Literature DB >> 21104100

Clinical performance of a nanofilled resin composite with and without an intermediary layer of flowable composite: a 2-year evaluation.

Sebastian Stefanski1, Jan W V van Dijken.   

Abstract

The objective of this prospective clinical follow-up was to evaluate the 2-year clinical performance of a nanofilled resin composite in class II restorations. The restorations were made with and without intermediary layer of a nanofilled flowable resin composite studied in an intraindividual comparison. Each participant received at least two, as similar as possible, class II restorations of the nanofilled resin composite. One restoration of each pair (54) was chosen at random to be restored with an intermediary layer with flowable nanofilled resin composite. The other was restored without. The restorations were evaluated with slightly modified US Public Health Services criteria at baseline, 1, and 2 years. Ninety-two restorations, 46 pairs, were evaluated at 2 years. A prediction of the caries risk showed that 22 of the evaluated 48 patients were considered as high-risk patients. Two failures were observed, one in each group, resulting in a 2.2% failure rate. No statistical difference was seen between the restorations restored with and without layer of flowable resin composite. The nanofilled resin composite showed very good surface characteristics and color match, which did not change significantly during the follow-up period. The nanofilled resin composite showed a good clinical performance with a 2.2% failure rate after 2 years. No differences were observed between the restorations with and without the nanofilled flowable resin intermediary layer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21104100     DOI: 10.1007/s00784-010-0485-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Oral Investig        ISSN: 1432-6981            Impact factor:   3.573


  43 in total

1.  Longevity of new hybrid restorative materials in class III cavities.

Authors:  J W van Dijken
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 2.612

2.  Marginal integrity of different resin-based composites for posterior teeth: an in vitro dye-penetration study on eight resin-composite and compomer-/adhesive combinations with a particular look at the additional use of flow-composites.

Authors:  Claus Peter Ernst; Gereon Cortain; Marcus Spohn; Gerd Rippin; Brita Willershausen
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.304

3.  Effect of low-viscosity resin-based composite on the microleakage of cervical restorations.

Authors:  Shishei Kubo; Hiroaki Yokota; Haruka Yokota; Yoshihiko Hayashi
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.522

4.  3-year evaluation of a new open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.

Authors:  Anders Lindberg; Jan W V van Dijken; Marianne Lindberg
Journal:  Am J Dent       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 1.522

5.  Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid posterior resin-based composites: results at 3.5 years.

Authors:  Eric C M Poon; Roger J Smales; Kevin H K Yip
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.634

6.  Effect of flowable composite lining on microleakage and internal voids in Class II composite restorations.

Authors:  Yonca Korkmaz; Emre Ozel; Nuray Attar
Journal:  J Adhes Dent       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Selection of dental materials and longevity of replaced restorations in Public Dental Health clinics in northern Sweden.

Authors:  Karin Sunnegårdh-Grönberg; Jan W V van Dijken; Ulrika Funegård; Anders Lindberg; Mats Nilsson
Journal:  J Dent       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Effect of the use of rubber dam versus cotton rolls on marginal adaptation of composite resin fillings to acid-etched enamel.

Authors:  J W van Dijken; P Hörstedt
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 2.331

9.  Marginal adaptation of composite resin restorations placed with or without intermediate low-viscous resin. An SEM investigation.

Authors:  J W van Dijken; P Hörstedt
Journal:  Acta Odontol Scand       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.331

10.  Past caries recordings made in Public Dental Clinics as predictors of caries prevalence in early adolescence.

Authors:  L Seppä; H Hausen; L Pöllänen; K Helasharju; S Kärkkäinen
Journal:  Community Dent Oral Epidemiol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 3.383

View more
  6 in total

1.  Eight-year randomized clinical evaluation of Class II nanohybrid resin composite restorations bonded with a one-step self-etch or a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive.

Authors:  Jan W V van Dijken; Ulla Pallesen
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Dental cavity liners for Class I and Class II resin-based composite restorations.

Authors:  Andrew B Schenkel; Analia Veitz-Keenan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-03-05

3.  A 4-year clinical evaluation of direct composite build-ups for space closure after orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Mustafa Demirci; Safa Tuncer; Evren Öztaş; Neslihan Tekçe; Ömer Uysal
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-03-24       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 4.  Use of flowable resin composite as an intermediate layer in class II restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Cleber Paradzinski Cavalheiro; Helena Scherer; José Carlos Pettorossi Imparato; Fabrício Mezzomo Collares; Tathiane Larissa Lenzi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 3.606

Review 5.  Compliance of randomized controlled trials in posterior restorations with the CONSORT statement: a systematic review of methodology.

Authors:  Márcia Rezende; Ana Cristina Rodrigues Martins; Jadson Araújo da Silva; Alessandra Reis; Juliana Larocca de Geus
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 3.606

6.  Effects of flowable liners on the shrinkage vectors of bulk-fill composites.

Authors:  Dalia Kaisarly; D Meierhofer; M El Gezawi; P Rösch; K H Kunzelmann
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.573

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.