Literature DB >> 21094478

Measuring the dynamic mechanical response of hydrated mouse bone by nanoindentation.

Siddhartha Pathak1, J Gregory Swadener, Surya R Kalidindi, Hayden-William Courtland, Karl J Jepsen, Haviva M Goldman.   

Abstract

This study demonstrates a novel approach to characterizing hydrated bone's viscoelastic behavior at lamellar length scales using dynamic indentation techniques. We studied the submicron-level viscoelastic response of bone tissue from two different inbred mouse strains, A/J and B6, with known differences in whole bone and tissue-level mechanical properties. Our results show that bone having a higher collagen content or a lower mineral-to-matrix ratio demonstrates a trend towards a larger viscoelastic response. When normalized for anatomical location relative to biological growth patterns in the antero-medial (AM) cortex, bone tissue from B6 femora, known to have a lower mineral-to-matrix ratio, is shown to exhibit a significantly higher viscoelastic response compared to A/J tissue. Newer bone regions with a higher collagen content (closer to the endosteal edge of the AM cortex) showed a trend towards a larger viscoelastic response. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of this technique for analyzing local composition-property relationships in bone. Further, this technique of viscoelastic nanoindentation mapping of the bone surface at these submicron length scales is shown to be highly advantageous in studying subsurface features, such as porosity, of wet hydrated biological specimens, which are difficult to identify using other methods.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21094478      PMCID: PMC3279917          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  35 in total

1.  Intrapopulation variability in mineralization density at the human femoral mid-shaft.

Authors:  H M Goldman; T G Bromage; A Boyde; C D L Thomas; J G Clement
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Effects of drying on the mechanical properties of bovine femur measured by nanoindentation.

Authors:  J Y Rho; G M Pharr
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Mechanical properties and the hierarchical structure of bone.

Authors:  J Y Rho; L Kuhn-Spearing; P Zioupos
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.242

4.  Mechanical and morphological variation of the human lumbar vertebral cortical and trabecular bone.

Authors:  M E Roy; J Y Rho; T Y Tsui; N D Evans; G M Pharr
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1999-02

5.  Fourier transform infrared imaging microspectroscopy and tissue-level mechanical testing reveal intraspecies variation in mouse bone mineral and matrix composition.

Authors:  Hayden-William Courtland; Philip Nasser; Andrew B Goldstone; Lyudmila Spevak; Adele L Boskey; Karl J Jepsen
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Effects of tissue preservation on murine bone mechanical properties.

Authors:  Ara Nazarian; Bryan J Hermannsson; John Muller; David Zurakowski; Brian D Snyder
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2008-12-09       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Elastic properties of human cortical and trabecular lamellar bone measured by nanoindentation.

Authors:  J Y Rho; T Y Tsui; G M Pharr
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 12.479

8.  Nanoindentation and storage of teeth.

Authors:  Stefan Habelitz; Grayson W Marshall; Mehdi Balooch; Sally J Marshall
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Mechanical properties of hyaline and repair cartilage studied by nanoindentation.

Authors:  O Franke; K Durst; V Maier; M Göken; T Birkholz; H Schneider; F Hennig; K Gelse
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 8.947

10.  Genetic variability in adult bone density among inbred strains of mice.

Authors:  W G Beamer; L R Donahue; C J Rosen; D J Baylink
Journal:  Bone       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  15 in total

1.  Mechanical Heterogeneity in the Bone Microenvironment as Characterized by Atomic Force Microscopy.

Authors:  Xinyue Chen; Russell Hughes; Nic Mullin; Rhoda J Hawkins; Ingunn Holen; Nicola J Brown; Jamie K Hobbs
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  The Role of Water Compartments in the Material Properties of Cortical Bone.

Authors:  Mathilde Granke; Mark D Does; Jeffry S Nyman
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Intrinsic material property differences in bone tissue from patients suffering low-trauma osteoporotic fractures, compared to matched non-fracturing women.

Authors:  S Vennin; A Desyatova; J A Turner; P A Watson; J M Lappe; R R Recker; M P Akhter
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 4.398

4.  Effect of estrogen deficiency on regional variation of a viscoelastic tissue property of bone.

Authors:  Do-Gyoon Kim; Sarandeep S Huja; Anand Navalgund; Andrew D'Atri; BoonChing Tee; Sarah Reeder; Hye Ri Lee
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-11-08       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Static and time-dependent mechanical response of organic matrix of bone.

Authors:  Karanvir Saini; Dennis Discher; Navin Kumar
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2018-12-24

Review 6.  The roles of cellular nanomechanics in cancer.

Authors:  Murali M Yallapu; Kalpana S Katti; Dinesh R Katti; Sanjay R Mishra; Sheema Khan; Meena Jaggi; Subhash C Chauhan
Journal:  Med Res Rev       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 12.944

7.  Regional variation of bone tissue properties at the human mandibular condyle.

Authors:  Do-Gyoon Kim; Yong-Hoon Jeong; Erin Kosel; Amanda M Agnew; David W McComb; Kyle Bodnyk; Richard T Hart; Min Kyung Kim; Sang Yeun Han; William M Johnston
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 4.398

8.  Assessment of lamellar level properties in mouse bone utilizing a novel spherical nanoindentation data analysis method.

Authors:  Siddhartha Pathak; Shraddha J Vachhani; Karl J Jepsen; Haviva M Goldman; Surya R Kalidindi
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2012-05-11

9.  Differences between buccal and lingual bone quality and quantity of peri-implant regions.

Authors:  Do-Gyoon Kim; Kathy L Elias; Yong-Hoon Jeong; Hyun-Jung Kwon; Matthew Clements; William A Brantley; Damian J Lee; Jung-Suk Han
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2016-01-02

10.  Spatial distribution and remodeling of elastic modulus of bone in micro-regime as prediction of early stage osteoporosis.

Authors:  Kartikey Grover; Liangjun Lin; Minyi Hu; Jesse Muir; Yi-Xian Qin
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 2.712

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.