Literature DB >> 21094636

The effect of motor imagery on gain modulation of the spinal reflex.

T Aoyama1, F Kaneko.   

Abstract

Motor imagery is well known to have a facilitatory effect on the corticospinal tract, but conflicting opinions have arisen concerning its effect on spinal reflex excitability. The purpose of this study was to clarify the effects of motor imagery on gain modulation of the spinal reflex by focusing on the physiological differences between the H-reflex and the stretch reflex. In experiment 1, there were three conditions: rest, motor imagery of ankle dorsiflexion (MI-DF), and motor imagery of ankle plantarflexion (MI-PF). The subjects were instructed to imagine 100% maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MI-100) in each direction of movement. To examine the effects of the imagined effort level on spinal reflex excitability, the subjects also imagined 50% maximum voluntary contraction (MI-50) in experiment 2. The soleus H-reflex and the stretch reflex amplitude and background EMG (bEMG) activity were measured. There were no significant differences in bEMG activity between the H-reflex and stretch reflex measurements. In experiment 1, although the H-reflex amplitude did not change significantly among the three conditions, the stretch reflex amplitude increased significantly under the MI-DF and MI-PF conditions compared to the rest condition. In addition, the stretch reflex amplitude under the MI-100 condition was significantly larger than that under the MI-50 condition in experiment 2. These results indicate that motor imagery has a selective facilitatory effect on stretch reflex pathways. Furthermore, this excitability change may occur in untargeted antagonist muscles as well as targeted agonist muscles and may depend on the imagined effort level. Copyright Â
© 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21094636     DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.11.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res        ISSN: 0006-8993            Impact factor:   3.252


  18 in total

1.  New evidence of corticospinal network modulation induced by motor imagery.

Authors:  Sidney Grosprêtre; Florent Lebon; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Alain Martin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-12-30       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Spinal plasticity with motor imagery practice.

Authors:  Sidney Grosprêtre; Florent Lebon; Charalambos Papaxanthis; Alain Martin
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  The power of the mind: the cortex as a critical determinant of muscle strength/weakness.

Authors:  Brian C Clark; Niladri K Mahato; Masato Nakazawa; Timothy D Law; James S Thomas
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Muscular responses appear to be associated with existence of kinesthetic perception during combination of tendon co-vibration and motor imagery.

Authors:  Eriko Shibata; Fuminari Kaneko; Masaki Katayose
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Influence of kinesthetic motor imagery and effector specificity on the long-latency stretch response.

Authors:  Christopher J Forgaard; Ian M Franks; Dana Maslovat; Romeo Chua
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The changes in spinal reciprocal inhibition during motor imagery in lower extremity.

Authors:  Hideto Nakayama; Michiyuki Kawakami; Yoko Takahashi; Kunitsugu Kondo; Eiji Shimizu
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2021-01-19       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  Intersession reliability of thoracolumbar multisegmental motor responses.

Authors:  Selda Uzun; Fikriye Ovak Bittar; Mohamed A Sabbahi
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 1.985

8.  Motor imagery modulation of body sway is task-dependent and relies on imagery ability.

Authors:  Thiago Lemos; Nélio S Souza; Carlos H R Horsczaruk; Anaelli A Nogueira-Campos; Laura A S de Oliveira; Claudia D Vargas; Erika C Rodrigues
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Motor imagery and electrical stimulation reproduce corticospinal excitability at levels similar to voluntary muscle contraction.

Authors:  Fuminari Kaneko; Tatsuya Hayami; Toshiyuki Aoyama; Tomohiro Kizuka
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Influence of motor imagery of isometric opponens pollicis activity on the excitability of spinal motor neurons: a comparison using different muscle contraction strengths.

Authors:  Yoshibumi Bunno; Yuko Yurugi; Chieko Onigata; Toshiaki Suzuki; Hiroyasu Iwatsuki
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2014-07-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.