Literature DB >> 21095241

DNA damage phenotype and prostate cancer risk.

O Kosti1, L Goldman, D T Saha, R A Orden, A J Pollock, H L Madej, A W Hsing, L W Chu, J H Lynch, R Goldman.   

Abstract

The capacity of an individual to process DNA damage is considered a crucial factor in carcinogenesis. The comet assay is a phenotypic measure of the combined effects of sensitivity to a mutagen exposure and repair capacity. In this paper, we evaluate the association of the DNA repair kinetics, as measured by the comet assay, with prostate cancer risk. In a pilot study of 55 men with prostate cancer, 53 men without the disease, and 71 men free of cancer at biopsy, we investigated the association of DNA damage with prostate cancer risk at early (0-15 min) and later (15-45 min) stages following gamma-radiation exposure. Although residual damage within 45 min was the same for all groups (65% of DNA in comet tail disappeared), prostate cancer cases had a slower first phase (38% vs. 41%) and faster second phase (27% vs. 22%) of the repair response compared to controls. When subjects were categorized into quartiles, according to efficiency of repairing DNA damage, high repair-efficiency within the first 15 min after exposure was not associated with prostate cancer risk while higher at the 15-45 min period was associated with increased risk (OR for highest-to-lowest quartiles=3.24, 95% CI=0.98-10.66, p-trend=0.04). Despite limited sample size, our data suggest that DNA repair kinetics marginally differ between prostate cancer cases and controls. This small difference could be associated with differential responses to DNA damage among susceptible individuals.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21095241      PMCID: PMC3038618          DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2010.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mutat Res        ISSN: 0027-5107            Impact factor:   2.433


  41 in total

1.  DNA damage levels in prostate cancer cases and controls.

Authors:  Kristin L Lockett; M Craig Hall; Peter E Clark; Shu-Chun Chuang; Brittany Robinson; Hui-Yi Lin; L Joseph Su; Jennifer J Hu
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 4.944

2.  Reliable Comet assay measurements for detecting DNA damage induced by ionising radiation and chemicals.

Authors:  T S Kumaravel; Awadhesh N Jha
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 3.  Investigating oxidative DNA damage and its repair using the comet assay.

Authors:  Andrew R Collins
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-10-26       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 4.  Mutagen sensitivity: a genetic predisposition factor for cancer.

Authors:  Xifeng Wu; Jian Gu; Margaret R Spitz
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Single cell gel/comet assay: guidelines for in vitro and in vivo genetic toxicology testing.

Authors:  R R Tice; E Agurell; D Anderson; B Burlinson; A Hartmann; H Kobayashi; Y Miyamae; E Rojas; J C Ryu; Y F Sasaki
Journal:  Environ Mol Mutagen       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.216

6.  Oxidative damage, bleomycin, and gamma radiation induce different types of DNA strand breaks in normal lymphocytes and thymocytes. A comet assay study.

Authors:  L Benítez-Bribiesca; P Sánchez-Suárez
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 7.  Markers of DNA repair and susceptibility to cancer in humans: an epidemiologic review.

Authors:  M Berwick; P Vineis
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-06-07       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 8.  Oxidative stress in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Lakshmipathi Khandrika; Binod Kumar; Sweaty Koul; Paul Maroni; Hari K Koul
Journal:  Cancer Lett       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 8.679

9.  Quantification of DNA repair capacity in whole blood of patients with head and neck cancer and healthy donors by comet assay.

Authors:  Daniel T Saha; Bruce J Davidson; Antai Wang; Allison J Pollock; Roy A Orden; Radoslav Goldman
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-10-18       Impact factor: 2.433

Review 10.  Is there evidence of a relationship between benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer? Findings of a literature review.

Authors:  Antonio Alcaraz; Peter Hammerer; Andrea Tubaro; Fritz H Schröder; Ramiro Castro
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 20.096

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.