BACKGROUND: Cofactors might affect the risk of the rare progression from infection with carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) to cervical premalignancy to invasive cancer. Some studies have observed that Chlamydia trachomatis infection is associated with increased risk for cervical cancer. In a large prospective cohort, we assessed the role of C trachomatis in cervical premalignancy and addressed confounding by HPV. METHODS: We identified 182 women with prevalent and 132 women with incident histological cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2), grade 3 (CIN3), or cervical cancer (CIN2+) in the Costa Rica HPV Natural History Study. Control subjects were 995 (approximately 10% of the 10 049) subjects who were randomly selected from the same study. Cervical HPV status at enrollment was determined by MY09/MY11 polymerase chain reaction amplification and dot-blot hybridization. The presence of C trachomatis DNA in cervical exfoliated cells at enrollment was determined by a novel serovar-specific polymerase chain reaction-based C trachomatis detection and genotyping assay. Plasma drawn at enrollment from each subject was used to determine C trachomatis immunoglobulin G (IgG) status. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between C trachomatis and CIN2+, taking into account possible confounding by HPV. RESULTS: C trachomatis positivity at enrollment was associated with CIN2+ and concurrent and subsequent carcinogenic HPV infection. To account for confounding by HPV status, we restricted the analysis to women positive for carcinogenic HPV DNA at enrollment and found no association between C trachomatis status (as assessed by DNA or IgG) at enrollment and combined prevalent and/or incident CIN2+ (for C trachomatis DNA positivity, odds ratio = 0.77, 95% confidence interval = 0.42 to 1.41; for C trachomatis seropositivity, odds ratio = 1.09, 95% confidence interval = 0.85 to 1.41). CONCLUSIONS: We found no association between C trachomatis status, as assessed by DNA or IgG, and risk of cervical premalignancy, after controlling for carcinogenic HPV-positive status. Previous positive associations between C trachomatis and cervical premalignancy could have been caused, in part, by an increased susceptibility to HPV infection.
BACKGROUND: Cofactors might affect the risk of the rare progression from infection with carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) to cervical premalignancy to invasive cancer. Some studies have observed that Chlamydia trachomatis infection is associated with increased risk for cervical cancer. In a large prospective cohort, we assessed the role of C trachomatis in cervical premalignancy and addressed confounding by HPV. METHODS: We identified 182 women with prevalent and 132 women with incident histological cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (CIN2), grade 3 (CIN3), or cervical cancer (CIN2+) in the Costa Rica HPV Natural History Study. Control subjects were 995 (approximately 10% of the 10 049) subjects who were randomly selected from the same study. Cervical HPV status at enrollment was determined by MY09/MY11 polymerase chain reaction amplification and dot-blot hybridization. The presence of C trachomatis DNA in cervical exfoliated cells at enrollment was determined by a novel serovar-specific polymerase chain reaction-based C trachomatis detection and genotyping assay. Plasma drawn at enrollment from each subject was used to determine C trachomatis immunoglobulin G (IgG) status. Logistic regression was used to examine the association between C trachomatis and CIN2+, taking into account possible confounding by HPV. RESULTS: C trachomatis positivity at enrollment was associated with CIN2+ and concurrent and subsequent carcinogenic HPV infection. To account for confounding by HPV status, we restricted the analysis to women positive for carcinogenic HPV DNA at enrollment and found no association between C trachomatis status (as assessed by DNA or IgG) at enrollment and combined prevalent and/or incident CIN2+ (for C trachomatis DNA positivity, odds ratio = 0.77, 95% confidence interval = 0.42 to 1.41; for C trachomatis seropositivity, odds ratio = 1.09, 95% confidence interval = 0.85 to 1.41). CONCLUSIONS: We found no association between C trachomatis status, as assessed by DNA or IgG, and risk of cervical premalignancy, after controlling for carcinogenic HPV-positive status. Previous positive associations between C trachomatis and cervical premalignancy could have been caused, in part, by an increased susceptibility to HPV infection.
