Literature DB >> 35475004

Use of Emotional Response Modeling to Develop More Effective Risk Communication for Limited Literacy Adults: Evaluation of a "Dirty Bomb" Decision Aid.

Judith Greener1, Sarah Bauerle Bass1, Jon D Morris2, Thomas F Gordon3.   

Abstract

Behavioral, attitudinal, and emotional reactions to terrorism can be minimized by communication that promotes successful response through preparedness. However, a challenge to adequate preparedness is the substantial proportion of adults with "below basic" or "basic" literacy skills and how this affects development of health messages. This research explored whether a non-verbal emotional measurement and modeling technique (AdSAM®) can be used with a limited literacy population to support the development of message strategies for disaster situations such as a "dirty bomb" terror event. Adults with limited literacy were randomly assigned to review either a standard CDC decision aid written at a 9th grade level (n=22) or an adapted aid written at a 6rd grade level (n=28). Using the AdSAM® emotional response instrument, participants answered questions regarding their feelings about a 'dirty bomb'. The group shown the adaptive aid had more positive emotional responses, including less arousal and greater empowerment. The AdSAM® approach can provide researchers with insights into the design of tailored messages for a limited literacy population in high risk, high-emotion situations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AdSAM; Emotional Response Modeling; Limited-literacy; Radiation Terror Event (RTE)

Year:  2016        PMID: 35475004      PMCID: PMC9036491     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Commun Health        ISSN: 2359-8220


  10 in total

Review 1.  Choice and the relative pleasure of consequences.

Authors:  B A Mellers
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Risk as feelings.

Authors:  G F Loewenstein; E U Weber; C K Hsee; N Welch
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 17.737

3.  The role of emotions in risk communication.

Authors:  Xiao-Fei Xie; Mei Wang; Ruo-Gu Zhang; Jie Li; Qing-Yuan Yu
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  The role of the affect and availability heuristics in risk communication.

Authors:  Carmen Keller; Michael Siegrist; Heinz Gutscher
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Preparing for an epidemic of limited health literacy: weathering the perfect storm.

Authors:  Ruth M Parker; Michael S Wolf; Irwin Kirsch
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-05-02       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Validation of a decisional conflict scale.

Authors:  A M O'Connor
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1995 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.583

7.  A shortened instrument for literacy screening.

Authors:  Pat F Bass; John F Wilson; Charles H Griffith
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Rapid estimate of adult literacy in medicine: a shortened screening instrument.

Authors:  T C Davis; S W Long; R H Jackson; E J Mayeaux; R B George; P W Murphy; M A Crouch
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 1.756

9.  Validation of screening questions for limited health literacy in a large VA outpatient population.

Authors:  Lisa D Chew; Joan M Griffin; Melissa R Partin; Siamak Noorbaloochi; Joseph P Grill; Annamay Snyder; Katharine A Bradley; Sean M Nugent; Alisha D Baines; Michelle Vanryn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Measures of emotion: A review.

Authors:  Iris B Mauss; Michael D Robinson
Journal:  Cogn Emot       Date:  2009-02-01
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.