventive Behavior and Excessive Preventive Intention during the COVID-19 Pandemic in China.

Authors:  Liqun Liu; Jingzhong Xie; Ke Li; Suhe Ji
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  The Evolving Field of Risk Communication.

Authors:  Dominic Balog-Way; Katherine McComas; John Besley
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 4.000

9.  Attention to News Media, Emotional Responses, and Policy Preferences about Public Health Crisis: The Case of Fine Dust Pollution in South Korea.

Authors:  Soohee Kim; Yong-Chan Kim
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  Environmental Penalties, Investor Attention and Stock Market Reaction: Moderating Roles of Air Pollution and Industry Saliency.

Authors:  Hua Wu; Taiwen Feng; Wenbo Jiang; Ting Kong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.