Authors: J Dillner; M Lehtinen; T Björge; T Luostarinen; L Youngman; E Jellum; P Koskela; R E Gislefoss; G Hallmans; J Paavonen; M Sapp; J T Schiller; T Hakulinen; S Thoresen; M Hakama Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1997-09-03 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Philip E Castle; Mark Schiffman; Patti E Gravitt; Hortense Kendall; Stacy Fishman; Huali Dong; Allan Hildesheim; Rolando Herrero; M Concepcion Bratti; Mark E Sherman; Attila Lorincz; John E Schussler; Robert D Burk Journal: J Med Virol Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 2.327
Authors: A C Rodríguez; P E Castle; J S Smith; C Bratti; A Hildesheim; M Schiffman; R Viscidi; R D Burk; R L Ashley; X Castellsagué; R Herrero Journal: Sex Transm Infect Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 3.519
Authors: Raphael P Viscidi; Mark Schiffman; Allan Hildesheim; Rolando Herrero; Philip E Castle; Maria C Bratti; Ana Cecilia Rodriguez; Mark E Sherman; Sophia Wang; Barbara Clayman; Robert D Burk Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2004-02 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Jennifer S Smith; Cristina Bosetti; Nubia Muñoz; Rolando Herrero; F Xavier Bosch; José Eluf-Neto; Chris J L M Meijer; Adriaan J C Van Den Brule; Silvia Franceschi; Rosanna W Peeling Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2004-09-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: M Concepción Bratti; Ana C Rodríguez; Mark Schiffman; Allan Hildesheim; Jorge Morales; Mario Alfaro; Diego Guillén; Martha Hutchinson; Mark E Sherman; Claire Eklund; John Schussler; Julie Buckland; Lidia A Morera; Fernando Cárdenas; Manuel Barrantes; Elmer Pérez; Thomas J Cox; Robert D Burk; Rolando Herrero Journal: Rev Panam Salud Publica Date: 2004-02
Authors: H Yoshikawa; C Nagata; K Noda; S Nozawa; A Yajima; S Sekiya; H Sugimori; Y Hirai; K Kanazawa; M Sugase; H Shimizu; T Kawana Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: S S Wang; M Schiffman; T S Shields; R Herrero; A Hildesheim; M C Bratti; M E Sherman; A C Rodriguez; P E Castle; J Morales; M Alfaro; T Wright; S Chen; B Clayman; R D Burk; R P Viscidi Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2003-10-06 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Mark Schiffman; Nicolas Wentzensen; Sholom Wacholder; Walter Kinney; Julia C Gage; Philip E Castle Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2011-01-31 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Nadja Vielot; Michael G Hudgens; Nelly Mugo; Michael Chitwa; Joshua Kimani; Jennifer Smith Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2015-06 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Mayara Costa Mansur Tavares; Jamilly Lopes de Macêdo; Sérgio Ferreira de Lima Júnior; Sandra de Andrade Heráclio; Melânia Maria Ramos Amorim; Maria de Mascena Diniz Maia; Paulo Roberto Eleutério de Souza Journal: Mol Biol Rep Date: 2014-01-07 Impact factor: 2.316
Authors: Catharina Johanna Alberts; Maarten F Schim van der Loeff; Mary R Papenfuss; Roberto José Carvalho da Silva; Luisa Lina Villa; Eduardo Lazcano-Ponce; Alan G Nyitray; Anna R Giuliano Journal: Sex Transm Dis Date: 2013-06 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Marcia L Shew; Aaron C Ermel; Bree A Weaver; Yan Tong; Wanzhu Tu; Laura M Kester; Cheryl Denski; J D Fortenberry; Darron R Brown Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2013-08-02 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Lois J Conley; Timothy J Bush; Teresa M Darragh; Joel M Palefsky; Elizabeth R Unger; Pragna Patel; Martin Steinau; E Milu Kojic; Harold Martin; E Turner Overton; Susan Cu-Uvin; John Hammer; Keith Henry; Kathleen Wood; John T Brooks Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2015-08-12 Impact factor: 5.226