Literature DB >> 28823036

Muscular responses appear to be associated with existence of kinesthetic perception during combination of tendon co-vibration and motor imagery.

Eriko Shibata1,2, Fuminari Kaneko3,4, Masaki Katayose5.   

Abstract

The afferent inputs from peripheral sensory receptors and efferent signals from the central nervous system that underlie intentional movement can contribute to kinesthetic perception. Previous studies have revealed that tendon vibration to wrist muscles elicits an excitatory response-known as the antagonist vibratory response-in muscles antagonistic to the vibrated muscles. Therefore, the present study aimed to further investigate the effect of tendon vibration combined with motor imagery on kinesthetic perception and muscular activation. Two vibrators were applied to the tendons of the left flexor carpi radialis and extensor carpi radialis. When the vibration frequency was the same between flexors and extensors, no participant perceived movement and no muscle activity was induced. When participants imagined flexing their wrists during tendon vibration, the velocity of perceptual flexion movement increased. Furthermore, muscle activity of the flexor increased only during motor imagery. These results demonstrate that kinesthetic perception can be induced during the combination of motor imagery and co-vibration, even with no experience of kinesthetic perception from an afferent input with co-vibration at the same frequency. Although motor responses were observed during combined co-vibration and motor imagery, no such motor responses were recorded during either co-vibration alone or motor imagery alone, suggesting that muscular responses during the combined condition are associated with kinesthetic perception. Thus, the present findings indicate that kinesthetic perception is influenced by the interaction between afferent input from muscle spindles and the efferent signals that underlie intentional movement. We propose that the physiological behavior resulting from kinesthetic perception affects the process of modifying agonist muscle activity, which will be investigated in a future study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antagonist vibratory response; Kinesthetic perception; Motor imagery; Proprioceptive input; Tendon vibration

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28823036     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-5057-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  32 in total

1.  Kinesthetic illusion of wrist movement activates motor-related areas.

Authors:  E Naito; H H Ehrsson
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-12-04       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Perceptual changes in illusory wrist flexion angles resulting from motor imagery of the same wrist movements.

Authors:  R Kitada; E Naito; M Matsumura
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Responses of monkey precentral neurones to passive movements and phasic muscle stretch: relevance to man.

Authors:  J G Colebatch; R J Sayer; R Porter; O B White
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1990-02

4.  Proprio-tactile integration for kinesthetic perception: an fMRI study.

Authors:  A Kavounoudias; J P Roll; J L Anton; B Nazarian; M Roth; R Roll
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Kinesthetic illusory feeling induced by a finger movement movie effects on corticomotor excitability.

Authors:  F Kaneko; T Yasojima; T Kizuka
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  An increase in cortical excitability with no change in spinal excitability during motor imagery.

Authors:  S Yahagi; K Shimura; T Kasai
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1996-08

7.  Evidence for facilitation of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) induced by motor imagery.

Authors:  T Kasai; S Kawai; M Kawanishi; S Yahagi
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1997-01-02       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  Alteration of proprioceptive messages induced by tendon vibration in man: a microneurographic study.

Authors:  J P Roll; J P Vedel; E Ribot
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The contribution of muscle afferents to kinaesthesia shown by vibration induced illusions of movement and by the effects of paralysing joint afferents.

Authors:  G M Goodwin; D I McCloskey; P B Matthews
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1972       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Perceptual and motor effects of agonist-antagonist muscle vibration in man.

Authors:  J C Gilhodes; J P Roll; M F Tardy-Gervet
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.