Soo-Eun Chang1, Michael Angstadt2, Ho Ming Chow2, Andrew C Etchell2, Emily O Garnett2, Ai Leen Choo3, Daniel Kessler2, Robert C Welsh4, Chandra Sripada2. 1. Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. Electronic address: sooeunc@med.umich.edu. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. 3. Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, California State University East Bay, Hayward, CA, United States. 4. Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States.
Abstract
PURPOSE: We combined a large longitudinal neuroimaging dataset that includes children who do and do not stutter and a whole-brain network analysis in order to examine the intra- and inter-network connectivity changes associated with stuttering. Additionally, we asked whether whole brain connectivity patterns observed at the initial year of scanning could predict persistent stuttering in later years. METHODS: A total of 224 high-quality resting state fMRI scans collected from 84 children (42 stuttering, 42 controls) were entered into an independent component analysis (ICA), yielding a number of distinct network connectivity maps ("components") as well as expression scores for each component that quantified the degree to which it is expressed for each child. These expression scores were compared between stuttering and control groups' first scans. In a second analysis, we examined whether the components that were most predictive of stuttering status also predicted persistence in stuttering. RESULTS: Stuttering status, as well as stuttering persistence, were associated with aberrant network connectivity involving the default mode network and its connectivity with attention, somatomotor, and frontoparietal networks. The results suggest developmental alterations in the balance of integration and segregation of large-scale neural networks that support proficient task performance including fluent speech motor control. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the view that stuttering is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder and provides comprehensive brain network maps that substantiate past theories emphasizing the importance of considering situational, emotional, attentional and linguistic factors in explaining the basis for stuttering onset, persistence, and recovery.
PURPOSE: We combined a large longitudinal neuroimaging dataset that includes children who do and do not stutter and a whole-brain network analysis in order to examine the intra- and inter-network connectivity changes associated with stuttering. Additionally, we asked whether whole brain connectivity patterns observed at the initial year of scanning could predict persistent stuttering in later years. METHODS: A total of 224 high-quality resting state fMRI scans collected from 84 children (42 stuttering, 42 controls) were entered into an independent component analysis (ICA), yielding a number of distinct network connectivity maps ("components") as well as expression scores for each component that quantified the degree to which it is expressed for each child. These expression scores were compared between stuttering and control groups' first scans. In a second analysis, we examined whether the components that were most predictive of stuttering status also predicted persistence in stuttering. RESULTS: Stuttering status, as well as stuttering persistence, were associated with aberrant network connectivity involving the default mode network and its connectivity with attention, somatomotor, and frontoparietal networks. The results suggest developmental alterations in the balance of integration and segregation of large-scale neural networks that support proficient task performance including fluent speech motor control. CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the view that stuttering is a complex neurodevelopmental disorder and provides comprehensive brain network maps that substantiate past theories emphasizing the importance of considering situational, emotional, attentional and linguistic factors in explaining the basis for stuttering onset, persistence, and recovery.
Authors: Soo-Eun Chang; Kirk I Erickson; Nicoline G Ambrose; Mark A Hasegawa-Johnson; Christy L Ludlow Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2007-10-13 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Vince D Calhoun; Tulay Adali; Kent A Kiehl; Robert Astur; James J Pekar; Godfrey D Pearlson Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Tae-Un Han; Jessica Root; Laura D Reyes; Elizabeth B Huchinson; Johann du Hoffmann; Wang-Sik Lee; Terra D Barnes; Dennis Drayna Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2019-08-12 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Nathaniel Boley; Sanath Patil; Emily O Garnett; Hua Li; Diane C Chugani; Soo-Eun Chang; Ho Ming Chow Journal: J Speech Lang Hear Res Date: 2021-03-09 Impact factor: 2.297